- Joined
- 20 January 2008
- Posts
- 530
- Reactions
- 1
just as quickly if you teach yourself by reading a lot and practising a lot?
can you become just as proficient just as quickly if you teach yourself by reading a lot and practising a lot?
I have been a member of this forum for over a year now and have learnt much. I am very grateful to the many contributors who spend a lot of time giving insightful posts related to how they trade as well as general trading discussion. One thing i often think about when i read various posts is how has this person become so knowledgeable about the trading game.
Is it possible to become a consistently profitable and knowledgeable trader without any formal education or without working at a trading organisation such as Propex? I suspect many would answer definitely yes to this. The subsequent question would be are you better off to get a formal education (e.g. economics degree, finance degree, diploma in technical analysis, etc) and / or work for a trading organisation? Will you become a profitable trader and more knowledgeable trader quicker if you do this or can you become just as proficient just as quickly if you teach yourself by reading a lot and practising a lot?
... it's about finding your own edge.
There is no magic answer, you can learn all the patterns you want, all the different methods, trying to hit high win % or trying to get large winners. Where your targets are, where your stops will be etc etc etc. All depends on the market. This is where you have to adapt, and adapting becomes part of your edge. If your trying to run winners in a choppy market, you are not going to do well for example.
See I disagree you need a mentor (and I think this is one of the biggest myths around now).
If you are trying to emulate a style, then yes. For James, this is Frank D.
But other than that, it's about finding your own edge.
There is no magic answer, you can learn all the patterns you want, all the different methods, trying to hit high win % or trying to get large winners. Where your targets are, where your stops will be etc etc etc. All depends on the market. This is where you have to adapt, and adapting becomes part of your edge. If your trying to run winners in a choppy market, you are not going to do well for example.
This is the hard part, everyone wants an easy, fool proof method. And there is no such thing. Be innovative, be creative and don't be afriad to go against what feels safe or natural human behaviour (or follow a creative method such as Frank D), other than that, using what is easy and what 99% of others use, will just see you become one of the herd.
That's my opinion anyways.
Perhaps you have a different definition of mentor than I do.
I view a mentor merely as support, guidance and pointing you in the right direction, again and again and again.
.
Beer I see you are are still in the reading and believing books phase.Based on my little equation i'd say all you need is an open/adaptable/no bias/disciplined mind. - which is hard enough in itself.
See this is where I've come to disagree with the term for mentor for anything other than purely showing you their style and you trying to imitate.
Other than that, it is impossible to 'point you in the right direction and provide guidance', . . .
Beer I see you are are still in the reading and believing books phase.:
personally, i think i've learnt all i need to... but i guess i thought that when i first started too. so i continue on.
enjoying the ride
Perhaps showing you their style is enough.
Noob: Tell me Mr Guru Trader, why are you so good at trading?
Guru Trader: I make good decisions.
N: How do you know what a good decision is?
GT: Experience.
N: How do you acquire experience?
GT: From making bad decisions!
Baboom.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?