- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,070
Like I said, there obviously is a protocol, why should you be able to circumvent that protocol because you have the money to pay a people smuggler.
I'll put it another way, you throw away all your identification and tell me which first World Countries will accept you?
Secondly If Australia takes your stance and says, just take anyone who arrives here, I would bet within two years you would be screaming to shut the border.
How the hell can we support a welfare state, when all and sundry can just arrive and take residence.
When do you stop it? and when you do have to stop it, because it is collapsing your economy. How do you tell the others that want to come in, that they aren't allowed, we can't cope?
It is much more sensible to regulate the intake to start with, the World is overpopulated, it is a global problem.
It does not break or circumvent any International protocol to seek refuge, by whatever mean. There is no such agreement about having to go to a recognised refugee camp, even if there's one.
And genuine refugees cannot just turn up to a UN office or an OZ embassy to file a claim. It just doesn't work that way. I mean, it's like telling a person who needs help to wait at some non-existence camp X, not knocking at your door for help because that would jump some queue.
As said before... no one is saying Australia should take all who turns up; nor should we be the only country to pay for the offshore gulag either. Make it a regional or an international issue... get others to chip in. Doing what we're doing doesn't help anyone, most important of us, not helping ourselves.
It's a myth that refugees flee, get settled and just stay on welfare.
They might claim welfare, work in some sweat shop or odd jobs for cash... So that's cheating... but they will soon learn the language, get a proper job [if anything it's how they can buy a house].
The world is not over populated. It's just that wealth are not spread more equitably. And we're all poorer for it.
Headline today showed that the top 5 richest men in the world own half of it.
How many can of Coke or house do you reckon Buffett would buy? How much intellectual vigour and hard labour do you think he could produce? Not half the world's combined.