I feel like this is part of the problem that adds to peoples perception of bias, the government of the day is always going to draw more media attention than the opposition, after all they are the ones that by and large implement policy in this country. It's not the norm for oppositions outside of election cycles to outline their policy platform, so one would expect that outside of election periods the government of the day is going to be under a greater microscope than the opposition. The last 22 years has seen the coalition govern for 16 of those, naturally they are going to receive a greater coverage than the opposition and thus the perception of bias is there. Perhaps if someone can prove that during 2007-2013 the Libs had more coverage critical of their policies than Labor did then they would have a point but I very much doubt that to be the case.
As for selling off the ABC and being left to media organisations with no charter that requires them to remain impartial, well it's a long way down that rabbit hole, the result is media like Fox news in the US this week that actually edited out the laughter at Donald Trump during his speech to UN world leaders. I guess some might find this their utopian society.
As for selling off the ABC and being left to media organisations with no charter that requires them to remain impartial, well it's a long way down that rabbit hole, the result is media like Fox news in the US this week that actually edited out the laughter at Donald Trump during his speech to UN world leaders. I guess some might find this their utopian society.