- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,691
- Reactions
- 7,540
I had a partly defined benefit Govt. Super when I retired. I withdrew the whole lot at full value and transferred it to another account based super scheme because I feared what you said "or promises become unable to meet obligations".The issue is : when many of these schemes (defined benefit especially) or promises become unable to meet obligations (not if).
Defined benefit pension schemes are always problematic and the very reason the future fund was started.The issue is : when many of these schemes (defined benefit especially) or promises become unable to meet obligations (not if).
Then it becomes political; does a government rescind on an obligation, or continue to screw down others to pay for it. And the current situation will turn the screw one more time.
The issue is : when many of these schemes (defined benefit especially) or promises become unable to meet obligations (not if).
Then it becomes political; does a government rescind on an obligation, or continue to screw down others to pay for it. And the current situation will turn the screw one more time.
From memory, I could be wrong, but I thought a lot of U.S companies bailed out of their defined benefit schemes after the GFC and bankruptcy proceedings.Point taken.
I suppose it will depend on the political priorities. Should the Government continue to pay the pensions of parliamentarians or police officers? What about ex judges vs ex nurses?
The other question is the private pension schemes funded by large companies. The GMH's IBMs. Lots pf history here.
It is not as if this question hasn't been posed. It is on the table.
Huge pension fund deficits are a global crisis in waiting
February 16, 2018 11.53pm AED
https://theconversation.com/huge-pension-fund-deficits-are-a-global-crisis-in-waiting-88420
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/jul/08/ibm-shuts-final-salary-scheme
From memory, I could be wrong, but I thought a lot of U.S companies bailed out of their defined benefit schemes after the GFC and bankruptcy proceedings.
It looks like G.M is still funding its obligations, but it sounds like they have a new plan running alongside their pension plan.
https://www.pionline.com/article/20...ion-in-contributions-to-pension-plans-in-2019
Also.
https://www.pionline.com/article/20...-will-retain-most-pension-fund-responsibility
I guess if they can't fund it, they wont, as they say you can't get blood out of a stone.
Free fall general economy is a very dramatic phrase.
Not down playing sentiment which is very negative & so is the stock market, I'll wait to see actual end of quarter figures before drawing such conclusions on the general economy.
In reality the superannuation system hasn't been tested in Australia, it has only been running for a relatively short period of time, therefore not many have retired with big sums.Interesting articles. I gathered from some of the headings that the current corona crisis is creating concern amongst pension fund managers
As equality kicks in, I think we will find those two lines getting closer together.Other than as a Roman soldier, the idea of receiving a pension, especially from the state, is not that old. The Prussian von Bismarck first introduced the concept (and mainly as a tactic to outflank emergent socialists) into the German Chancellory in 1881, for those over the age of 70, reduced to 65 in 1916. The average age for males in Germany was then 63.
And 65 seems to be the age still, sometimes higher and sometimes lower. But as any actuary will tell you, life expectancy has increased dramatically and continues to do so. So, Houston, we have a problem.
View attachment 101136
https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/life-expectancy-death/deaths-in-australia/contents/life-expectancy
Depends if the fund managers saw the fall coming and got out at the peak. In which case they (and we) will be laughing when they buy back in on the lows.
Considering that we have been saying for some time that the market is over valued you would expect fund managers to pick up on that too.
Really ? I would be so surprised to hear of many fund mangers who had significant cash from Mid January. We'll find out of course but every comment I have heard has said that fund mangers stay in the market until it falls over.
Individuals can please themselves. Fund mangers are beholden to the industry.
On a personal note I hope in June, the market is still in turmoil, then some of the term deposit buffer will be deployed into LIC's and ETF'sNot many funds would allow a cash balance of more than 20%, even that would be high
If the PDS says we will invest in the XAO then that is what they Must do.
They can rebalance but they are still fully invested as per the terms of the fund
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?