- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
I am not here to carry a candle for Montgomery.
While I am not aware of his returns at Clime, I accept your claim that they were poor. But do we know the extent of his responsibility for that performance?
He was founder, chairman and MD. It was his firm.
When all is said and done, I think that it's fairer to judge Montgomery's record now that he is running his own investment firm. Also, the older fund that you refer to has returned just over 16.5% after all fees since 2010, not 12.8%: http://www.montinvest.com/apply-to-i...y-private-fund.
No. He returned 12.8%. The returns are compounded. At 16.5% his total return from inception would be ~114%. His return on his newer fund is ~19.5%, not 25%.
I might add too that it's possible - just possible - that Montgomery is a better investor now than he was at Clime. He is probably not more than 45 years old and investment is something you get better at the longer and more thoughtfully you do it.
Sure it's possible.