- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,070
I find the ethical argument strange.
Users avoid the credit card traps and payday loans companies. No one should be buying the banks as their behavior in respect to credit cards (ignoring all the other things) has been very poor e.g. 24% interest rates.
It amuses me they are sponsoring groups to attack Afterpay and directly requesting the Morrison Government to destroy the Afterpay model.
I first got involved when my nieces started using it. They don't have credit cards as they don't want debt traps.
Afterpay is a credit card disruptor.
AfterPay actually charges 25% on their targeted members. Plus that average of 4% on retailers.
That's pretty damn outrageous.
I know they say it's $68 or 25%, whichever is less... But that's per item right? Each item they could theoretically go up to where it's around 25% penalty.
Credit cards give you 55 days no interest right? AfterPay give its members 2 weeks instalment... so that's 56 days in total but with the fortnightly repayment, they require payback earlier than the traditional credit providers.
So if members all pay ontime, APT won't make money. They'd be lucky to break even. So their model relies on members forgetting or not having cash on time to repay.
For investors, that's the good news.
The bad news is that once members can't pay on time; won't be able to pay the late fees either. APT can't charge compounding interests and will have to chase up the debt. That costs money but for not much further benefit beside those additional fees the debt collector charges.