- Joined
- 24 December 2008
- Posts
- 130
- Reactions
- 0
Guys !
What's happening?
Shell owns 30% of of Arrow, Arrow owns 30% of PES, but BG wants to buy PES ?
What is BG trying to do?
I didn't quite understand.
Bg also says they owns 10% of PES! And they won't sell it to Arrow, as they down't want to own Arrow shares.
Do they want to own whole Arrow shares or what?
I am confused !
Any ideas!
I think cash + AOE shares is the more attractive option whatever the price of AOE is at the time the offer is taken up. I say that from the point of view of one who would hold onto AOE with the expectation of it going a lot higher in the long term. Obviously those who would immediately sell the AOE shares would have a different opinion.
I've held AOE since 2004 when they were 40 cents so I'm laughing anyway
It is conceivable that Shell could get more heavily involved. Pure’s acreage is appealing to Arrow and Shell because it would beef up their reserves base in the event that Shell decides to proceed with the building of an export LNG plant fed by coal-seam gas at Gladstone. Last year Shell paid $776 million to acquire a 30 per cent interest in Arrow’s coal seam gas acreage.
Shell hasn’t been as aggressive in acquiring a Queensland coal-seam gas exposure as BG, Petronas and ConocoPhillips but it wouldn’t want to be boxed into a position as a minor player either.
Pure is, however, probably worth more to BG than to Arrow or Shell. Around about the time Arrow unveiled its bid for Pure, BG was wrapping up its $5 billion acquisition of Queensland Gas (QGC). Pure’s best acreage is adjacent to QGC’s, so a successful bid for Pure would provide significant development and production synergies.
For BG, there would also be some option value in a Pure acquisition. QGC probably has the reserves to support a two-train LNG plant at Gladstone but adding acreage and reserves would give BG both security and the option of expanding the plant in future. All the prospective Queensland LNG rivals are focused on the longterm security of their resource bases.
AOE had to raise their offer if they were serious (as BG well knows). It's a good signal for the long term intentions of AOE and Shell.Quoting Basilio over on the PES thread last night:
Game on. Arrow has upped the offer to $3.00 plus 1.57 AOE shares for each PES shares. Value is stated as $7.16.
More significantly they have abandoned the 90% minimum (wonder why ) and want to roll this up very quickly. They want to start taking shares from tomorrow (Feb 12th)
Thought it was a bit fascinating how they claimed PES offered excellent proven resources and potentially a ton more on the rest of the tenement. So why the scungy initial offer?
Any thoughts on how high this could go? And do shareholders who don't sell early obtain the final price?
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Shells-last-chance-$pd20090209-P48KQ?OpenDocument&src=sph This seems odd, why would Shell spend millions buying into a deal with Arrow, only to sell it's PES holding to a rival bidder in BG? Doesn't seem likely, and anyway the new AOE bid for PES is now the superior one.From the link under: BG has left its run late. Arrow unveiled its cash and scrip bid for Pure in late December and dispatched its bidder’s statement last week. It has claimed the support of a fraction under 50 per cent of Pure’s register, including a 19.9 per cent shareholding of its own, a 14.9 per cent stake held by Shell and 11 per cent by Pure’s directors.
I guess adjust means to adjust. With that news brought out by Bg why would AOE fall in sp? What would become of Arrow if they aren't successful in their bid?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?