- Joined
- 23 October 2005
- Posts
- 859
- Reactions
- 0
Or both?
Perhaps higher expected relative inflationary pressures in the US adding to the case.....
Collective social moods sure set the trends, however these moods are sure altered by the fundamentals.
Like you say though, you can exploit the move through the charts, however, when is the trend prooven otherwise? This in itself can become extremelly vague. Sure, a wave breaking the rules or ("guidelines") or a pivot being penetrated can help, but in the end, it is a lot more random than most aknowledge.
No idea why people keep having stabs at F/A V T/A, both have their merits and if your making $$, you should not feel the need (not having a go at this thread, just a recurring arguement I have noticed throughout the forums lately).
Yes they can be altered by the fundementals, but sometimes not in a fundementally logical manner.
For example, the fundementals could be pointing to an expected market movement but the exact opposite happens. How do you explain these situations?
It is the PERCEPTION of the fundementals that is important not just the fundementals alone. Peoples perception is not all the same, in the same way peoples perception of charts are not the same. i.e subjective.
In so far as how one trades or exploits a trend, that is up to them to work out a methodology to do so. There are no guarantees in any trade , that is why it is important to employ what Douglas calls a "Probablistic Mindest"
You are right about the F/A and T/A debate. Both methods have merits and flaws, but generally one should use what works for them.
Yes it is a never ending debate I agree but it is also a healthy debate, and has been happening since the start of markets!!
All The Best
Wavepicker