Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,887
- Reactions
- 6,906
WOW...
Sold Dicksmith for some lose change of $20m.
DickSmith had HY sales of $873m and EBIT of $19.5m. So the equity was worth 0.5x full year EBIT
Not sure how the future upside works, or how much debt is within the Dicksmith unit. But it really isn't a large number, is it?!
FWIW, JBH trades at 5.5x, although direct comparison isn't fair due to the unknowns.
Ask yourself a question. If you are in an Australian city, any city, that you are not familiar with then would you need to actually ask someone for directions to a Coles or Woolworths store?The stat I've highlighted I think has more to do with the saturation of supermarkets. Realistically, how long can you build supermarkets for in a country that was already well served?
There is some good results coming soon. Grant O'Brian has some please number, with supermarkets and liquor showing some great growth. 62c fully franked dividend coming up.
Anchorage, which bought Dick Smith from Woolworths for $20 million last September, appointed Goldman Sachs and Macquarie last month to explore sale options, including an IPO valuing the chain at between $550 million – $620 million. Feedback from fund managers has been positive, with the recent rollout of Dick Smith departments in 29 David Jones stores further pushing the name into the spotlight. Dick Smith earned $80 million before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation in the 12 months ending June, compared with $36 million EBITDA in its last year under Woolworths. The company has previously outlined to fund managers that it plans to open 77 stores over three years, expanding the network to 400 stores.
Wow (pardon the pun)...
So either WOW didn't know how to run this thing or Anchorage have played a masterstroke.
Wow (pardon the pun)...
So either WOW didn't know how to run this thing or Anchorage have played a masterstroke.
Agreement structure wow will get a fare share of the float ...they sold at that price to attract turn around specialist and participate on the up side ...no Wow isn't that stupid -
skc said:Or Anchorage has done a great job dressing things up. It's only been 12 months so it's hard confidently believe such turnaround as sustainable. May be there were one-off savings to be had, large reduction in cap ex, may be lower inventory / working capital... the usual bag of tricks in any private equity turnaround game.
I can feel a MYR all over again.
The alliance with David Jones is not going to deliver much imo. Their respective market positions are quite different - DJS supposed to be more premium (are they anymore?) and in DickSmith they stock lower end brands. I don't think you can even buy a Sony TV at DickSmith. And who goes to David Jones to buy electronics? Only boyfriends/husbands who left their wives shopping in the clothes section. So you might pick up a few impulse buys on small ticket items, but much of the floor space are wasted with TVs and laptops that simply won't sell well imo.
Australia's two biggest supermarket chains Woolworths and Coles continue to punch above their weight, cementing their place among the world's top 20 retailers.
Masters are losing cash every day with WOW propping them up, they are saying Masters wont even begin to turn a profit for another 3 years or around 2017. As we know those sort of forecasts can be misleading, so it wouldn't surprise me if its longer. Can WOW afford to lose another 300 million + over the next 3 years (or more!) on Masters or do they think of a different strategy? (yes they can afford it but will they let it happen?)
I'm not a fan of the Masters strategy either with placement of stores, if anyone has noticed most of the new stores have a Bunnings directly opposite or 100m down the road, it just doesn't make business sense to open a "poor mans Bunnings" next to all the Bunnings stores! If Bunnings was a bad performer then yeah good idea, but its a very solid performer..
My guess is they will throw cash away for another 2 years, then stop building new stores...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?