- Joined
- 6 June 2008
- Posts
- 427
- Reactions
- 0
Equititrust's fate was sealed this month when the company revealed it was unlikely to find an insurer to cover it for professional indemnity, and any possible fraud by its officers, beyond 4pm yesterday. A lack of insurance would have prevented Equititrust from continuing to act as responsible entity for the fund. The company did not return calls yesterday but it is understood its board resigned en masse after the insurance expired.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/asic...equititrust-20111121-1nr04.html#ixzz1ePCGHpF2
While we are doing the court rounds:
In the Federal Court - Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 086 169 422 & Ors v Andrea Jane Waters & Ors
21-Nov-2011 Notice of Acting - Appointment of Lawyer Mark Robert Hodges
15-Nov-2011 Affidavit Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd Acn 086 169 422
15-Nov-2011 Notice of Ceasing to Act Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd Acn 086 169 422
15-Nov-2011 Notice of Ceasing to Act Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd Acn 086 169 422
15-Nov-2011 Notice of Ceasing to Act Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd Acn 086 169 422
15-Nov-2011 Notice of Ceasing to Act Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd Acn 086 169 422
15-Nov-2011 Notice of Ceasing to Act Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd Acn 086 169 422
15-Nov-2011 Notice of Ceasing to Act Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd Acn 086 169 422
Charles, you may know something about this.
And in relation to the PIF AG case:
Wellington Capital Limited ACN 114 248 458 as Responsible Entity of the Premium Income Fund ARSN 090 687 577 v Premium Income Fund Action Group Incorporated (NSW Incorporated Association No. 9894759) & Ors
Application Listed There are no further details on this application.
It is a long story but Class Action members will be informed shortly. There has been a change of Solicitors. Ceasing to act is the formal notification to the Court by HWL Ebsworths. So far as Mark Hodges, Lawyer is concerned this is only a temporary measure and he certainly does not act as a lawyer for the Class Action. He is the trustee of my Super Fund and as such is an applicant in the Class Action proceedings. I assume the Wellington Capital v/c PIFAG relates to costs from previous Court hearings. Regards Charles
I was getting a little worried about how close WC and JH are to HWL Ebsworths - their role at the WC's recent roadshows is of particular concern. Frankly,I think that we could do a lot worse than Mark as our class action solicitor - frankly it would be very reassuring to have a solicitor who is on our side for a change and has some personal commitment to the case.
Whatever the reasons - and they obviously must be sound - let's wish that the process is not prolonged. And, let's remember, IMF is not a free service. If we win, they will charge each of us about 35 per cent.This would be the last straw if Class Action Team were to be infested with Enneagramists.
Cheers,
atlas950 - Well, I think that 35 per cent is 35 per cent. Wherever the sum is derived from, I'm paying if we win. I simply would like IMF to communicate more often. I do share your concerns about the status of the CA. Surely changing solicitors again isn't a good omen for the CA. On the other hand all the preliminaries may now be complete...who knows? The Bentleys delay is also a puzzle.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?