Instead of going after the banks who called their own and dragged the libs kicking and screaming into itNo cover up.
Abbott attempted a stich up job on the unions and it fell flat.
Heydon was biased and the results speak for themselves.
Instead of going after the banks who called their own and dragged the libs kicking and screaming into itNo cover up.
Abbott attempted a stich up job on the unions and it fell flat.
Heydon was biased and the results speak for themselves.
Na they blow-out costs.Unions don't quote jobs
Yeah and it's not rainingYou guys allowed to play outside yet.
Hardly. It did not exonerate unions.No cover up.
Abbott attempted a stich up job on the unions and it fell flat.
Heydon was biased and the results speak for themselves.
Did you lay the newspaper on the front windscreen to check?Yeah and it's not raining
More delays more pays...Did you lay the newspaper on the front windscreen to check?
Might still get a "wet" day
Don't forget the "trainer" fees.More delays more pays...
It was Julia Gillard who originally wrote the act allowing the casual work force to happen and the unions signed off on itOh you mean the last decade of Liberal federal government and work choices lol
Why are they so scared of unions if they're useless or is it they outperformed the banks super funds
A classic example of the very thing the Libs accused the unions of...No cover up.
Abbott attempted a stich up job on the unions and it fell flat.
Heydon was biased and the results speak for themselves.
If it's "whataboutism", then all public service and those suckling from the teat seems to think taxpayers money is there to be wasted.A classic example of the very thing the Libs accused the unions of...
A taxpayer subsidised job for one of Abbotts' mates and a dirty womaniser to boot.
Of courseSetkaHeydon must be innocent 'til proven guilty which is fine for as long as the unions were similarly treated which they weren't
You cant be very old if you reckon casualising the workforce started with GillardIt was Julia Gillard who originally wrote the act allowing the casual work force to happen and the unions signed off on it
The latest edition of it yes th e NLP did up date it. Labor and unions signed off on it again
The NLP were never for the unions and alp apparently were the workers party and unions were to.
What makes the ALP worse than the NLP and that’s rather an achievement is that still pretend that they are for the worker. Labor are for migration and has far friendlier laws for the over seas worker. To believe the ALP and unions are still this is like being a grown person and believe in santa
How the Labor Party Sold Australia’s Public Assets for a Song
Many people think of privatization as a policy of conservative parties. In Australia, however, it was Paul Keating’s Labor that initiated a gigantic fire sale of public assets, setting in motion a process that made billions for private companies at the expense of everyone else.www.jacobinmag.com
Again you're from NSW....If it's "whataboutism", then all public service and those suckling from the teat seems to think taxpayers money is there to be wasted.
There's a longer list of grievances against politicians. The whole system is shoddy. Even the creation of some of these useless governing bodies.
At least unions have a core function that is vital. But denying they don't have a racket going on is blind. There's a bloody racket going on everywhere.
This from the Gina/bond state?Again you're from NSW....
You can’t have much of an idea about the whole topic if questioning that.You cant be very old if you reckon casualising the workforce started with Gillard
Before anyone jumps down my throat, I was a fully paid up member, my whole working life and did do shop stewards position.At least unions have a core function that is vital. But denying they don't have a racket going on is blind. There's a bloody racket going on everywhere.
No one's denying there's a racket - just putting it in context was well outside the motives of that royal commission.If it's "whataboutism", then all public service and those suckling from the teat seems to think taxpayers money is there to be wasted.
There's a longer list of grievances against politicians. The whole system is shoddy. Even the creation of some of these useless governing bodies.
At least unions have a core function that is vital. But denying they don't have a racket going on is blind. There's a bloody racket going on everywhere.
Well congratulations on being a genius!Before anyone jumps down my throat, I was a fully paid up member, my whole working life and did do shop stewards position.
What @moXJO said is the crux of the matter, the union used to be about workers and workers rights and conditions.
Now that has become secondary, the primary function now is to present an avenue for aspiring politicians to display their attributes, or for thugs to get into a racket IMO.
There are obviously still good people in the unions upper echelons, but those positions in the most have been hijacked by uni graduates, that could talk rings around them.
It was Julia Gillard who originally wrote the act allowing the casual work force to happen and the unions signed off on it
The latest edition of it yes th e NLP did up date it. Labor and unions signed off on it again
The NLP were never for the unions and alp apparently were the workers party and unions were to.
What makes the ALP worse than the NLP and that’s rather an achievement is that still pretend that they are for the worker. Labor are for migration and has far friendlier laws for the over seas worker. To believe the ALP and unions are still this is like being a grown person and believe in santa
How the Labor Party Sold Australia’s Public Assets for a Song
Many people think of privatization as a policy of conservative parties. In Australia, however, it was Paul Keating’s Labor that initiated a gigantic fire sale of public assets, setting in motion a process that made billions for private companies at the expense of everyone else.www.jacobinmag.com
You need to do some research because everything you've said there is arse about face.You can’t have much of an idea about the whole topic if questioning that.
There was laws that the casual had to get equal or more than the full timer and had to be made a permanent after x amount of time usually 6/12 months.
Gillard and the unions destroyed all that
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.