So_Cynical
The Contrarian Averager
- Joined
- 31 August 2007
- Posts
- 7,466
- Reactions
- 1,468
biggest mistake to make - letting your buy price be an anchor.
Capital is to be protected. Looses need to be minimised and wins need to be run hard.
And yet loss of some sort is an absolute certainty, i think there are ways to minimise losses that don't include accepting them, as strange as that sounds.
Lets look at an example of that theory.
Market darling BHP is currently at the same price now that it was in June 2007.
Since then it has paid $5.84 per share in dividends.
Taking into account the dividend and CPI you would have achieved about 3.94% pa for six years on your investment.
I am aware that if you go back a further 6 years then you will capture the pre GFC and mining boom era but if you want to think long term starting now do you expect a repeat ?
Not saying that your theory is wrong, you are correct that it is easier but how effective for the future I have doubts about.
Just my
Lets expand on that example....chart show ample time after 2007 to profit, in fact a random sell point would be very likely to result in a profit and a stop loss once in 12% profit would guarantee it.
~