Directors and mgt own a large chunk of this stock...they will be guarding their wealth very closely...interests are aligned with ours.
Is it true what I am reading, the management and directors are at fault for the grief that the shareholders are suffering. Guarding their wealth a bit too closely.
Shock and horror!
Directors and mgt own a large chunk of this stock...they will be guarding their wealth very closely...interests are aligned with ours.
http://business.smh.com.au/dont-jud...r--it-cant-be-all-that-bad/20080124-1nz0.html
a good article to balance out the bollocking it was receiving in the AFR the past couple of weeks.
Hmm, it's been pretty quiet here, so I assume those posters who canned AFG have gone on to can another stock.
Thanks to Allco and it's return to form, I'm back to where I was prior to the recent crash. I've also got a bunch of their shares, which based on their 07 dividend will potentially give me a 30% return on dividends alone. The cherry on top is the 100% return I made on my investment in little over a week.
To put it in context, Allco was at $6 early January. My prediction is, once their results are released on the 15th of February, the price will shoot up near the $6 level again. I think the fact that AFGs margin lenders have agreed to hold off selling more shares means that AFG have given the lenders a peak at their books to show they are on track and that it will be in everyone's interests to hold the AFG shares until after they are released upon which time the shares will have increased to pre 08 levels.
Another thing to remember is that that AFG didn't own Rubicon back when it hit it's highs. Now they do. If the company can't substantially increase their profits after the acquisition, then they should all retire early and give control to someone who can. (a room full of pre-schoolers for example)
As I said in my previous posts, there simply wasn't a GOOD reason for Allco's massive decline. Sure they hadn't performed well but the stock was cheap and buying the stock had an element of risk but the current market is risky.
Edit. Since composing this E-mail I'm actually better of than I was prior to christmas 07. Go AFG!!!!
How is this stock related to AXQ?
Is it the same company? Cant find a AXQ thread in this forum,...
you could argue and b thankful for the media's sloppiness for having push this stock down so far, it's less than half it's bookval. Unfortunately for me, I was a holder prior, but it means opportunity to pick up more - cup is half full still. Part of the game right?
I've seen many other ASF members bring to our attention this continued sloppy Journalism and think it's nothing short of pathetic. Interestingly the editors don't even bother with a retraction as this sort of thing seems to be becoming the norm for these sorts of Tabloid newspapers.
Edit: I've noticed BNB have also just submitted an announcement that they also aren't creditors to Tricom
Yeah you could. Unfortunately my money was tied up elsewhere. To those who question the media's ability to sway the market you only have to look at the way AFG went today. Stock was nearly 10% down early when the initial article was posted then turned around almost as soon as the second article claimed they didn't lend Tricom money. Finally it closed 3% up.
Nearly 15% movement on sloppy journalism.
I actually have a crazy conspiracy theory that the Fairfax media are hammering AFG in order to make Challenger Financial more attractive. Crazy..... or NOT!
Due to the level of paranoia about this stock I deliberately did not reply yesterday, lest my humble bankroll was accused of trying to sell down this can of worms.
The AFR and Australian just report the facts as they are available.
Basically it has been overvalued, had an opaque management structure and delivered unsustainable riches to the undeserving major holders.
Macquarie and Babcock and Brown are in a similar position and will unwind similarly.
In markets generally, the profits to, and fees taken by, directors , in the long run, are inversely proportional to the stock price. The price eventually corrects for corporate excess.
This has happened with AFG.
gg
Hmmmm, way to sit on the fence. A call to someone at AFG or Tricom would have told the AFR that Allco has NEVER lent money to Tricom so I fail to see how your comment has any value.
Your sort of fence sitting attitude would make sense if AFG was the only share you were bagging but when you bag the likes of MQG & BNB you show how little you know about those two businesses, all of which have been highly profitable for a long long time and will continue to be so when the commodities boom, bubble bursts.
It might pay to take a trip down from Townsville to see what is actually happening in the real world. Business' aren't falling into the ground. There aren't runs on the banks and believe it or not, banks are still more than happy to lend the likes of AFG, BNB & MQG more money for one simple reason; they make money and lots of it and this in turn has helped the banks make record profits year in and year out.
I do agree with you that these sort of business' could benefit from greater transparency and I also agree that AFG's management hasn't done a good job recently (a fact they admitted in their last AGM). It's also obvious that the likes of AFG, BNB & MQG will have a harder time to get the funds that lending institutions have been so keen to give them in the past. One could argue that this will only give share holders more confidence in future business decisions for these sort of businesses.
Finally, I wonder why people like yourself feel the need to post in threads for stocks they obviously don't like. If you don't like the channel, change it, don't sit there complaining about it.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.