- Joined
- 30 June 2007
- Posts
- 7,200
- Reactions
- 1,226
Maybe somewhere in between the two. I don't think anyone should feel guilty about wanting a comfortable life. Neither is there any obligation to provide for others.
Neither should there be any implication that to donate to various charities is to avoid feeling guilty about having worked hard and saved in order to ultimately feel secure.
And I don't really think most ordinary individuals would consider they were experiencing 'all the happiness in the world' by living in some slum and serving soup to others. It's quite possible to look after ourselves and at the same time volunteer time and energy to help others.
I loved Taleb's quote. It looks like you and I may be about to turn into a mutual appreciation society!
@Pav, it's not so much about wanting to say "FTSE you" to people, but more about being empowered to enforce personal boundaries.
Having had past experiences of unscrupulous individuals and/or corporate entities inappropriately interfering in my life via the exploitation of their respective positions of power and/or trust, I can definitely appreciate what Taleb's angle might be and therefore relate strongly to it.
Not necessarily. You might be buying at a point which suits you, but from someone who bought at a lower price and has achieved his/her profit objectives. Same with selling. People have different objectives and needs and every decision to buy or sell is voluntary. You are not diddling someone by offering them something which does not exist eg.I guess so, but...
Trading for profit involves taking from others less clever than yourself.
I'm not sure why you see this as any sort of clash in values. Perhaps consider that part of the reason to make money is in order to fulfil one's desire to help others. Think Gates, Twiggy Forrest et al.Charity involves giving to those less fortunate. I saw a clash in values.
For someone who is usually pretty non judgemental, are you sure you're being fair here? There are plenty of people here who just want to make money, and there's nothing wrong with that, but you're singling Pavilion out because of his Christian faith. If he can combine making money with contributing to others, I'm not sure why you're finding a problem with that.And knowing pavillion's strong Christian faith, I would like to know how he reconciles this clash in himself. There''s a Bible quote which says: "Ye cannot serve God and mammon".... but pavillion is giving it a red hot go!
I guess so, but...
Trading for profit involves taking from others less clever than yourself. Charity involves giving to those less fortunate. I saw a clash in values. And knowing pavillion's strong Christian faith, I would like to know how he reconciles this clash in himself. There''s a Bible quote which says: "Ye cannot serve God and mammon".... but pavillion is giving it a red hot go!
Luke 16:13
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and mammon (money)."
Trading for profit involves taking from others less clever than yourself.
That is more making it up than a valid argument or reality.
Firstly, if we are buying a rising price (that is what trading for a profit is all about) then the other side is also selling into a rising price, just too early, so at that point nobody is taking from others. Secondly, trading is part living on your wits and part experience. If I am better at that than the next guy then that is life. Not taking from others at all, just a level playing field in the real world.
If the ultimate aim is to enjoy life and help others enjoy it, do you need to be rich first? Wouldn't the more expedient way be to devote your life right now to helping others and forget about being rich? You don't need money to live in the slums and serve soup as a full time job. All you would need is enough to cover rent and some food. All the happiness in the world is yours, serving others. Or is it about making money for yourself and family to live in luxury and not have to work? And then give some of it to charities so that you don't feel guilty?
It's a huge responsibility to manage other people's money.
We all make mistakes, even after many years, and I'd be sick with worry if I were getting it wrong even slightly with someone else's funds.
Not something that worries you, tinhat?
+ 1
Funnily enough, there's a whole industry of people that do just that and yet somehow manage to elude accountability when things turn pear-shaped!
tinhat, I assume your mother is of pension age.
For some reason GB wants to attack me personally at any opportunity.
I wouldn't worry about that pav, he isn't singling you out, he does it regularly to others as well. My notes have him as naturally negative and not to other debating him on any topic.
Cheers
Country Lad
Your last phrase probably answers the question in the thread title. I agree about this. I'm very happy, however, that the days of needing to take risks are over. I know some people enjoy it. I don't.It is also my observation that most people are excessively risk averse. Yep, I worry but I (and probably many people here) take on more risk than the average person and I expect to achieve a higher pay-off in the long run, which includes living a more comfortable life in the long run.
Yep, all about having control for me.I would imagine that a lot of the older members here have the same motivation - to manage their own SMSF or nest egg so that they keep control over their own money and out-perform managed funds.
Not necessarily too early from their point of view.Firstly, if we are buying a rising price (that is what trading for a profit is all about) then the other side is also selling into a rising price, just too early,
I'm sure most of us have 'mental notes' on our co-forum members.You keep notes on me? That's weird.
My objective is to identify my real objective.
I’ve had plenty of objectives and goals that justified my obsession with the market which have turned out to be self deluding mirages, their importance evaporating as their attainment approached and never turning out to be the real driving force.
Maybe the objective is really to just feed some chemical that arises from the stimulation of taking on the market. Everything else (money, stuff, freedom, helping others, whatever) is just a by-product.
Maybe I’m just unbalanced.
Certainly didn’t have the balance Pav demonstrates in his opening post – for example I burnt every bridge I possibly could when getting into the markets full time. No safety net was/is a reverse objective I guess.
You've done it now CL!I wouldn't worry about that pav, he isn't singling you out, he does it regularly to others as well. My notes have him as naturally negative and not to bother debating him on any topic.
Cheers
Country Lad
Lol why the heck would you want to say that to people? Got a chip on your shoulder?
I want money to have freedom and enjoy life and help others enjoy it too. I've got nothing against anyone else, just want to help as many as I can!
I don't have anything against anyone, i have simply spent my life saying yes sir, no sir, 3 bags full sir...being told what to do usually by idiots and incompetents and people who have mostly found themselves in positions of authority simply because they stayed in the job.
I don't have anything against anyone, i have simply spent my life saying yes sir, no sir, 3 bags full sir...being told what to do usually by idiots and incompetents and people who have mostly found themselves in positions of authority simply because they stayed in the job. **** you money isn't about saying **** you to everyone but being able to say **** you to anyone...having enough money to have the choice....the worst thing in life for ordinary people as far as im concerned is having to sit there and take the crap simply because you cant afford not to.
You've done it now CL!
Now that you've let the cat out of the bag by giving GB his report card, we're all going to want ours too!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?