tend to agree
i think after the Olympics we should see a big recovery in our resource sector..
lets not forget the chinese steel mills are shut down for the time being
after that our big 3 miners - bhp, rio and fmg can start sending ships over again
Could also easily go the other way around.
Think about how much of our resources have been used to help create all the infrastructure for the games. Once they are over, then what?
The Olympic infrastructure is a drop in the ocean in an economy that is building the equivalent of a city the size of Brisbane every month.....
Beej
Well I disagree.
Infact my analysis is the exact opposite.
Much has been written in the Parent XAO thread.
I agree with most at 4300-4100 as a possible end of this pattern.
But as for the start of a NEW bull market that should last for years.
I tend to agree with those who are saying years--5-7 yrs..
Bugga just noticed I put that in the wrong thread.
Time---I really dont know.
Analysis "timing" isnt my thing.
But some others have offered up some insight.
But as for the start of a NEW bull market that should last for years.
I tend to agree with those who are saying years--5-7 yrs.
Between now and then ranging between 6880 and ---who knows.
Based on what? The stars? You gotta have something to back this up.
where did you learn all that t/a graphing from?
also,
so if you had to consider a long-term view, most of the stocks now look cheap as chips really?
e.g. BHP at 38 , could well b 100 within 5 years?
Now that the olympics develpoment push is now done and dusted, extra demand will have to come from somewhere.
i think after the Olympics we should see a big recovery in our resource sector..
lets not forget the chinese steel mills are shut down for the time being
after that our big 3 miners - bhp, rio and fmg can start sending ships over again
Could also easily go the other way around.
Think about how much of our resources have been used to help create all the infrastructure for the games. Once they are over, then what?
The Olympic infrastructure is a drop in the ocean in an economy that is building the equivalent of a city the size of Brisbane every month.....
To prepare for the Games, Beijing spent about 13 billion yuan ($1.89 billion) to build sports facilities and 280 billion yuan ($40.75 billion) to improve urban infrastructure.
Such investments helped Beijing's economy grow an estimated 10 percent faster in the past seven years, said Yang Kaizhong, president of Beijing Economic and Social Development Research Institute.
But the 293-billion-yuan bill, hefty as it is, only accounted for 0.55 percent to 1.06 percent of China's fixed asset investment between 2005 and 2008, the peak time for Olympic-related investments, Wang said.
And Beijing, the main recipient of Olympics-related investment, only accounts for 3.6 percent of the country's gross domestic product.
But.... what if commodity demand weakens? Even static demand would probably result in price falls in the near/medium term as more supply comes on line.
Now that the olympics develpoment push is now done and dusted, extra demand will have to come from somewhere.
Try as they might, and they do, even the central government struggles to slow this down. It's amazing to witness it happen. I'm picking it to continue to shape the global economy for the next twenty years.
Well I disagree.
Infact my analysis is the exact opposite.
Much has been written in the Parent XAO thread.
I agree with most at 4300-4100 as a possible end of this pattern.
You still need oil to make plastic.
But.... what if commodity demand weakens? Even static demand would probably result in price falls in the near/medium term as more supply comes on line.
Now that the olympics develpoment push is now done and dusted, extra demand will have to come from somewhere.
Yes, of course they have. They are part of a large industry which functions on consumers being in the market. If everyone decided, stuff the market - it's too hard - and put their funds in the bank at 8% instead, well their jobs become a bit shaky.I actually find the Eureka Report authors heavily biased towards buying into the market / the market going up. They must have a vested interest in it.
i
the interest rate's and oil prices was un called for and the jump was to harsh-(lets not lie about that)
we all know this is a good country and we are tough-but yet we seem to follow the silly people-
i mean this credit crunch is related to people who cant pay back or am i wrong here?
what happen to the good old days when u needed a decent % for a house loan- i knew their was going to be problems when u give people 100-110 % $$$?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?