This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

Status
Not open for further replies.

 
You certainly know how to "poison the well" don't you Dutchie ?

That was a particularly choice piece of filth mate.

Zero truth. Maximum destruction of peoples lives.

Maximum destruction of respect for the 25 people who have publicly noted their rape/assault/abuse experience at the hands of the current President of the United States.

The story I quoted asked just that question. How is it that these days any accustion against Donald Trump, no matter how well supported by evidence, is disregarded and the person who was abused is vilified. ?

And on cue you throw up a prime example of such behaviour. Classy ...not..
 
You are so funny basilio.
25? Statistically you would have thought one of them would have stuck.
 
The World According To Trump
Donald “Grab ’Em by the Pussy” Trump Thinks People Should Be Fired for Disrespecting Women
Yet somehow he remains employed.

By Bess Levin

.... Trump has not said if he’ll be resigning from the office of the presidency in light of the rape allegation against him, or if he’s decided to provide a DNA sample to E. Jean Carroll’s lawyers to see if it matches the genetic material on the dress she says she was wearing when he allegedly assaulted her in a dressing room in the ’90s. Or if he still thinks it’s acceptable to grab women by the genitals, or kiss women without their consent, or “moving on” them “like a bitch.” Perhaps he’ll address such issues in a follow-up tweet.

 

I wonder what you and your communist friends are going to throw at the Supreme Court nominee if it's a woman?
 
I wonder what you and your communist friends are going to throw at the Supreme Court nominee if it's a woman?
How about just following the Senate Republician precedent set in 2018 and defer the decision until after the election ?
And you can get rid of the lying, gratuitous political slurs as well Dutchie. It doesn't become this forum.
 
You put up the guy that was a known liar. Who helped spy on a candidate for potus. Pretty sure that whole investigation is bigger then the toss trash you dug up.
 
How about just following the Senate Republician precedent set in 2018 and defer the decision until after the election ?
And you can get rid of the lying, gratuitous political slurs as well Dutchie. It doesn't become this forum.
She was free to retire under Obama at 80 years old. She didn't. Obama wasn't in control of the senate so any pick he made was likely not going to happen.

The lying crap that happened during kavanaugh was disgusting. Democrats deserve zero concessions.
 
How about just following the Senate Republician precedent set in 2018 and defer the decision until after the election ?
And you can get rid of the lying, gratuitous political slurs as well Dutchie. It doesn't become this forum.

Genius Trump Nominates Joe Biden To Supreme Court Forcing Dems To Accuse Him Of Sexual Assault
September 20th, 2020

857Shares
662SHARE
89SHARE
SHARE
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Trump has announced his pick for Supreme Court justice: Joe Biden. By nominating Biden, Trump has forced the Dems' hands, making them believe the sexual assault claims and allegations of inappropriate, creepy behavior against the former vice president.

The "4D chess" move forced Dems to immediately accuse Joe Biden of sexual assault and reverse their position on the current claims against him.
"We now believe Tara Reade," said a somber Kamala Harris, "and we will do everything in our power to destroy this man's life."
In addition to believing current claims against Joe Biden, Democrats also immediately dug up 417 new accusers against Joe Biden. He has been accused of participating in wild frat parties, drunken keggers, and something called the "Devil's Triangle," which Dems say is either a Satanic ritual or code for a sexual practice or "maybe both."
"It's clear this man is dangerous and cannot be trusted," said Nancy Pelosi. "We call on the Senate to turn down his nomination and run him out of public life."
Biden released a statement, saying, "I just want to go home and see my grandkids again." His mic was cut off and he was pulled off the stage with a shepherd's crook.
 
The death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg just months before the 2020 presidential election sets a political dilemma for some Republican senators, who in 2016 said that Supreme Court vacancies should not be filled near the end of a president's term.
What did they say then ?

 

Republicans - "It's OK to nominate a new Supreme Court Judge just before the election if it suits us."
Democrats - "It's OK to nominate a new Supreme Court Judge just before the election if it suits us."
 
It all depends who holds the senate. If dems held the senate then their pick would have got green lighted.

But they didn't, so they had zero chance. And ended up on a permawhinge ever since.

Trump still needs 1 of the 3 rinos to vote or it won't go through.
 
Republicans - "It's OK to nominate a new Supreme Court Judge just before the election if it suits us."
Democrats - "It's OK to nominate a new Supreme Court Judge just before the election if it suits us."

Untrue. In any way, shape or form.

Republicans undermined the process of replacing Supreme Court judges when they died by refusing to even hear President Obamas nominee in March 2016. Hand on heart they said the Nation should have a voice in deciding the next judge by blocking the process.

In 2020, less than two months before the election with millions of people already voting they are determined to ram through a new Supreme Court judge in a total reversal of their 2016 behaviour.

 

Boo hoo hoo . Only we are good and righteous. Orange man bad. Boo hoo hoo
 
Folks could we please raise the level of debate in this thread. It would be nice to have some substance and discussion of real issues instead of playground stuff and partisan talking points.

Why not actually dissect ideas and policy and discuss the merits or otherwise of them? Political tribalism is boring and a waste of time and energy.

Please offer up something interesting. Thanks.
 
Have we had one trump policy even mentioned on here?

I doubt anyone would know of any successful policies. Its basically been media snippet half truths from Trump hating loons.

He has had some huge successes and big failures. Probably one of the most complex presidential terms from memory.
 
The move to appoint a Supreme Court judge just before an election is another removal of precedent that democracy is built on.

Regarding the language / labelling used here in the thread is really disturbing as its currently the political weapon of choice to label any that any that disagree with extreme accusations creating greater divides in the community.

This is not Australia or an Australian value heaven forbid we get to the extremes currently tearing the US apart all with no moral or ethical leadership.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...