There was a woman on her back screaming obscenities only last year at the Mardi Gras.I think the observations by The Greens and Lydia Thorpe are astute. Imagine if it was a women MP who was drunk and on her back screaming obscenities into their phone ? Honestly the sky would truly fall in . The shame of it al. The degradation of public office ectera and so forth.
The reality is that almost everyone is aware that Parliament is a hard drinking, testosterone fuelled pit. Barnaby's drinking is no secret. There would be more than a few other MHR's who fall in the same category. The recognition of the boys club mentality of both Parliament and the community kicks in a bit with this incident. Yes its wrong. Must support them. Not a good look. Must do better. Normal platitudes.
But again. In no universe would such an approach be offered to a women MP.
Well, according to Expat Tax all the states have land tax on their books already.Trouble is if they did that, they'd likely try and replace it with something even worse, an annual tax on the land, rather than seeing the solution as being to thoroughly review every cent of government spending.
I say a land tax would be worse because it's basically a limitless pot of money with the way government thinks since they know people will do whatever they can to not lose their home. Put the tax up and they know it'll be paid no matter what. Versus stamp duty that has a natural limit in terms of real estate transactions.
Some might call it double dipping.All States have legislation similar to the Victorian Land Tax Act that make land tax a charge on land. Before a property can be transferred the purchaser will insist on a clear land tax certificate that is only available from the relevant revenue office.
There has been heaps of blue prints and never ending reports into how to broaden our tax system, all of them are collecting dust, mainly due to the fact all politicians appear to be only thinking about their immediate future not the Countries future as a whole.Well, according to Expat Tax all the states have land tax on their books already.
Some might call it double dipping.
Mick
They do but not for owner occupied residential.Well, according to Expat Tax all the states have land tax on their books already.
Mr sp hang on hasn't Airbus Elbow got the answers.There has been heaps of blue prints and never ending reports into how to broaden our tax system, all of them are collecting dust, mainly due to the fact all politicians appear to be only thinking about their immediate future not the Countries future as a whole.
Hopefully someone grows a pair and decides to take the risk, Hawke did it, so did Howard, whether we have anyone in the wings with the same single minded attitude, we will have to wait and see.
If not we will just grind our way into a third World economy, one welfare agenda at a time, until they are no longer affordable.
By dwelling in the past, the energy available to be deployed into the present is diminished.
To my mind, regardless of whichever political pony we hitch ourselves to, we should all make the sitting govt hungry for approval and give them curry when they take their eye off the ball.
We have current govt ministers deflecting responsibility and accountability on the previous govt of the Crown and the fanboys are all too happy about that, without realising it takes pressure off good governance.
We are supposed to be discerning and critical thinking grownups, with our own independent thoughts. Just sayin'
Then wouldn't your criticism be better spent directed at filling the vacuum of accountability for the sitting govt? You don't train your dog by beating on another.I think that asking serious questions about the integrity of the current Leader of the Opposition when he was the Minister for Home Affairs is absolutely about good governance. One of the best ways of putting pressure on incumbent Governments to do well is having an competent, conscientious opposition. You can't call the current Lib-National party that at the moment.
True, but the current leader of the Opposition could be PM one day, his character is relevant, as are all those in power or likely to be.Then wouldn't your criticism be better spent directed at filling the vacuum of accountability for the sitting govt? You don't train your dog by beating on another.
If Dutton becomes next PM, the current govt didn't perform to expectations and might well have benefitted from constructive criticism from its flock... criticism wasted on a two party neutered opposition whose job is to hold the govt to account, not the other way around?
From work or the grid ?So... how many of us good folk here are exercising our right to disconnect ?
I think it's a winner against the sinner...
Yeah, well, I may disagree vehemently on a couple of those points, but *strongly agree with your thought process.Indeed.
The current government could do better in a number of areas imo;
* they could have the guts to introduce a tax on resource exports instead of having people worry about the GST rising.
* they could abolish negative gearing and cgt discounts on all residential property purchases from now on, and limit existing deductions to one property per taxpayer and put the savings into social and affordable housing.
* they could invest more in renewable energy themselves like hydro and solar instead of expecting the private sector to do it and putting a barrel over governments (gold plated poles and wires).
* they could cut down on immigration until infrastructure can properly service the people already here.
* they could set up and fund schools concentrating on STEM subjects that State schools are now failing at in favour of "ethics" or LGBTI "awareness".
Lots of other stuff, but that's enough for now.
8. We did not see evidence of any ministerial involvement in the regional processing contract or procurement decisions, and the Secretary of Home Affairs said he never discussed such decisions with the Minister for Home Affairs. We did not come across any matter of deliberate wrong-doing or criminality.
12. In respect of the matters examined, coordination, communication and information flows within Home Affairs were inadequate, and communication from Home Affairs to AUSTRAC was inadequate. The responsibility for this rested with senior SES managers, and not with non-SES officers in the contract and procurement areas.
13. Proper due diligence was lacking when it came to contracts with relatively small companies with limited or no public profile, and where operations were to be in highrisk environments. In this context, over the years, Home Affairs (and therefore the Commonwealth) has had contractual relationships with:
a. a company whose owners were suspected, through the ownership of another company, of seeking to circumvent US sanctions against Iran, and with extensive suspicious money movements suggesting money laundering, bribery and other criminal activity;
b. companies under investigation by the AFP;
c. a company whose CEO was being investigated for possible drugs and arms smuggling into Australia, although, at the time it would have been unrealistic to have expected those responsible for contract and procurement to be aware of this; and
d. an enterprise suspected of corruption
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?