Its a pretty big list. Even if you just start at Hillary.
Its a pretty big list. Even if you just start at Hillary.That is it, that is all you have.
So lets just diagnose your statement, a stack of people who side with the beliefs of the Democrats are all corrupt because of a conspiracy.
The world is f--kd.
Hard to copy and past that article for some reason. Anyway the NY times was caught out lying before. This is the mob that pushed out the conservatives and have since devolved into muckraking.
Did you understand what you read?Mo the media can print what they like but the senate findings have fingered Trump and his enablers acting with Russia to influence the election BTW none of this is new.
If you want to gripe about the FBI try the opening of a case against Clinton and the email fiasco days out from the election then saying we wont take any further action.
RepublicanAfter more than three years of investigation by this Committee, we can now say with no doubt, there was no collusion,” a group of six panel Republicans, including Rubio, wrote in a statement that instead accused the Democratic Party of coordinating with foreign actors to produce Steele’s dossier.
The FBI’s conduct remains under investigation by Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, who was tapped by Barr to explore the origins of the Russia probe.
A former FBI lawyer is expected to plead guilty Wednesday to falsifying a document in the Russia case. Durham is also likely to interview former CIA director John Brennan on Friday, according to a person familiar with the investigation who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Five Democratic senators — including Kamala D. Harris (Calif.), the party’s 2020 vice-presidential nominee — asserted that the report “unambiguously shows that members of the Trump Campaign cooperated with Russian efforts to get Trump elected.” Referring specifically to their findings on Manafort, the Democrats wrote, “This is what collusion looks like.”
Warner, the ranking Democrat on the panel, did not sign onto the Democrats’ dissent but noted “a breathtaking level of contacts between Trump officials and Russian government operatives that is a very real counterintelligence threat to our elections.”
Mo the media can print what they like
The best and most accurate statement made in this matter.
The media do print what they like whether it is true or not.
Most sane people realise that as far as Trump is concerned it is 100% (sorry I exaggerate , it's only 99.99%) lies.
So, the liars, are telling you that Trump is lying.............hmmm.Maybe Dutchie but the media are not in Trumps league when it comes to lies.
Also China completely reneged on the previous deal.Sounds as though the China/U.S trade talks are off for the moment, probably a good idea to wait untill after the election, no point in organising something that may be overturned in a couple of months.
So the liars are telling you that the liars are telling you that Trump is lying. Hmmm.So, the liars, are telling you that Trump is lying.............hmmm.
Did they? it will be interesting to see what happens, at least the China issue has been re enforced with the advent of the virus.Also China completely reneged on the previous deal.
I was involved in a very minor collision in a parking lot in recent months. Didn't take very long to figure out that there were alternative facts involved.How about "alternative facts" ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_facts
Absolutely.So the liars are telling you that the liars are telling you that Trump is lying. Hmmm.
In a strange twist I have been forced to instruct the other party's lawyers on standards of evidence, IOW heresay doesn't count.
I hope you understand the allegory, Komrade.
What I find super interesting is considering the root word being identical, liars and lying having such incongruent spelling
Truth is subjective, as are lies.
True lies?
Absolutely.
So everyone is lying. No argument.
Oh bas!Problem is Wayne "Alternative facts" was brought into the vernacular by Kellyanne Conway when she was trying to defend Sean Spicers demonstrably false statement that Donald Trumps inauguration was the "largest ever inauguration" in US history.
So "alternative facts" stand for defending a provable lie. Provable is the operative word of course.
"Alternative facts" was a phrase used by U.S. Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway during a Meet the Press interview on January 22, 2017, in which she defended White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer's false statement about the attendance numbers of Donald Trump's inauguration as President of the United States. When pressed during the interview with Chuck Todd to explain why Spicer would "utter a provable falsehood", Conway stated that Spicer was giving "alternative facts". Todd responded, "Look, alternative facts are not facts. They're falsehoods."[1]
Well... No.IOW heresay doesn't count.
I beg your pardon... *hearsay*Well... No.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?