What is racism?

[Tisme]

 

[Tisme]

It's OK ...she's not white skinned nor anglo = double OK

 

[wayneL]

View attachment 86114

It's OK ...she's not white skinned nor anglo = double OK

Those whitefella bastids, absolutely racist for making her feel uncomfortable for being there.

 

[sptrawler]

Kalgoorlie race problems seem to be worsening.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-...s-pelted-with-bricks-and-rocks-on-job/9356698

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-...lia-day-a-symptom-of-a-deeper-problem/9391298

When the penal system, isn't seen as a punishment, you really do have problems.

 

[SirRumpole]

When the penal system, isn't seen as a punishment, you really do have problems.

When people don't have basic decency , then you have a problem.

 

[luutzu]

What's black and doesn't work?



Decaf, you racist.


- from me bro.

 

[Tisme]

For too long white people have had it their own way, science has suffered:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11422-017-9854-9

The hope for multicultural, culturally competent, and diverse perspectives in science education falls short if theoretical considerations of whiteness are not entertained. Since whiteness is characterized as a hegemonic racial dominance that has become so natural it is almost invisible, this paper identifies how whiteness operates in science education such that it falls short of its goal for cultural diversity. Because literature in science education has yet to fully entertain whiteness ideology, this paper offers one of the first theoretical postulations. Drawing from the fields of education, legal studies, and sociology, this paper employs critical whiteness studies as both a theoretical lens and an analytic tool to re-interpret how whiteness might impact science education. Doing so allows the field to reconsider benign, routine, or normative practices and protocol that may influence how future scientists of Color experience the field. In sum, we seek to have the field consider the theoretical frames of whiteness and how it might influence how we engage in science education such that our hope for diversity never fully materializes.

 

[Tisme]

 

[noirua]

Posted for historical reasons only
----

Enoch Powell's @rivers of Blood' speech in 1970:


Rivers of Blood - (Enoch Powell, Birmingham April 20 1968)


Fifty years on, what is the legacy of Enoch Powell’s ‘rivers of blood’ speech?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/14/enoch-powell-rivers-blood-legacy-wolverhampton

Enoch Powell
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/8616174/enoch-powell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch_Powell

Pamela Powell: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-support-sustained-enoch-powell-a8058331.html

 

[Tisme]

Dammed bots!

NOW ROBOTS ARE ‘RACIST’ MOAN SJWS


October 14 2017

Henry Watts

Share
Tweet

Freedom Post

Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) have expanded their war on human nature to include artificial intelligence (AI).

Police forces across Britain are increasingly taking up the use of AI to aid them in carrying out the task of keeping citizens safe, but according to SJWs, the fact that AI machines have noted a disparity between crime levels in different social groups means that robots are now ‘racists’.

Already Thames Valley Police have announced that AI computers could be used to answer 999 calls, detect crimes and identify offenders over the next 10 years.

However, David Green, the director of the Politically Correct Civitas think tank, suggested that AI computers could ‘unfairly’ target ethnic minority groups.

“Robocop policing has now arrived in England,” stated Mr Green.

“This Orwellian reliance on automated decisions has been found to undermine the most basic precepts of the justice system when it has been tried in America.”

One such example alluded to was the employment of PredPol in which the Los Angles Police Department began using an AI algorithm which determined crime hotspots based on police records.

Among other things, this AI algorithm would aid police chiefs in the judicious deployment of officers.

Cue SJW bed-wetting; the crime hotspots turned out to be overwhelmingly in African-American communities.

According to SJWs, this is cast-iron proof that AI is ‘inherently racist’.

Instances such as this prompted an article by columnist Laurie Penny titled ‘Robots are racist and sexist. Just like the people who created them’ published, of course, in The Guardian.

The self-titled ‘progressive’ Liberal left now have a new front to fight in their ceaseless obsession of forcing nature to comply with their pathological ‘utopian’ world view.

There’s only one answer according to The Guardian’s Science Correspondent, Hannah Devlin, AI machines must be programmed to conform to Political Correctness.

Political Correctness is a totalitarian agenda imposed on the people by neo-Marxists to force them to comply with the political left’s warped and un-natural ideology.

The BNP is on the front line in the war to resist the faceless dictatorship of Political Correctness and if AI is our ally in the battle for common sense to prevail: Bring on the ‘bots!

 

[Tisme]

 

[Tisme]

Geting ready for his Whitlam Inst speech, Sothphommasane has a sook,


https://theconversation.com/soutpho...-of-media-exploit-racism-to-make-money-101090

 

[basilio]

Just to let everyone know he isn't a racist.


Trump ally Steve King: I don't know how 'white supremacist' became offensive term

The Republican congressman says the diverse Democratic party appears to be ‘no country for white men’

Tom McCarthy

@TeeMcSee

Email
Fri 11 Jan 2019 06.19 AEDT Last modified on Fri 11 Jan 2019 06.50 AEDT




Steve King attends a rally to highlight crimes committed by undocumented immigrants, in September. Photograph: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call,Inc.
A nine-term Republican congressman and close ally of Donald Trump known for making racially provocative statements said in an interview published Thursday that he did not understand why the phrases “white nationalist” and “white supremacist” had “become offensive”.

Congressman Steve King, who has represented his rural Iowa district in Washington since 2003, made the remarks in an interview with the New York Times.

“White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” King said. “Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?”

In the same interview, King expressed a sense of racial alienation at the swearing-in of the new Democratic majority in the House of Representatives, which includes a record number of women and people of color, as well as the first Muslim American and Native American women elected to Congress.

“You could look over there and think the Democratic party is no country for white men,” King said.

King, who has forged personal alliances with far-right, anti-immigration groups across Europe, has a long track record of making statements widely perceived as racist, although he denies the charge.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/10/steve-king-race-language-white-supremacist-offensive

 

[wayneL]

The Guardian is racist, not qualified to comment.

 

[basilio]

The Guardian is racist, not qualified to comment.

Really Wayne ?

The fact that you are clearly incapable of recognising when a news source reports exactly what a person said and somehow say the news source is racist beggars belief.

Nah Not really.. You'll follow Trump to the ends of the earth, over the cliff and into his top bunk.
Your convinced he is The Great White Hope of Western Civilization.
Touching really. Such devotion..

Republicans slam Rep. King for what they call racist remarks
WASHINGTON — House Republicans on Thursday criticized a fellow GOP lawmaker for making what they said were “racist” comments.
Rep. Steve King of Iowa was quoted in The New York Times saying, “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?”
The comment drew a denunciation from members of House Republican leadership.
Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, the No. 3 Republican, said King’s remarks were “abhorrent and racist and should have no place in our national discourse.”
Another Republican, Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, tweeted, “This is an embrace of racism, and it has no place in Congress or anywhere.”
King later issued a statement saying he is neither a white nationalist nor a white supremacist.
“I reject those labels and the evil ideology that they define. Further, I condemn anyone that supports this evil and bigoted ideology which saw in its ultimate expression the systematic murder of 6 million innocent Jewish lives,” he said. “Under any fair political definition, I am simply a Nationalist.”
Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the No. 2 House Republican, also weighed in.

“It’s offensive to try to legitimize those terms. I think it’s important that he rejected that kind of evil, because that’s what it is, it’s evil ideology,” he said.

In 2014, Scalise apologized after he was found to have addressed a white supremacist group in 2002 founded by former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke. Scalise said he didn’t know of the group’s racial views.
It’s not the first time some Republicans have denounced King, nor the first time King has said his intent is to defend “Western civilization.”

“We can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies,” he tweeted in 2017. Then he doubled down on CNN, telling the network, “I’d like to see an America that’s just so homogeneous that we look a lot the same.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...0cd4f7926f2_story.html?utm_term=.cdfe26c68d0b

 

[wayneL]

Just follow the antiwhite racism on Twitter mate. It is overt, frequent and allowed.

It is unreasonable, unintelligent and monumentally hypocritical.

You clowns are actually creating racism

 

[rederob]

You clowns are actually creating racism

I never knew one could be simultaneously coulrophobic and racist.
Good to know .

 

[wayneL]

I never knew one could be simultaneously coulrophobic and racist.
Good to know .

That might have been clever if it wasn't a non sequitur and a non argument.

 

[rederob]

That might have been clever if it wasn't a non sequitur and a non argument.

It was pointed squarely at you, seeing you appear to be frightened of clowns.

 

[wayneL]

It was pointed squarely at you, seeing you appear to be frightened of clowns.

I love real clowns.

However, you seem to be having trouble with colloquial English idiom (potential tautology notwithstanding ), highlighting the non sequitur.