- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 41
- Reactions
- 0
I doubt that would make a difference. Lying is in her dna.
Someone needs to work out a way to ask her about this meeting unde oath.
IT guys are currently reviewing website, links should be working shortly
Makes one want to Vomit, and that Bloody Red Jacket againFor those who have only recently participated in this forum, this 2009 video featuring Ms Hutson may be of interest. For old timers, it's still five minutes of viewing time well spent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H60lzsGvAWQhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H60lzsGvAWQ
I attended the meeting on the 23 June, 2011 and was present when an unofficial vote was called at the request of unit holders present by the Chairman for the purpose of ascertaining whether people wished to vote Wellington Capital OUT. The vote was dec lared UNANIMOUS by the Chair. A vote was called to establish whether unit holders wanted CASCAP as the RE of OUR fund. The vote was also declared UNANIMOUS BY THE CHAIR. Now the question, there was no person in the room at the legitimate meeting voting for Wellington Capital, the meeting was advertised to all unit holders. It is assumed there would be some supporters wanting to retain WC, where were they? They certainly were not warned to be at the meeting held on the second floor above us at 8.30a.m. I did not receive an invitation. Did anyone on this forum receive an invitation? So it seems to me that the only supporters at the 8.30a.m. meeting were the hired hands. Part time actors who had been paid to attend. I have been informed that there were 200 of these persons plus approximately 30 from Victoria who received bus and plane fares to Sydney to vote for Wellington Capital. I am also informed that they were told they would have a good time, all they had to do was vote and then enjoy the hospitality of WC. These people, the hired hands and the Victorians were not unit holders in our fund. Is this bizarre or what?
Makes one want to Vomit, and that Bloody Red Jacket again
Thanks those links are working now.
Not Bizarre CRIMINAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I attended the meeting on the 23 June, 2011 and was present when an unofficial vote was called at the request of unit holders present by the Chairman for the purpose of ascertaining whether people wished to vote Wellington Capital OUT. The vote was dec lared UNANIMOUS by the Chair. A vote was called to establish whether unit holders wanted CASCAP as the RE of OUR fund. The vote was also declared UNANIMOUS BY THE CHAIR. Now the question, there was no person in the room at the legitimate meeting voting for Wellington Capital, the meeting was advertised to all unit holders. It is assumed there would be some supporters wanting to retain WC, where were they? They certainly were not warned to be at the meeting held on the second floor above us at 8.30a.m. I did not receive an invitation. Did anyone on this forum receive an invitation? So it seems to me that the only supporters at the 8.30a.m. meeting were the hired hands. Part time actors who had been paid to attend. I have been informed that there were 200 of these persons plus approximately 30 from Victoria who received bus and plane fares to Sydney to vote for Wellington Capital. I am also informed that they were told they would have a good time, all they had to do was vote and then enjoy the hospitality of WC. These people, the hired hands and the Victorians were not unit holders in our fund. Is this bizarre or what?
Surely this illegal activity has been noted by ASIC? Why havnt they sprung into action & condemed it!!! Towbar
I attended the meeting on the 23 June, 2011 and was present when an unofficial vote was called at the request of unit holders present by the Chairman for the purpose of ascertaining whether people wished to vote Wellington Capital OUT. The vote was dec lared UNANIMOUS by the Chair. A vote was called to establish whether unit holders wanted CASCAP as the RE of OUR fund. The vote was also declared UNANIMOUS BY THE CHAIR. Now the question, there was no person in the room at the legitimate meeting voting for Wellington Capital, the meeting was advertised to all unit holders. It is assumed there would be some supporters wanting to retain WC, where were they? They certainly were not warned to be at the meeting held on the second floor above us at 8.30a.m. I did not receive an invitation. Did anyone on this forum receive an invitation? So it seems to me that the only supporters at the 8.30a.m. meeting were the hired hands. Part time actors who had been paid to attend. I have been informed that there were 200 of these persons plus approximately 30 from Victoria who received bus and plane fares to Sydney to vote for Wellington Capital. I am also informed that they were told they would have a good time, all they had to do was vote and then enjoy the hospitality of WC. These people, the hired hands and the Victorians were not unit holders in our fund. Is this bizarre or what?
I would just like to say I admire you all - I have been involved in property funds management for a long time and what is going here is both a sad inditement of what occurred during the boom times as well as the looters that fall out after. What we see here may be a looter at their best - bold as brass to start with and then suddenly nowhere to be seen other than attempting to save their own skin. I have been in this space for nearly a quarter of a century, and like most on the post have never seen anything quite like this. My belief is that you'll beat her - you'd have to but EVERYONE MUST VOTE. My question is though - WHERE THE HELL IS ASIC? Your patience, and tenacity is amazing. Great story today in the SMH - most I spoke to cannot believe it!
To see what it is all about under oath, have a look at the sworn affidavits - The Federal Court in Brisbane will hear this application brought by Wellington Capital Limited on Wednesday, 6 July 2011. To review a summary of the affidavit material and submissions filed in relation to the PIF Action Group http://cascap.com.au/page.php?page=36Someone needs to work out a way to ask her about this meeting unde oath.
I have neem extremely busy and I may have missed Wellington Capital reverting the Constiution to former status after it had been fiddled with to meld WC justification for placement of units and the so called rights issue. Has the constitution been altered? Can one of you kind persons look this up and if it has not been amended could you please pay the courtesy to WC and give them one of you gentle reminders, please. If it is already done I offer my sincere apologies to WC??????
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?