You've missed the point that you idiots think it's news is the problem
You've missed the point that you idiots think it's news is the problemObviously yes, if you didn't vote.
What surprised me more, was you posting up Murdoch news, it is written to a much higher level than you reading skill set. ?
The coloured pictures must have caught your attention.
People miss the point, because you don't explain your point.You've missed the point that you idiots think it's news is the problem
Here's some abc news thenObviously yes, if you didn't vote.
What surprised me more, was you posting up Murdoch news, it is written to a much higher level than you reading skill set. ?
The coloured pictures must have caught your attention.
NSW, hasn't it always had corruption issues, the ABC headline is typically misleading, TOP COP, really should have been former top cop it doesn't say that until you read the article. Pretty average reporting as usual IMO.Here's some abc news then
How top cop Mick Fuller's racehorse co-owner 'Chicken Dave' won a $3m contract with NSW Police
An ABC investigation reveals former NSW top cop Mick Fuller did not declare shares in racehorses with sporting identities and wealthy businessmen, raising concerns he breached anti-corruption rules.www.abc.net.au
Can't be to misleading if you figured it outNSW, hasn't it always had corruption issues, the ABC headline is typically misleading, TOP COP, really should have been former top cop it doesn't say that until you read the article. Pretty average reporting as usual IMO.
The current top cop is probably a bit pizzed understandably, if I was him, I would be asking for a formal apology.
Didn't some for political guy Obeid hit the news over there? but where there is money or power, there is corruption, it goes with the territory.
Then you usually find the fox in charge of the hen house gets corrupted eg former top cop.
It's not called deflecting, it's called highlighting, as I've already tried to explain to you in another thread, nothing is one dimensional.Can't be to misleading if you figured it out
nice try at deflecting
So we have the Premier,the deputy Premier and the top cop how many more angles do I need to look at?It's not called deflecting, it's called highlighting, as I've already tried to explain to you in another thread, nothing is one dimensional.
Look at issues from all angles and you find there are flaws in all systems especially proceedural issues, because corrupt people will always try to find ways to exploit their position.
The issue you have trouble with, is that you think corruption or bad behaviour is isolated to one side of politics, when in fact it isn't isolated at all wherever people with low moral standards get into a position of power they tend to abuse that power, be that the police force, political position or even in a football club.
And by the way, I'm obviously not the one who has trouble figuring things out, as is no doubt shown by our replies.
I've already told you, where ever there is a position of power or money, there will be someone of low moral standard trying to get the job to exploit it.So we have the Premier,the deputy Premier and the top cop how many more angles do I need to look at?
Probably the state that the top cop was from ffsI've already told you, where ever there is a position of power or money, there will be someone of low moral standard trying to get the job to exploit it.
It can't be simpler than that.
Which State are you talking about Victoria, NSW or Queensland, they all seem to be in the papers for some form of corruption or other.
As I've said previously, I judge on performance and projected outcomes, not on which party my father voted for.
Is that the person who is the top cop now, or are you talking about a person who used to be a top cop?Probably the state that the top cop was from ffs
Interesting article, stepping on very thin ice:
It’s time to return to Costello economics, whoever wins the federal election
Rising prices for fuel and groceries, rising mortgage interest rates ... voters are starting to realise a direct link between the huge hole in the federal budget and the holes in their pockets.www.smh.com.au
Being the treasurer of Australia isn’t easy. Voters only give you a pass mark if you succeed in two very different tasks at the same time. They expect you to prudently balance the federal budget, but they also want you to help balance their own household budget with tax cuts and generous family payments.
This is much easier said than done because balancing the federal budget means keeping revenue high and spending low, while supporting family budgets often requires the exact opposite: tax cuts and higher spending.
A little follow up.Why your vote is never splitting or wasted in our system. C'mon peeps, let's keep the bastards honest.
At least we can have multiple parties, unlike that bastion of goodness, the CCP.Just Nailed It.
China responds to claims of partisan meddling in Australia, saying it didn’t realise there was a difference between Labor and Liberal
View attachment 137761
The Chinese Government has sought to clear up a misunderstanding about its interference in the upcoming Australian election, saying it didn’t support Labor over the Coalition, having always assumed it was the same entity.
“We thought it was just a different word you used for the same thing,” a spokesperson for the Chinese Government said today. “Sometimes you call it Liberal, sometimes you call it Labor. It’s all just one and the same right?”
He said political parties were often referred to by two different names. “Like the Conservatives in Britain are sometimes called the ‘Tories’. The Republicans in America are called the ‘GOP’. One Nation in Australia are sometimes just referred to as ‘racists’. We thought it was something like that”.
He said analysts in China were surprised to learn they were different entities. “We’ve studied it a lot and, while the Liberal Party people seems a little bit crazier, when it came to policy we couldn’t find a discernible difference”.
China responds to claims of partisan meddling in Australia, saying it didn’t realise there was a difference between Labor and Liberal
“We thought it was just a different word you used for the same thing"www.theshovel.com.au
Is any comment necessary?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?