So once it became apparent the guarantee was not going to be called, why the need to transfer the entire amount being guaranteed to provision impairment loss? It should just disappear off the balance sheet shouldn't it?
It’s been a while since I looked at API but from memory the deal is that guarantees to third parties are only issued with a corresponding agreement that any guarantee expenses are recoverable from the pharmacists.
So the other side of the Initial guarantee provision is to receivables to simultaneously recognise the pharmacist’s obligation.
Over time and to the extent that guarantee expenses look like not actually arising –neither does the pharmacists obligation. So the transaction becomes a decrease to the guarantee provision and increase in provision against receivables.
When the guarantee finally lapses – Just contra off the receivables against its associated provision which should already have a net zero balance. (from the above entry)
Happy Easter.