Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

ABC is Political

Jump to new
I don't agree with privatising the ABC but neither do I agree with it pushing a social agenda of gay parenting onto children as though it is acceptable in society.

It's not acceptable to a lot of people and Play School should keep out of that area.
 
Tink said:
“Play School is not the place for the ABC to run agendas.

Parents should be able to trust their toddlers to the ABC’s Play School program without worrying if they are being exposed to controversial political and social agendas,

“Parents should not be forced to explain to little children how it is that two men come to have a baby

Play School yesterday announced it would feature two men raising a child in its popular Through the Windows segment.

“It is disappointing that the ABC is seeking to impose rainbow politics on toddlers when millions of their parents do not agree with redefining marriage in law.

“Millions of Australians also do not agree that two men should be allowed to deliberately deprive a child of its mother. This does not mean two men can not love a child, of course they can. The issue is whether or not it is right for the child to be deprived of its mother and whether this should be taught as ethical to toddlers.

“The ABC should also not assume that producing children through harvested eggs and a rented or donated woman’s womb to meet the desires of two men is a public good.

“Unsupervised watching of Play School was always considered safe by generations of parents. Now parents can’t be sure if their children are going to be exposed to contested social and political agendas.

The Australian people will be deciding whether or not marriage (and with it parenting) is redefined in a national plebiscite after the federal election, should the Coalition win.

“Many parents will be disappointed with this, particularly as this is a taxpayer-funded program that should refrain from pushing confusing adult messaging to our children.

“Parent’s shouldn’t be forced to have adult conversations about sexuality and bioethics with their kids at such a young age and it certainly should not be the government broadcaster raising the subject with them.”

The nature of the ABC as a taxpayer-funded broadcaster meant that it should maintain its objectivity on political issues, particularly when matters crucial to the definition of marriage and family are subject to a national vote.

“ABC Kids in particular should be particularly sensitive to what it shows to young impressionable minds and refrain from introducing contested social concepts into their children’s programing


Play School segment to feature gay fathers
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/play-school-segment-to-feature-gay-fathers-20160204-gmlko0.html
Click to expand...



One thing I will say about that ACL piece is that when my kids were toddlers the various mothers in my circle would watch it religiously to see John's double entendres... the kids must have picked up on John making mummy happy. But he was clever enough not to hijack the show to engineer a generation to accept unnatural pairing, religions, etc
 
SirRumpole said:
I don't agree with privatising the ABC but neither do I agree with it pushing a social agenda of gay parenting onto children as though it is acceptable in society.

It's not acceptable to a lot of people and Play School should keep out of that area.
Click to expand...

If the ABC is privatized it may root out the Fabians who run the show....But then again if it was privatized, the Fabians might take it over which in turn would be funded by the LUG party......The propaganda machine would be in full swing to promote socialism.....

No not a good idea to privatize....leave it under the limited control of the government.
 
noco said:
If the ABC is privatized it may root out the Fabians who run the show....But then again if it was privatized, the Fabians might take it over which in turn would be funded by the LUG party......The propaganda machine would be in full swing to promote socialism.....

No not a good idea to privatize....leave it under the limited control of the government.
Click to expand...

Actually a good idea. They don't know how to run a business (that is not govt. sponsored) and therefore a good businessman will pick it up cheap. Problem solved.
 
dutchie said:
Actually a good idea. They don't know how to run a business (that is not govt. sponsored) and therefore a good businessman will pick it up cheap. Problem solved.
Click to expand...

I seem to recall Trades Hall used to own quite a few radio stations, so the ABC might be a good fit for them... the ABC being a nursery for demons, gremlins, griffins, etc it would be a hand in glove fit and a triumph for free enterprise.
 
Was he a lefty in July last year when Alan Jones presented himself as an alternative chair warmer when Fuhrer Abbott declared verboten to any of his ministers attending. Alan actually morphed into a kind off intelligent person with reasoned argument, not at all like the usual LNP fare.
 
Tisme said:
Was he a lefty in July last year when Alan Jones presented himself as an alternative chair warmer when Fuhrer Abbott declared verboten to any of his ministers attending. Alan actually morphed into a kind off intelligent person with reasoned argument, not at all like the usual LNP fare.
Click to expand...

Maybe, but he did get some data about wind farms rather wrong.

:cautious:
 
SirRumpole said:
So don't watch it.
Click to expand...

I don't and neither does a lot of others....I just stated, I could not be bothered watching and as I said before it is the Fabian Society propaganda machine for the LUG party....It is the socialist way of controlling the naive and they swallow it hook, line and sinker.
 
noco said:
I don't and neither does a lot of others....I just stated, I could not be bothered watching and as I said before it is the Fabian Society propaganda machine for the LUG party....It is the socialist way of controlling the naive and they swallow it hook, line and sinker.
Click to expand...

Some prefer to swallow Murdoch and Bolt's propaganda, hook line and sinker.
 
The bullying arrogance of Kerryn Phelps was staggering. Physician heal thyself!

Phelps and Anna Burke were heckling the poor guy from Christian Lobby in stereo, not a pretty sight..
 
The question from the "innocent" child was fairly disturbing.

It seemed that she wanted to shut down the whole gay marriage debate because a few people like her may not like what was being said.

It seems fairly typical of the gay lobby that they send out their trophy foot soldiers to put their case rather than having the guts to do it themselves.

This is an adult debate that should be discussed by adults and not shut down for perceived "offense", the opinions of children who are still dependent on their parents are irrelevant.
 
Logique said:
The bullying arrogance of Kerryn Phelps was staggering. Physician heal thyself!

Phelps and Anna Burke were heckling the poor guy from Christian Lobby in stereo, not a pretty sight..
Click to expand...

Going against my principles of watching QandA, It did watch some until I became totally disgusted at the way Karan Phelps, Anna Burke and the predominately stacked left wing audience heckled Lyle Shelton...When Phelps spoke there overwhelming cheering and clapping as opposed to when Shelton spoke he was ridiculed.

This is an age old method by Marxist, Communist or Fabians, what ever you want to call them, to not only to ruin a countries economy as we saw between 2007 and 2013 but also to break down the morals of young people by clouding their minds with sex.

And of course the Catholic religion is not condoned by the Fabians, let alone other religions with exception of Islam, and they would rather see religion squashed.

1726 Catholic schools out of 1728 have rejected the latest system of sex education in schools.

Wake up Australia and stop these demons from promoting their extreme propaganda.




http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opi...m/news-story/4cb53ec9a0779aba50e30275b83ce01a

Safe schools do not advise children how to access a sex shop site online. They do not teach children that virginity is a subjective concept. They do not instruct children to imagine they have no genitals — arguably a form of dissociation.

Yet the Safe Schools Coalition “All of Us” program, defended by Queer activist groups and the Left media, continues to receive government funding while promoting highly questionable sexual activism on the curriculum.

On Monday night’s Q&A, Australian Christian Lobby managing director Lyle Shelton argued against the Safe Schools Coalition program in response to a question by Cella White, a mother who withdrew her children from Frankston High School because of it. He attempted to evince his position by exposing radical elements of the program, but the audience looked bemused, as though it were a fiction. What they failed to grasp is the critical distinction between Queer, a term used as shorthand for the gay community and Queer politics, a radical movement that marked the rise of neo-Marxism in the realm of sexuality.

Consistent with neo-Marxist minority politics, the Safe Schools Coalition program has been funded on the rationale of victimhood. Ostensibly a program to counter bullying of youth who identify as lesbian, gay, intersex or transgender, it has been accepted in schools across Victoria with federal and Labor state government funding. But the program is not simply a defence of lesbian and gay youth, basic respect, or human equality. Its co-founder Roz Ward has admitted it is part of a Marxist social change strategy. We should be worried about the change to come, given program resources include practices associated with Queer politics such as sex industry shops, chest-binding and penis-tucking.
 
Damn the ABC for its continued bias; now the Four Corners program is pointing fingers at the Banks and Insurance Industry ripping off customers.

Let's hope the Royal Commission that will come is as keen for scalps as it was for the Unions and not a cynical exercise like the Abuse of Children has been.
 
What are Clemmie Fords's qualifications to appear, for the second time, on ABC Q&A?

Panellists this week, Monday, 21 March 2016:
Daniel Andrews, Premier of Victoria; Jacqui Lambie, Independent Senator for Tasmania; Josh Frydenberg, Minister for Resources and Energy; Elizabeth Proust, Businesswoman and Chair, Bank of Melbourne.

And..Clementine Ford, Fairfax blogger and feminist speaker. The tattoed one.

What businesses has she run, what Senatorial posts occupied, which banks has she worked for, which Federal Ministerial posts occupied, which State has she governed.

Presumably she was there as political commissar, and along the way, to take a cowardly swipe at Peter Dutton.

This is Their ABC.
 
Logique said:
What are Clemmie Fords's qualifications to appear, for the second time, on ABC Q&A?

Panellists this week, Monday, 21 March 2016:
Daniel Andrews, Premier of Victoria; Jacqui Lambie, Independent Senator for Tasmania; Josh Frydenberg, Minister for Resources and Energy; Elizabeth Proust, Businesswoman and Chair, Bank of Melbourne.

And..Clementine Ford, Fairfax blogger and feminist speaker. The tattoed one.

What businesses has she run, what Senatorial posts occupied, which banks has she worked for, which Federal Ministerial posts occupied, which State has she governed.

Presumably she was there as political commissar, and along the way, to take a cowardly swipe at Peter Dutton.

This is Their ABC.
Click to expand...

Agree about Clementine Ford. People make a few "contraversial" remarks and suddenly they are celebrities worthy of further listening to.

CF has shown she is a foul mouthed whinger , but looking at the show in hindsight I thought she didn't do too badly. However there are many more ladies much more capable of representing a female view than she is,
 
Top