My answer is ‘NO’
I’ve just been reading a few comments about what people think about the pay package of the Macquarie Ceo Allan Moss's $33.5 million dollar pay package.
And I continually read comment after comment of 'Greed' this and 'Greed' that. One thing i have realised when I started out investing, "Correct me if im wrong", is that a massive percentage of most public companies ceo's salary’s is from stock options and share grants.
Ive seen this written a few times, such as were the Yahoo executives in the state's decided to take a $1.00 salary, for better share option and stock bonuses, Bill Gates is the richiest man inn the world but only get's $970,000 (US) a year as a cash salary, but looking at this a seriously doubt he needs, the best thing about the link below is that 95% of that money is going to carity, "good on him".
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=MSFT
And on top of that, Australia companies paid nearly $70 Billion aussie dollars in tax last year, (Personal tax i think was around $120 billion.) and that's just the companies, not small businesses where the tax goes to personal income not company tax, and on top of that the fringe benefit's taxes which was probably close to another $5 billion.
I personally just don't see why big company executives, don’t deserve there massive pay packages, after the taxes, they and the companies they are in charge of put so much into the economy, which I think makes a big difference to the tax cuts we get all the time.
I just wanted to see what you guy's and girl's thought about this issue.
SPARTN
:viking:
Why is it greed?
Extraordinary results justify, indeed demand, extraordinary rewards. How wonderful it would be if every CEO of the companies that I am invested in turned in similar results and received similar rewards!
I only hope that they pay fully their tax obligations.
anon
Give the spare dollars to the people on the floor.
Before any of you jump on the band wagon... have you guys worked on the "floor" I think u will find any mac employee, regardless of their position will be handsomely rewarded come bonus time, it will obviously vary with responsibility. But I can almost bet my winky that mac office girls wont be running to other jobs anytime soon, I'm sure they are well looked after ($$$)
Secondly, what people do not realize is that these ceo's are taking on an enormous amount of responsibility, they control you, the shareholders $$$. this alone deserves a premium above anybody else in the company. If they F&*k up, it is their reputation, not the CFO's or other senior execs that suffer. If they ruin a co, I seriously doubt job offers will be flying at them.
Remember these guys are not you run of the mill commerce grads. They put their whole name behind the credibility of the company.
Anon,
the maximum super base above which an employer is not required to contribute the minimum 9% is 140,960 in 2006/07. note that they may choose to pay the employee more if they want and pay it on salary above that amount.
Adam
Hi Julia,Moss's annual income does seem enormous, but as I understand it, it's made up of a basic salary plus bonuses, and this arrangement applies to most of MBL's staff. i.e. they don't get the big bucks if they don't turn in the results.
And Macquarie does turn in the results.
I have a problem with executive staff being paid megabucks when they don't achieve results, i.e. Coles, or various other CEO's who have failed, then left with huge payouts, but for Allan Moss as an example, I am - as a shareholder- entirely happy for him to earn what he does, as long as he generates the sort of results which brings the benefits to shareholders.
How about considering the alternative in the case of MBL. Say you offer a bloke like Moss an "average" salary. Do you think he's going to stick around and say, oh well, all right then, I will still put in the effort to achieve the results? I doubt it. He'd be off overseas to where he can get what someone else will quickly be prepared to pay him.
Hi Julia,
Yes, exectives should be well rewarded, no arguments there. But Macquarie Bank's executive salaries are way over the top. Even Mr Howard reckons, as a private citizen, that its a huge amount. Its very hypocritical for the same executives to be call for wage restraint, yet increasing their own wages by ridiculous amounts. IMO its all about balance.
Hi Greggy,
I absolutely understand how you feel. However, the reality is if we want a company to be as successful as MBL, then we have to pay the going rate for that level of management.
The share price for MBL in the last five years has gone from about $26 - $97.
The share price for SUN in the last five years has gone from about $12 - $21.
The share price for WES in the last five years has gone from about $28 - $38.
The old cliche: you get what you pay for.
Cheers
Julia
you get what you pay for.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?