This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

ASF spelling and grammar lessons

Hello Garpal,

Re "hypo", your explanation of this use might be correct, but I suspect a more likely derivation would be from the clinical term "hypomanic" where someone with e.g. bipolar disease would be having a wildly manic phase.
I don't know why the actual word "manic" is never used in such a setting, just "hypomania", suggesting a state somewhat below that of mania.
 
Here are a few mistakes which I see often in the press and on web sites:

  • The most annoying one, already noted above, is the addition of apostrophes in plurals. On trading websites you often see people writing "CFD's" when "CFDs" would be correct. Likewise, PCs, CDs, DVDs.
  • "Criteria" is plural, but many people use it when "criterion" is meant. You have one criterion, but two or more criteria.
  • Likewise, you have one phenomenon, but two or more phenomena.
  • Too many people write "to" when they mean "too", and vice versa.
  • "Should of" has just been noted by Julia, above.
  • The expression "one fell swoop" is often mistakenly written "one fowl swoop".
  • Traders often "pore over charts", but they rarely "pour over charts".
  • What is wrong with this quotation from today's Investor lift-out in The Age - "None of the CFD providers have been tested in a big market correction."? Answer: The word "none" is singular, so the sentence should read "None of the CFD providers has been tested in a big market correction." This is a very common mistake.
  • "One choice" - In the movie version of The Lord Of The Rings Gandalf says, after becoming trapped in the Mines of Moria, "We have but one choice". However, if only one course of action is available, then you actually have no choice.
I'm sure I have many more pet peeves lurking in the recesses of my brain, I'll add them as I think of them.

- Snaggle.
 


1. snaggle - thanks never realised that "pore" was wrong and i'm the richer for your having pointed it out.

maybe ...
" traders are often "poor over charts?" lol

2. not sure I agree - "We have but one choice" means to me (or could mean) "We have but one choice (that makes sense)".

I mean, consider the (legitimate IMO) sentence...
"we have no choice in the matter, the only thing that makes sense is to go forward".
and you would (presumably) have a problem that a choice suddenly emerged when there was "no choice WHATSOEVER (implied)".

surely this could mean "there are a number of choices, forward , backward, standing still, going sideways etc , .... BUT the only choice that makes sense is to go forward."

Sorry m8 - I'm just responding to the pedant vs pedant challenge lol.
 
Ah Snaggle, a fellow pedant/purist! If only your excellent examples would be taken to heart, even just on this forum.
 
Should of instead of should have - a pet peeve of mine too!

How about ATM machine and PIN number?
 
Hello garpal ,



Good day garpal.
 
"One choice" - In the movie version of The Lord Of The Rings Gandalf says, after becoming trapped in the Mines of Moria,

"We have but one choice".

However, if only one course of action is available, then you actually have no choice.
Snaggle I'm gonna challenge you on how you would have said that better.
although I suspect you're just making an interesting observation - and/ or just stirring the pot here

and obviously the "old world" language of Gandalf lends itself to Tolkien and/or middle English phraseology and stuff.

and surely you wouldn't want Tolkien to change one single word of the Hobbit for instance.. (c'mon - brilliant prose, surely, beautiful words )


personally I have no problem with that sentence (as per an earlier post back there - the adjoining post to yours I believe ..)
(** abutting, adjacent, approximal, bordering on, connecting, contiguous, impinging, interconnecting, juxtaposed, near, neighboring, next door, touching, verging etc)

I wonder how well it translates into Chinese for instance lol.

Try Gollum's typical phrases lol :-

"Thief! Thief, Baggins! We hates it, we hates it, we hates it forever!"
 

Attachments

  • gollum.jpg
    11.4 KB · Views: 162
Dear Wysiwg,

I take it that James Joyce, if he were alive, would be in strife.

Garpal

Garpal
I see James Joyce was born the year 1882 in Ireland and died the year 1941 in Switzerland.Wik. says he was considered one of the most influential writers of last century.Mainly writing fictional stories using the settings from his experiences,he created a series "The Dubliners".The final story in the series being "The Dead" which was made into a film.

So I suppose he was clever with word arrangement to enthrall (please greatly,hold spellbound lol) the many readers of which you are obviously one.I wonder how he would fare in present time with people having a very different state of mind?
 

Dear Wysiwg,

His last work was a great read, called Finnegan's Wake.

I'd suggest that if you want to get an idea of what I meant , only if you are inclined, you start your reading of Joyce with FW and work backwards to his earlier works.

Garpal
 
1. We will get rain soon. I know it will.
2. He turned his back on her.

3a. It sure is cold in here
3b. It surely is cold in here.

4a. In this class everyone performs at his or her fitness level
4b. In this class everyone performs at some fitness level

5a. Fred looks like he's happy
5b. Fred looks as if he's happy

6a. The man that accused my brother of murder is a doctor.
6b. The man who accused my brother of murder is a doctor.

difference between which and that
7a. He chose the kind of wine which suited him.
7b. He chose the kind of wine that suited him.

8a. He chose a wine, which he then drank at dinner
8b. He chose a wine, that he then drank at dinner

lol I'd have said "amongst" - ahh whatever

9a. If I was a millionaire, I'd buy a vineyard.
9b. If I were a millionaire, I'd buy a vineyard.
which is right and why ?
the book says its about " the mood of a verb "
 
1. snaggle - thanks never realised that "pore" was wrong and i'm the richer for your having pointed it out.

Sorry, 2020, I wasn't very clear. "Pore over charts" is correct. But most of the time posters seem to write "pour over charts", which is incorrect. That was my point.

Regards, Snaggle.
 
here's one I sure didnt know ( just found it in this book here)..
Compound Adjectives

10a. The heavy hearted young man turned away from his fiance and boarded the warship.
10b. The heavy-hearted young man turned away from his fiance and boarded the warship.

11a. The fat lazy dog jumped over the quick brown fox.
11b. The fat-lazy dog jumped over the quick-brown fox.

the reason 10b needs hyphenated "compound adjective" is that it needs both adjectives to make one idea, i.e. you cannot say - in this context - "the heavy young man" ; or the "hearted young man".
makes sense I guess.

(Same reasoning, 11a is right and 11b wrong)

Does it matter if you say "no-one" or "no one"? This book suggests not just be consistent in one document
likewise "alright" ands "all right"

PS Snaggle - yep - my dyslexia strikes again or just my pore english to blame - I meant, I never realised pore was RIGHT>
 
9a. If I was a millionaire, I'd buy a vineyard.
9b. If I were a millionaire, I'd buy a vineyard.
which is right and why ?
the book says its about " the mood of a verb "

I don't know about 'mood' but the 'were' is used when conveying a hypothetical situation, e.g. assuming you are not a millionaire, you are unlikely to be buying a vineyard.

e.g. further: someone who can't sing might say: " If I were a wonderful singer, then I could star in an opera".
 
Reading another thread, I've just been reminded of another mistake commonly seen on forums (fora?) such as this, namely, the incorrect use of "company's" (possessive) and "companies" (plural). For example, this is wrong:

It depends on the companies goals.

- Snaggle.
 
Reading another thread, I've just been reminded of another mistake commonly seen on forums (fora?) such as this, namely, the incorrect use of "company's" (possessive) and "companies" (plural). For example, this is wrong:



- Snaggle.

Where it could be ... depends on the company goals or depends on the goals of companies.
 
I would like to see more uniformity in English language.
By the way, French could do with some simplification too and German and many other languages.

All verbs to make past tense and past participle with –ed like put, puted
All plural nouns with –s or -es
All adjectives –er , -est, like happy, or happyer and happyest

Ridiculous proposal, but few changes were made in the past and new generations do not even blink learning current rules, except for general whinge, that things are bit tough.

Maybe it was important in the past, but lets look into future.
For modern Australian it is not as important how the word was created back in 10-th century in England.

Kids could also concentrate on more important issues.
 
yep
subjunctive mood apparently
as for other moods of verbs - (something I'd personally never heard of )... this website backs it up

apparently verbs come in several shapes and sizes and stuff:-

VOICE:-
active
passive voice

MOODS
Indicative,
Imperative, and
Subjunctive Mood

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_vmood.html
Verbs - Voice and Mood
Brought to you by the Purdue University Online Writing Lab.

Active and Passive voice:
Indicative, Imperative, and Subjunctive Mood:
 
"be that as it may" ("that be as it may" ; "that being as it may" etc)
is / are also subjunctive apparently...

and you wonder why people say that English difficult to learn

I wonder if Espiranza has an "optional subjunctive mood" for instance.

I guess it's if it is correct to say "be that as it may be"
and I wonder which is correct
"If you were I"
or
"If you were me" - ahh what the heck
(were it not for the fact that I have to do earn some crust, I'd search it out - it can stay a mystery for now).

"should I be found innocent..." subjunctive ? looks like it on first glance
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...