This article is worth a read::http://www.smh.com.au/business/mult...estors-after-class-action-20100721-10kyn.html
''It represents a great outcome for investors generally because it sends a message to corporate boardrooms throughout the country that people who do not comply with their continuous disclosure obligations will pay, and they'll pay big time,'' he told reporters.
Mr Watson said the settlement also represented a victory because the compensation achieved was 20 times greater than what participants in the class action would have obtained had they accepted a settlement offer made by Multiplex under an Australian and Securities Investment Commission (ASIC) enforceable undertaking in 2007.
Mr Watson said the case established three important principles - that class actions work, litigation funding provides access to justice, and the ASIC settlement was inadequate.
''It represents a great outcome for investors generally because it sends a message to corporate boardrooms throughout the country that people who do not comply with their continuous disclosure obligations will pay, and they'll pay big time,'' he told reporters.
Mr Watson said the settlement also represented a victory because the compensation achieved was 20 times greater than what participants in the class action would have obtained had they accepted a settlement offer made by Multiplex under an Australian and Securities Investment Commission (ASIC) enforceable undertaking in 2007.
Mr Watson said the case established three important principles - that class actions work, litigation funding provides access to justice, and the ASIC settlement was inadequate.