What happened to the supposedly 25 other interested parties who got nowhere close to doing due dilligence? Not forgetting some of those intereted parties were dealing with MS Hutson in her capacity as advisor to Chris Scott. Ms Hutson could well find herself in a spot of bother here!!.Today's SMH headline "MFS adviser had benefit of inside knowledge" is certainly a sign that many questions we have been asking for ages will soon be heard on a public scale.
Remember this article::
http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/19/plus-ca-change-conflicts-continue-at-octaviar/
Hutson also told the AFR that “no one got anywhere near doing due diligence [and that] the majority of the [Octaviar] board at the time this decision was made has the benefit of considering each of the alternatives that were put forward.” The fact that no other parties completed due diligence doesn’t exactly shore up the governance aspect. Octaviar shareholders may legitimately question why no other parties conducted due diligence: Was it because Octaviar’s fund managements business is such a mess that no one else would touch it, or did no one else get a look in?
Seamisty