OK just say the production for AED as a joint venture partener is 8000 bpd.According to the news it said
"Puffin has been producing between 6,000 and 10,000 barrels a day, less than expected, AED said Jan. 10".
The ann. on 10/Jan also mentioned that it expected to produce about 20,000 barrels a day. So even if with the JV now, the full capacity can go up to 20,000 barrels a day, AED would get only 40% i.e. only 8,000/day which is less than it is getting now? will it mean the profit will be more or less than before the JV????
From my understanding, the JV is great for AED as it can get cash to solve its current problem but not sure if it can increase profit for share holders which reflected by SP????
I am trying to convince myself to hold on to AED???
My reading of AED announcement today is that they will receive AUD600m from Sinopec, when final approval of deal is made.
if final approval is of deal is made, probably will be made, it looks pretty simple, deal and company survives, no deal and going concern becomes a real concern to many investors.
Yes, Oil is always on demand but would AED worth that much per share? if you do some research and look at the P/E ratio for AED, it is about 128 while the sector is 22.74 and all ord. is 12.36.
The below is From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) of a stock (also called its "earnings multiple", or simply "multiple", "P/E", or "PE") is a measure of the price paid for a share relative to the annual income or profit earned by the firm per share.[2] A higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of income. It is a valuation ratio included in other financial ratios. The reciprocal of the P/E ratio is known as the earnings yield.[3]
The price per share (numerator) is the market price of a single share of the stock. The earnings per share (denominator) is the net income of the company for the most recent 12 month period, divided by number of shares outstanding. The earnings per share (EPS) used can also be the "diluted EPS" or the "comprehensive EPS". The P/E ratio can also be calculated by dividing the company's market capitalization by its total annual earnings.
For example, if stock A is trading at $24 and the earnings per share for the most recent 12 month period is $3, then stock A has a P/E ratio of 24/3 or 8. Put another way, the purchaser of stock A is paying $8 for every dollar of earnings. Companies with losses (negative earnings) or no profit have an undefined P/E ratio (usually shown as Not applicable or "N/A"); sometimes, however, a negative P/E ratio may be shown.
By comparing price and earnings per share for a company, one can analyze the market's stock valuation of a company and its shares relative to the income the company is actually generating.[citation needed] Investors can use the P/E ratio to compare the value of stocks: if one stock has a P/E twice that of another stock, all things being equal (especially the earnings growth rate), it is a less attractive investment. Companies are rarely equal, however, and comparisons between industries, companies, and time periods may be misleading.
Dropped from $1.85 to $1.62 in the closing auction for some reason. Hope someone doesnt know something we dont.
Cheers
OK just say the production for AED as a joint venture partener is 8000 bpd.
AED is now cashed up with all debts paid. Their oil price is hedged at US$77per barrel for the next 6 months, extraction costs are $25/bl leaving $52 in the bank. 8000 times $52 equals $416000.00 per day, or$151.84million per year. That is earnings per share of $1.00 net approximately assuming oil does not increase in value.
Note that the US military are budgeting on oil at $225pbl.
Dont panic.
In fact you can walk around with a big smile on your face
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?