- Joined
- 12 September 2004
- Posts
- 1,714
- Reactions
- 1
We can argue all sorts of perceived injustices, but legitimate fishing in an area where it is permitted is neither illegal nor could I as a fish-eater condemn it without becoming a hypocrite.Yes, but don't you think it strange that these rich playboys are legally allowed to torture black marlin just for the thrill of it. If they caught crocodiles on hooks just for the thrill of it they would be arrested, and yet I have never heard of a marlin attacking a human.
We can argue all sorts of perceived injustices, but legitimate fishing in an area where it is permitted is neither illegal nor could I as a fish-eater condemn it without becoming a hypocrite.
I'm not sure all the clients are "rich playboys" either, but arguing semantics would derail the thread given I understand the point you are making.
I've eaten Chocodile before as well so I'm not aware of the conditions upon which they are allowed to be caught.
True. And using your logic, some species die out. Evolution works right?
The only argument for a ban on whaling is the cuddly one. Whales are a massive resource. They are a top predator
It is true that if whales are not killed, they will eat more krill, which leaves less for fish, which means there is less fish for us to eat (or we could go more directly and harvest the krill for ourselves to eat, which would probably upset few people).
Yes it does. Before humans were around species died out naturally and others flourished and new species spawned to adapt to a new natural environment.
It is true that if whales are not killed, they will eat more krill, which leaves less for fish, which means there is less fish for us to eat (or we could go more directly and harvest the krill for ourselves to eat, which would probably upset few people).
Surely the logic here should be; Whale numbers are vastly reduced. Fish stocks are vastly reduced. Hence the krill predators are vastly reduced and therefore krill should be more numerous than ever and be able to support, with surplus, both whale and fish populations.
Surely the logic here should be; Whale numbers are vastly reduced. Fish stocks are vastly reduced. Hence the krill predators are vastly reduced and therefore krill should be more numerous than ever and be able to support, with surplus, both whale and fish populations.
So, according to you and others like you, humans are an unnatural species who are somehow remote and removed not only from nature, but from the entire evolutionary cycle?
I don't thnk so.
I'm one of those believers.
Whales aren't considered predators. Don't know where you got that info, unless you just made that up?
Minke Whales are known to eat a wide range of fish species including krill, capeline, herring, sand lance, mackerel, gadoids, cod, saithe and haddock (Haug et al, 1996). Minke Whales are estimated to consume 633,000 tons of Atlantic herring per year in part of Northeast Atlantic (Folkow et al, 1997). In the Barents Sea, it is estimated that a net economic loss of five tons of cod and herring per fishery results from every additional Minke Whale in the population due the fish consumption of the single whale (Schweder, et al, 2000).
Crocodile meat in Australia is farmed. It's a by product of the skin farms. It's my second favourite white meat (cat comes first). Yum!
You actually eat cat? Where do you get this cat meat from? Do you have a pile of flea-collars in your recycling bin, or is there perhaps an Asian cuisine store that has it? We all know what goes into Chinese take out, after all
Honestly, I've never seen cat meat, ever, anywhere!
If that's not a predator, it will do until one comes along.
On average, one humpback eats around 5,000lb of plankton, krill and fish a day.
The meat comes from cats, I believe.
Travel to Vietnam, China or E.Timor.
Its as common there as basket eaters in Balmain.
gg
Are these domesticated animals that go missing, or do they have cat farms? I still can't envision the 'source' for all of these cats!
The Japanese eat fish like you could not believe. IF the fish decline more whales will be eaten. The natural balance is not a given perfect set of conditions.That's flawed logic. There has been a natural balance for millions of years
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?