II sent a msg to 'the moderator' stating that I had found the robot 'joke' to be offensively bigoted and racist.
I said I had thought it would have been pulled.
I was appalled that the calibre of this forum had been tainted and even more so to suppose that my msg was taken by wayne and his irreverent immaturity and lack of common decency prevailed.
He should be sacked poste haste from his role as moderator!
No doubt they are and I don’t see anyone questioning that. Nor do I see how their race has in impact on their ability to be any of those things. It really sounds like you may have witnessed or been told of some very unfortunate events that have negatively impacted your family and that is horrible, but to be honest these are your issues to work through. Censorship is not the answer here.One of my daughters married a Nigerian and my two grandchildren are thus half African. Their father has an MBA and a high status career. Their mother has a Masters in Accounting. They are wonderful, successful people.
How dare they be inadvertently stereotyped as lazy, welfare bludgers and criminals on this forum!
These children deserve to live in this country without cowardly crass comments deriding their ethnic heritage.
How dare you infringe upon common decency in a public arena!
Political correctness has had a recent thread of its own and many believe it’s gone too far.Political correctness demands people be judged for who they are and not be denigrated by pathetic ignorant stereotyping that is illegal in this country!
Can one actually be "sacked" from a volunteer role? I would have thought "let go" or "removed" would be the PC term
You'll note this refers to the medium of communication, not what it actually said - clearly all material that refers to a particular race isn't 'racial hatred'. You'll have to try again.What are some examples of ‘racial hatred’?
The prohibited behaviour can be using speech, images or writing in public — for example:
You'll note this refers to the medium of communication, not what it actually said - clearly all material that refers to a particular race isn't 'racial hatred'. You'll have to try again.
Also, how do you account for the prominence of race-based material in stand-up comic routines?
What are some examples of ‘racial hatred’?
The prohibited behaviour can be using speech, images or writing in public — for example:
writing racist graffiti in a public place — including school playgrounds or bus stop shelters
making racist speeches at a public rally or assemblies
placing racist posters or stickers in a public place
making a racially abusive comment, joke, song or gesture in a public place — including shops, workplaces, parks, public transport, and schools
offensive racist comments or drawings in a newspaper, leaflet, website or other publication..
You'll note this refers to the medium of communication, not what it actually said - clearly all material that refers to a particular race isn't 'racial hatred'. You'll have to try again.
Racial vilification is a compendious term which has been used to describe “all acts, conduct, behaviour or activity involving the defamation of individuals and groups on the ground of their colour, race or ethnic or national origins, as well as those which constitute the incitement or stirring up of hatred or other emotions of hostility and enmity against these individuals and groups” (Gibson 1990, p. 709).
A broad spectrum of behaviour is included within this definition ranging from so-called “ethnic jokes” and offensive words, to stereotyping, inflammatory media reporting, historical “revisionism” and racist hate propaganda disseminated by poster campaigns, pamphlets, graffiti and public broadcasts.
The introduction of anti-racial vilification legislation both in Australia and overseas has furthered the debate over two apparently conflicting rights, namely: the right of all citizens to freedom of expression... and the right of all citizens to live free from harassment and discrimination.
The recent work of critical race theorists, in particular, suggests that such behaviour is harmful not only to individual victims but also to the specific ethnic community targeted and thereby society as a whole. The cumulative harm of racial vilification serves to silence and subordinate minority ethnic groups, minimising their participation in society, affecting educational outcomes, career choices and life chances (Stefanou-Haag 1994). Not only does racial vilification of itself cause substantial pain but many argue that it also creates a climate in which more serious racist violence is likely to be carried out...
The harm which may be caused through racial vilification has, however, been clearly demonstrated throughout the world. The use of education, particularly targeted public education campaigns, civil and criminal remedies all have a role to play in combating such undesirable conduct, and although Australia has taken some steps toward regulating racial vilification in a constructive way, only further evaluative research will show whether or not the steps taken so far have been truly effective in changing attitudes and reducing racist behaviour in the community.
You're still missing the point.Doctorj... for your edification:
perhaps you could explain why it's incorrectI thought you were having delusions. You must be to skewer yourself with your own example. If you reread the thread, my issue was with your incorrect use of the symbol "^" and nothing whatever to do with my ability, or lack thereof, in calculation compound interest. It was never at issue.
Once again, hoist by your own petard.
Once again, unbelievable!!!!
...and absolutely irrelevant to the current topic.
OK, I getting confused!
What does "^" signify in these equations? It seems to metamorphose its function throughout this thread.
Doh!
Insinuating mathematical deficiency. However, my question in the thread, as per your example, was the about the function of the symbol "^" whose function differed according to the poster. A completely logical question in the circumstances.I do know that you're a bit shakey on simple compound interest calculations
[exasperated sigh]
H
Defeated on one point, only to bring up another point to be defeated on. OK let's boogie.
Here's an example: I wrote this in another forum some time ago.Just reading the recent posts on this thread I just can't believe how damn precious some of us have become.
It's actually law.Just reading the recent posts on this thread I just can't believe how damn precious some of us have become. For heaven's sake, just lighten up a bit.
Imo all this PC stuff ties in with the nanny state, all the endless rules, judgements and censorship. We are not free to say anything any more.
Full article - http://www.smh.com.au/news/national...formhtmlbpollba/2008/06/30/1214677946009.htmlEXTRAORDINARY new powers will allow police to arrest and fine people for "causing annoyance" to World Youth Day participants and permit partial strip searches at hundreds of Sydney sites, beginning today.
The laws, which operate until the end of July, have the potential to make a crime of wearing a T-shirt with a message on it, undertaking a Chaser-style stunt, handing out condoms at protests, riding a skateboard or even playing music, critics say.
So if it's OK to label whites with stereotypes, then it's Ok to label blacks with stereotypes according to your rules.Wayne if you want to defend racist jokes of ASF, then that’s your prerogative.
But equally, the majority of (serious) white collar crime is committed by whites – hence the reverse “joke” also applies.
(PS definition of white collar crime varies , and only 20% of complaints are even looked into btw)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?