You mean 'tease'.
LMAO Gold
You mean 'tease'.
Thanks Judd!
Well I stand corrected. Just goes to show we can all improve our grammar and spelling irrespective of what we think we already know.
Well I disagree. I think Joe's original example was correct because 'people' is of itself a plural and therefore the apostrophe should come before the 's'.
The alternative would be to use the word 'persons' in which case the apostrophe would come after the 's' because the actual 's' makes the singular word 'person' plural. Heavens, this is very hard to dissect.
For a definitive ruling, contact Roly Sussex, Professor of Applied Language Studies: http://www.arts.uq.edu.au/slccs/index.html?page=18094&pid=.
He can answer any question about the English language.
Anyway, I fervently second Joe's plea for some attention to proof reading.
There are way too many misspellings and misuses of apostrophes.
Why is it that so many people are so enthusiastic about adding gratuitous apostrophes seemingly before final 's' in a word????
Example seen so often: "banana's for sale"!!
When you take my name and make it possessive it turns from Dennis to Dennis'
For example:
Dennis' bum looks cute in that new suit!
Apparently you can also add another s if you wanted; Dennis's. But in my opinion it looks weird.
You are, of course, quite right with your example. That has no connection, though, with what I was pointing out above.
And, sadly, none of us are in the happy position of being able to comment on whether or not your bum does in fact look cute in that new suit!
You were lucky. I was taught spelling by a sadistic teacher who would go around the class asking students to spell a word. If you got it wrong you got the cane. Spelling was not my best subject
So it's not surprising things get confusing.The apostrophe is used in English in two ways: (a) To indicate the dropping out of some letter(s), as in can't' (b) To flag a possessive form, as in the dog's dinner. We will see, however, that (b) originated as a version of (a).
There are four usages of the apostrophe:
(1) those which are logical and 'correct';
(2) those which are illogical but 'correct';
(3) exceptions to (2);
(4) those which are logical but 'incorrect' (of which, as we will see, a small subset may be right after all).
pedant, purist Both of these words mean a person who comments on linguistic niceties which others find boring. The difference is that you are a pedant, whereas I am a purist. This is because my standards arise from my direct understanding of the eternal truths, whereas yours stem from memory of some fusty old schoolmarm who taught you parsing.
Me too. It used to drive me nuts, but then I started to realise that they're both exceptional spellings.Lose and loose is THE word I see spelt D) wrong in forums most.
Me too. It used to drive me nuts, but then I started to realise that they're both exceptional spellings.
If you don't happen to know, why wouldn't you pronounce loose[/] the same way you pronounce choose and lose to rhyme with hose? Or, for that matter, with a soft 's' at the end like dose (unless you're Scottish and pronounce dose like
doze)?
I still notice them, especially the use of loose for [lose, but I don't get so annoyed because I can see how people might derive the wrong spelling.
Ghoti
Hobson's Choice is somewhat different from a Catch-22 situation, ....
and it's no different with all the other things that I used to fail English for at school
you and that bludy idiot - what's his name ? savant? or something ? https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=190250&highlight=savant#post190250similar to?
different from?
Oh , and what is pi to 23000 decimal places again????
ok - parse / correct / whatever this one - hypothetical - there are three toilets on board - the one used by the men on board, the one used by the ladies on board, and the one used by the animals. And a storm washes one overboard . Noah's wife is trying to tell Noah she saw what happened :-
E. Either the womens or the animals was washed overboard.
F. Either the womens or the animals were washed overboard.
G. Either the women's or the animals' was washed overboard.
maybe :-
H. Either the wom'en's' or the animal's" were washed overboard. ?
T. sorry both the missus and I am compulsively thinking like a square.Suppose there are four toilets on board :-
ok - parse / correct / whatever this one - hypothetical - there are FOUR toilets on board - the one used by the men on board, the one used by the ladies on board, and the ones used by the animals. And a storm washes an unknown number overboard . Noah's wife is trying to tell Noah she saw what happened :-
P. Either the womens or the animals was washed overboard.
Q. Either the womens or the animals were washed overboard.
R. Either the women's or the animals' was washed overboard.
maybe :-
S. Either the wom'en's' or the animal's" were washed overboard. ?
why didn't they make it easyhow do you say the following for instance....
the women's toilet
or
the animals' toilet
animal's toilet
animals' toilets
etc
The fat cat sat on the mat
And that was that fot that fat cat
as it ate so much shat(****)
All it could do was sat(sit) on the mat
Carry on
"I saw the sheep's splash after falling overboard"..... , and you have to understand this is hypothetical so there MIGHT be just one sheep for example:-
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.