- Joined
- 10 April 2007
- Posts
- 240
- Reactions
- 0
Good to see we can have a really friendly and intelligent discussion about the pros and cons of this stock.Chops a Must equates to Toss a Lot.
Your typical Dockers supporter really......bitter and twisted that gets off on slagging others.
It's been dragging awhile now ADI holders, but worth riding.
An idiot wouldn't have seen his profit cut in half, that's for sure.******************
It seems like that chops is an alias of that other idiot on ADVFN namely Robin of no advice?
How dare you post about clearly trending stocks that chops has been on for ages!!Hi All,
My first post here. I am relatively new to the world of trading despite having worked in the O & G sector for some years. I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for their insight, and that I personally have faith in ADI. Try holding GDN...
At work we are tipping Arrow Energy and LNG in Gladstone, based on industry chatter. I also got in on ESG which has been nice and steady...if you like weird ideas though...you will love Linc Energy! LNC...seems to be heading in the right direction...
... just a bearish challenge for the thread given it tends to be very bullish at times (not a bad thing!) ... i haven't read anywhere in any of ADI's presentations that it intends to drill 16 wells.... only 2 more shallow wells in 2007(8?)... further they're running with a P50 reserves estimate of 100Bcf on SL (which is good - and possibly conservative given ADI acreage acquisition activity)... but is still subject to test... reserves can't be booked until there is physical evidence to do so - ADI/JV would only have wireline logs at this stage... and maybe some pressure data... that's not enough.. not saying that any of the bullish stuff is not possible... but it's just that at this stage - a possibility -and i don't believe that the SP should contain alot of value for that until further info. comes into the market... good luck to adi holders on NT next week - hope the frac is successful...
Good to see we can have a really friendly and intelligent discussion about the pros and cons of this stock.
An idiot wouldn't have seen his profit cut in half, that's for sure.
How dare you post about clearly trending stocks that chops has been on for ages!!
And Agentm, we can talk about the potential blah blah until the cows come home. 1tcf this, 1 tcf that. ESG has what, 1.5tcf gas in place with highly encouraging preliminary results and huge contracts already in place. ADI may have the same, minus whatever the other companies cut. But that's meaningless. What does tell you a lot is the trend, and insider buying. All that the volume has done for ADI is to bring the stock down since March. With no serious boys coming to play, to help out.
But... I suppose all the "keep the faith on SL or dust cake", whatever the well is called, mass private messages will be arriving in the inboxes of the faithful towards the end of the week. Good luck, and if it doesn't fail with stale bulls at 80c, it'll be interesting. I wouldn't hold my breath though.
It's fine.how is that chip on your shoulder chops? you'd best hope that Sugarloaf is a duster or it could be unbearable. Some advice for you, don't get emotional about stocks. ADI obviously didn't work out for you, better luck next time.
I just make a point of challenging spruikers and rampers (particularly like today when a blatant untruth is told), no matter what I hold or what I don't.
WOW!!
You'd think with all the hot air and energy being generated here that it would attract more attention in the outside world.
Think rational guys, it's only money, and you can't take it with you.
"I ask you chance of fate, why can ADI get a workover rig and frac crew on site at NT in a matter of weeks and it takes 6 months for one to be at sugarloaf.."
######################
agentm,
Are they stalling until Jul so that they can assess the results of the next well in Block A together with the SL 1 well testing program?
TCEI are the Operator for SL & a partner in the Block A program with the major.
you crack me up on every post..
i was wondering how difficult it is to have a JVP partner proclaim they are in another JVP on the same play and investing in 16 wells across both plays, so on those wells alone $80 mill is being invested. It caused some constination with AUT and EKA with denials of knowlege of the major oil company, and saying more will be revealed when testing is completed.
what really shakes the boat is that EME claims they are on block A and B, then we have ADI not supporting that. But stating the number of wells will be revealed only afetr testing SL..
I still maintain the EME move to run with TCE in the other block on the same play on the next well, which makes it the third well to go if you count the one that they refer to as already producing, and with 15 more at least planned until testing is completed, it seems a touch excessive for a 150bcf play?
ADI and all the JVP's have indicated reserves will be adjusted once testing is completed, using data from 3 wells will certainly fill the picture for them..
Agentm,
The deep sands are still in the mix in the medium term according to both EME & AUT who are snapping up deals & land at Block A & Longhorn and Ipanema resp. EME have planned 16 wells minimum so far, so plenty of opportunities there. Could be considerably more if they drill separate wells for each production zone.
EME mentioned 9% porosity in their annuals which is surely too tempting not to have another pop at some point down the line?
These are the relevant extracts:-
“Significant gas shows reappeared at 18,190' following the interception of the primary objective, the Hosston sandstones at 17,950'. These gas shows continued intermittently throughout the sequence until the total depth (T.D.) of 20,896' was reached on the 28th November 2006. The logs run at TD show a net pay of between 90 - 140' over an interval 1,700' (19,700' - 18,000') using a 6% porosity cut-off. The most prospective sand was 17' thick showing a calculated porosity of 9%.”
“There are several reasons which can explain the absence of significant gas flow, despite the shows during drilling. The most likely explanation is the lack of sufficient permeability due to the fine-grained nature of the sandstones. The deleterious effects of using heavy mud weight (15.6 lbs/gal) by necessity could also have played a role in impeding gas flow”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?