- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,649
- Reactions
- 24,553
You have to relax Bas, you will only make yourself unwell. What is the old saying, give me the strengh to change what I can and the serenity to accept what I cant.In a Court of Law Donald Trump would be convicted within a week on the evidence around the charges made against him.
In a Senate 52/100 Republician Senators appear determined to acquit him regardless of what is said just because he is their Republican President and they are in thrall to him. That's politics in the US in 2020. Nothing to do with criminal behavior or evidence.
LMAOIn a Court of Law Donald Trump would be convicted within a week on the evidence around the charges made against him.
.
LMAO
Says our resident ersatz legal expert.
However, Biden, having made a confession on TV for the self same crime, would (should) be in a spot of bother.
In a Court of Law Donald Trump would be convicted within a week on the evidence around the charges made against him.
Really?What evidence?
Ok, run it past us.Really?
Mate, Biden's quid pro quo confession is all over the damned Internet!No he didn't. Where did you get that idea?
Yes, really!Really?
Well look it up or read the thread.Yes, really!
Onya Yoda.The TDS is strong in these ones
It's a weak weak case.Well look it up or read the thread.
Already posted.
Argue your case.
It just gets boring.
Mate, Biden's quid pro quo confession is all over the damned Internet!
Come.
On!
FFS I have to do all the work around here!So you would have no trouble finding it then, but failed to do so. I have been following this issue closely since it began and have never found what you are claiming. Perhaps it is the difference between understanding what is a legitimate action by Biden and an illegitimate action by the president. Do you know the difference?
And you said he confessed to a crime. So why hasn't any action being taken, considering the AG is a puppet of Trump and being able to legally incriminate Biden through the US court system does not entail using unconstitutional activities such as seeking the aid of a foreign government to incriminate your political opponent and would also not raise suspicions of doing Putin's work or involve dealing with shady people like Giuliani and his corrupt associates?
No factual evidence has been posted. Repeating the same old bull**** does not make it a fact. (ask Schiff and Nadler - they could not even make up their minds what to charge him with because there was no evidence!)Well look it up or read the thread.
Already posted.
Argue your case.
It just gets boring.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?