- Joined
- 14 November 2005
- Posts
- 1,319
- Reactions
- 12
I was at the G too. Good performance. Collingwood didn't play poorly I thought, they were made to play ordinary and Essendon had a few passengers.
I thought so as well. The result showed that Essendon aren't as bad as some might have thought, and Collingwood aren't as good as some might think.
It bugs me the way all the commentators refer to the "Collingwood Press" as some radical new trend in football. Haven't they just tweaked the game plan of the Brisbane Lions in 2002-4 and Geelong in 2007-09? Like those teams they have an absolutely brilliant midfield, more than competent rucks, an attacking, dangerous and flexible forward line and a stingy, serviceable backline. Add to this Collingwood is also blessed with depth as was Brisbane and Geelong.The final piece of the puzzle is "teamwork and having a solid game plan and sticking to it".
Sometimes I think the football community looks too deeply into things. Collingwood are a good side playing well - but they are no more pioneers who have forever changed the way AFL is played, than Geelong and Brisbane before them.
As for the Bombers game against West Coast - Essendon isn't the only team that have improved. They did what they needed to do. Good quality game.
The midfield have been our big improvers. We now have quality disposals coming into the forward line. Stanton, Prismall, Dyson being the main offenders from prior years. Hocking, Watson and Winderlich have all improved.
Duckman