wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,950
- Reactions
- 13,241
You seem to have missed that there is no evidence of that.I'm just astounded at how some people swallow Trump's bullsh*t and completely ignore the underlying principle that he used public money or the threat of withdrawing it to achieve a personal political advantage over a rival.
Anyone who thinks that is OK belongs in a South American dictatorship or a communist People's Party.
So let's say an Australian Prime Minister threatened to withdraw funding to a State government unless they investigated the Leader of the Opposition on any crime of the Prime Ministers choosing.
That would be fine would it ?
I thought using public money to show corruption was the basis of a law following governments, a must do, of course except for democrats when the corrupt is on their sideCome on, using public money to achieve a private advantage ?
That's corruption through and through.
You seem to have missed that there is no evidence of that.
The same planet that demands a quality of evidence, rather than heresay than guessing.Only 5 people with first hand knowledge just testified .... even 3 supplied emails !!
Is 5 enough ? The other 5 involved, Pence ... the VP and energy sec ... Guliani .. Mulvaney and so on refused to appear.
Refusing to appear before the inquiry is called obstruction ... so we have appointed flunkies refusing to appear before the elected officials. Members of the House, elected by the people. Sounds like obstruction looks like and smells like it.
Golly ... what planet are we now on ?
Not on the basis of the evidence presented.Only 5 people with first hand knowledge just testified .... even 3 supplied emails !!
Is 5 enough ? The other 5 involved, Pence ... the VP and energy sec ... Guliani .. Mulvaney and so on refused to appear.
Refusing to appear before the inquiry is called obstruction ... so we have appointed flunkies refusing to appear before the elected officials. Members of the House, elected by the people. Sounds like obstruction looks like and smells like it.
Golly ... what planet are we now on ?
Nothing is evidence ... other than the facts as clearly displayed with backing documents, diaries, emails and time lines.
Where is the scrutiny on the Bidens?
Until it gets to the Senate.Hang on gents you do realise this is a political process not a court room regardless of the terminology being used.
And then it becomes a legal issue and all the senators adjudicate on the facts. As many have a legal background you can be sure a proper decision will be made.Until it gets to the Senate.
Read up on the process.
senators adjudicate on the facts. As many have a legal background you can be sure a proper decision will be made.
President Trump wants it to go to the Senate so justice can quickly occur.
I was being sarcastic
We all know how it is going to go.
Trump authorized any deals
Most of you anti trumps are deranged on any bs you can find. Same as the 50 other times you all got it wrong.No he defied the house and congress ... aid approved ... he BLOCKED it.
That was the deal or blackmail.
Investigate or I will block it.
Are you a cultist ?
Cult of Trump ?
This book may help ...
then again Trump does not read and most followers seem unable to.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?