Whiskers
It's a small world
- Joined
- 21 August 2007
- Posts
- 3,266
- Reactions
- 1
Hi Jessica
You had a hit today, didn't you!?
:
That's why you have lost interest in continuing our discussion today. That's OK, tomorrow will do.
Remember earlier you were telling me how you monitor the effects. All the things you have said earlier, about small doses and doing it in company in case something goes wrong etc, is all good sense.
You said:
You seem to have a subjective benchmark that works for you. I'm just trying to establish some objective benchmarks to work off, that I can replicate, because I happen to believe that abolition won't work either.
Many chemicals metabolise or pass through our system, but some don't and either progressively accumulate in our body or progessively damage our body with more exposure... like some diseases. This is the little, but important bit of how to monitor the effects that I am not clear about.
Take someone who suffers from dementia for example. They cannot make a subjective assessement of themself for dementia. They are usually the last to know. I mean I couldn't even 'subjectively' determine that I had a melanoma until it was nearly too late. High cholesterol and high blood pressure even many cancers are not detectable subjectively. We have to do some sort of objective tests. For example I've had a brain scan and neurological tests to check for disease or effects from a concussion, so I have an objective assessement that tells exactly what condition my brain and nervous system is in... and heart and eyesight etc.
Can you see what I mean here Jecssica? I'm interested in what objective tests you do or are considering to monitor the effects of your dosage rates.
You had a hit today, didn't you!?
That's why you have lost interest in continuing our discussion today. That's OK, tomorrow will do.
I guess at the end of the day, i'll keep doing what i do and you'll keep doing what you do.
Life rolls on........................we are both happy doing as we do.
The fun police will keep banging on about how people shouldn't do this and how they should do that and drug use will grow expodentially, nothing will change and nothing will be resolved.
What can you do hey?
JW![]()
Remember earlier you were telling me how you monitor the effects. All the things you have said earlier, about small doses and doing it in company in case something goes wrong etc, is all good sense.
You said:
I made sure i had a good undertanding of what each drug did before i took it. Well, i know from experience now.
You seem to have a subjective benchmark that works for you. I'm just trying to establish some objective benchmarks to work off, that I can replicate, because I happen to believe that abolition won't work either.
Many chemicals metabolise or pass through our system, but some don't and either progressively accumulate in our body or progessively damage our body with more exposure... like some diseases. This is the little, but important bit of how to monitor the effects that I am not clear about.
Take someone who suffers from dementia for example. They cannot make a subjective assessement of themself for dementia. They are usually the last to know. I mean I couldn't even 'subjectively' determine that I had a melanoma until it was nearly too late. High cholesterol and high blood pressure even many cancers are not detectable subjectively. We have to do some sort of objective tests. For example I've had a brain scan and neurological tests to check for disease or effects from a concussion, so I have an objective assessement that tells exactly what condition my brain and nervous system is in... and heart and eyesight etc.
Can you see what I mean here Jecssica? I'm interested in what objective tests you do or are considering to monitor the effects of your dosage rates.