Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
This being pretty much what the government has in mind, in fact.I agree. It would be much more equitable to have Stephen Conroy (Ministry of Truth) dictating policy to News Ltd.![]()
This being pretty much what the government has in mind, in fact.I agree. It would be much more equitable to have Stephen Conroy (Ministry of Truth) dictating policy to News Ltd.![]()
Take it up with him then. I assume you are referring to Bob Brown, scourge of the Hate Media...Control of a large section of it by a single organisation controlled by one man who can limit what appears in his media to ideas that benefit himself or his organisation.
I agree. It would be much more equitable to have Stephen Conroy (Ministry of Truth) dictating policy to News Ltd.![]()
Take it up with him then. I assume you are referring to Bob Brown, scourge of the Hate Media.
Glad you agree. I thought you were one of those loony right wingers !
![]()
Does Bob Brown own controlling interests in media companies ?
Just goes to show you shouldn't rush to judgment, considering you have only been on the forum 5 minutes.
If Finklestein gets his way he will have a controlling interest without owning anything. It called censorship.
How shocking that people should have a say in how the media presents issues
Oh! It's the people now is it? Since when did Bob Brown become the people?![]()
You and Starry are soulmates already:remybussi
Thanks dutchie,
The Greens and the ALP are trying to muzzle News Corporation, so it is good to have you onside advocating freedom of speech against the voracious controlling instincts of the Left.
gg
Just watch or listen to the ABC (ALP News 24 is a cracker) and the SBS , or read a Fairfax newspaper.Are you sure about the Greens? I thought it was the other way around. Evidence???
News Ltd by contrast, owns 32% of newspaper titles in Australia. These are profitable publications, because people living outside of Fitzroy and Carlton, Balmain and Glebe - trust them.
Except for one thing. The polls showing a pro-Labor bias were from… wait for it… 1966 and and 1976. That’s right, they are decades old. Yet they are in the same section as debate on climate change, and used later on as justification for this regulatory regime.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.