Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The concern and anger about Donald Trump comes from an exceptionally wide range of people including significant members of the Republician Party.

The concern is about what he does and how he has managed the role of President of US. I thought James Comey summed up the issues very succintly.

“Our president must embody respect and adhere to the values that are at the core of this country,” Comey told Stephanopoulos. “The most important being truth. This president is not able to do that. He is morally unfit to be president.”


Turning first to Trump’s defence of a white supremacists’ march, he said: “A person who sees moral equivalence in Charlottesville, who talks about and treats women like they’re pieces of meat, who lies constantly about matters big and small and insists the American people believe it, that person’s not fit to be president of the United States, on moral grounds.


Something else that become very apparent is that Donald Trump is systematically using his position as President to enrich himself and his family. That is just corruption - pure and simple. Check out how he is doing this day in day out below.

Watchdog group reveals how Trump enriched himself with presidential run
A new report finds the properties have received at least $15.1 million since 2015.
Rebekah Entralgo Apr 16, 2018, 11:08 am

  • SHARE
U.S. businesses has dramatically increased since he announced his run for office in 2015, according to a new report by government watchdog group Public Citizen first obtained by McClatchy.

Watchdog group reveals how Trump enriched himself with presidential run
A new report finds the properties have received at least $15.1 million since 2015.
Rebekah Entralgo Apr 16, 2018, 11:08 am

  • SHARE
Trump International Hotel in Washington D.C. (Photo by Dimitrios Manis/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Political spending at President Donald Trump’s U.S. businesses has dramatically increased since he announced his run for office in 2015, according to a new report by government watchdog group Public Citizen first obtained by McClatchy.

During Trump’s presidential campaign and the first 15 months of his presidency, according to the report, political groups and federal agencies have spent at least $15.1 million at Trump properties. The Trump campaign itself spent the biggest amount — nearly 90 percent, or roughly $13.4 million.
The $15.1 million figure includes more than $717,000 from the Republican National Committee; $595,000 from the RNC and Trump campaign’s joint fundraising committee; and $9,000 from the National Republican Senate Committee.

Two powerful political action committees — American First Action, a PAC dedicated to electing federal candidates who support Trump’s agenda, and Great America Committee, Vice President Mike Pence’s group — spent $33,000 and $24,000 at Trump properties, respectively.






A year into his presidency, Trump is breaking one of his big ethics pledges

The increased spending appears to be a direct result of Trump’s newly found political capital. According to the report, political spending during 2013 and 2014 at Trump properties was just less than $20,000.

And the $15.1 million number may not even represent the full amount of what these political groups have spent at Trump properties or businesses. Groups like Public Citizen and Property of the People have resorted to gathering information through public records requests and Federal Election Commission data because there is no central place to find out just how much the current administration is spending at Trump-owned properties.

The conflict of interest violations involving politics and Trump properties are numerous and far reaching.

The Trump International Hotel in Washington, for example, served as the venue for a fundraiser for Mike Pence’s brother’s congressional race earlier this year.

The Kuwaiti embassy, which had previously hosted its independence day parties at the Four Seasons for 10 years in a row, made the decision to host their 2017 and 2018 receptions at Trump’s D.C. hotel.

In June of 2017, the hotel raked in $270,000 from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during their government officials’ stay at the hotel.

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-pro...litical-groups-federal-agencies-14616126eb04/
 
I agree, especially with the heave bricks bit and that's what we're seeing today. Saw plenty of hate during the Obama era and even more of it here in OZ during the Gillard "Ditch the witch" era, and ironically the vast majority of it coming from the very people who are now playing the victim.

The Cronulla riots were inspired by right wing hate. It's nothing new - just more vitriolic.

Expected polarisation when you consider the rapid trajectory of a vapid society with the insipid at the helm.

When Trump leaves office the path for his successor should be less cluttered with legacy protocols and answer to nobody Mandarins.

The relative decline of USA as empire manifests itself in a feckless force when it comes to military sojourns, a falling life expectancy, a drug addled population that just added even more national apathy through cannabis legalisation, etc ... it's becoming a nation of Eloi watching the Morlocks.

IMO "Doublethink" is the cancer that has rooted itself in Western Culture over the last few decades and Trump represents a threat to that, either as the enemy or as an hijacking Emperor.
 
I reckon that doublethink threat is fading as more backflips and policy changes surface during his tenure. That's the price to pay for placing figureheads at the top of a duopoly of opposing political pyramid schemes :D
 
I reckon that doublethink threat is fading as more backflips and policy changes surface during his tenure. That's the price to pay for placing figureheads at the top of a duopoly of opposing political pyramid schemes :D

The guys writing the Designated Survivor scripts must be like boyz with two dicks everytime Trump picks a fight.
 
The guys writing the Designated Survivor scripts must be like boyz with two dicks everytime Trump picks a fight.
Well that explains their slumped with hands-in-both-pockets posture at press conferences then.

They sure as hell ain't praying for a miracle. LOL
 
The truth slowly ekes out. At yesterday's hearing regarding attorney-client privilege in relation to the material seized during the raid on Cohen's offices and home (Cohen is the Trump lawyer who supposedly paid Stormy Daniels $130K to keep quite about her relationship with Trump), it was revealed that Sean Hannity was one of the other two Cohen clients. For those who watch Fox News, Hannity is for sure the most brazen faced liar on that channel, which (at least the News Division) is full of brazen faced liars.

Trump has on many occasions tweeted about Hannity shows that were about to air and urged followers to tune in. Hannity is a Trump cheerleader and provides a lot of the "opinion pieces" and blatant fake news that Trump tweets about a few hours afterwards. Hannity is one of the foremost attack dogs against Mueller and was also all over Mueller in relation to the raids on Cohen's offices (even though that was not carried out by Mueller, but by one of the local NY FBI divisions). Hannity has never disclosed he had a relationship with Cohen which one might expect prior to his opinion pieces regarding Cohen or Cohen/Trump.

What is interesting now is the difference between what Cohen said was the relationship (Attorney-Client) and what Hannity said it is (casual unpaid conversation regarding some property investment).

More here:

Sean Hannity news is a real problem for Michael Cohen

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/16/...l-problem-for-michael-cohen-coates/index.html

 
Another critical issue facing The Don is the question of of whether Michael Cohen went Prague in 2016 to meet the Russians. This was one of the most specific claims made in the Steele Dossier and was immediately denied by Michael Cohen. But apparently there appears to be evidence showing Cohen was in Prague.

This Vox story goes into much detail on the Steele Dossier and the issues behind the denial that Cohen had ever been to Prague.

Why the question of whether Michael Cohen visited Prague is massively important for Donald Trump
The Steele dossier claimed Cohen went to Prague to meet Russians. He’s said for more than a year that he didn’t.
By Andrew Prokopandrew@vox.com Updated Apr 14, 2018, 12:03pm EDT
Share
Did Trump lawyer Michael Cohen secretly visit Prague to meet with Russians in 2016? The future of Donald Trump’s presidency could hinge on whether the answer to that question is yes.

That’s because the claim that such a meeting happened is one of the most specific claims in Christopher Steele’s dossier alleging collusion between the Trump team and Russia to influence the 2016 election — and because, since the very first day that dossier was publicly released, Cohen has adamantly denied taking any such trip, and Trump’s team has relied on that denial to dispute the dossier’s accuracy. “I have never been to Prague in my life. #fakenews,” Cohen tweeted on January 10, 2017, hours after the dossier was posted.

Yet a new report from McClatchy’s Peter Stone and Greg Gordon claims that special counsel Robert Mueller has evidence that Cohen did, in fact, enter Prague through Germany at the height of the 2016 campaign, in “August or early September.”

The McClatchy report is based on anonymous sources, and we don’t yet know what the purported evidence is. It could still prove to be mistaken. Cohen himself reiterated his denial again Saturday morning, telling CNN, “No, I have never been to Prague,” and sending this tweet rebutting the story:

If the McClatchy report was accurate, it would utterly devastate one of the Trump team’s leading arguments that there was no Trump-Russia collusion. That’s because, to be blunt, there is no reason for Cohen to try to debunk the Steele dossier by lying and saying that he didn’t visit Prague at all if he actually did, unless he was trying to cover up extremely serious wrongdoing that happened during that visit.

https://www.vox.com/2018/4/13/17236660/michael-cohen-prague-trump-steele-dossier
 
Really interesting piece on the law firm that represented Trump on Monday's hearing re attorney-client privilege.

 
Really interesting piece on the law firm that represented Trump on Monday's hearing re attorney-client privilege.



He's almost jumping out of his skin with excitement at the prospect of Trump getting the rounds of the table isn't he. Sets up an atmosphere of frenetic activity, even though the court decides the pace of matters.

If the court decides in favour of Trump, then Trump is not the villain on that occasion and all those casting stones will just have to wait until the next smear campaign.

Who cares if he had some timeout with a prostituting pr0n star. It's not 1950's anymore and sexual proclivities have equality these days.
 
Who cares if he had some timeout with a prostituting pr0n star. It's not 1950's anymore and sexual proclivities have equality these days.

Kennedy got away with his notorious womanising because he was a darling of the Left (or as far Left as you can get in the USA).
 
Kennedy got away with his notorious womanising because he was a darling of the Left (or as far Left as you can get in the USA).


Did you know that an English newspaper got a tipoff ~half an hour before JFK got the bullet? The reporter was tipped to ring the US Embassy for the big news about to occur.
 
Did you know that an English newspaper got a tipoff ~half an hour before JFK got the bullet? The reporter was tipped to ring the US Embassy for the big news about to occur.

I heard a snippet of that.

Do you have any credible links ?
 
I heard a snippet of that.

Do you have any credible links ?


I think it was last year when they release the Kennedy Papers?.

MI5 or MI6 also rec'd a call I think .... probably why we had suspicions about the Ruskies involvement.
 
Really interesting piece on the law firm that represented Trump on Monday's hearing re attorney-client privilege.



Brilliant find Bellenuit. Well worth a view to appreciate the irony of realising that Donald Trump has now hired one of the best criminal law firms in the US - who happen to be leading players in the chorus of disapprovals around the sacking of James Comey. Make sure you get to that section.

As far a Donald Trump having an affair with a pr0n star barely months after Melania gave birth to Barron ? Tawrdy, tasteless and totally Trump. And truth be known no one is surprised. The problem of course is the resolute lying of Donald Trump over the issue and the payoff by Michael Cohen (also resolutely denied) to keep Stormy quiet. It will be these issues the court will be interested in.
 
One aspect of Trump's affairs that should not be overlooked is that apart from what it says about his character, it can also prove to be a huge security issue. The Steel Dossier mentioned the golden showers tapes and if they are real that could be a reason from Trumps reticence on Russia (reluctance to impose sanctions etc). The probability of the Steel Dossier being correct has increased with last weeks revelation that Mueller has proof Cohen was in Prague at the time alleged by Steel, something vehemently denied by Cohen.
 
One aspect of Trump's affairs that should not be overlooked is that apart from what it says about his character, it can also prove to be a huge security issue. The Steel Dossier mentioned the golden showers tapes and if they are real that could be a reason from Trumps reticence on Russia (reluctance to impose sanctions etc). The probability of the Steel Dossier being correct has increased with last weeks revelation that Mueller has proof Cohen was in Prague at the time alleged by Steel, something vehemently denied by Cohen.

The risk that Donald Trump has been compromised by Russia was one of the key concerns of the Steele Dossier. Another point is that if the main elements are proven correct (and it was never suggested that everything was proven) Donald Trump stands exposed as a proven liar over critical national security issues as well as solicting foreign interferance in US elections.

That sounds more than impeachable. Treasonous comes closer to mind.
 
Great interview by Leigh Sales with James Comey. The US lost an impressive public servant when he was sacked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top