- Joined
- 6 June 2008
- Posts
- 427
- Reactions
- 0
"Yesterday the Australian Securities and Investments Commission informed the PIF Action Group that it would not take any action."
This proves THERE IS NO CORPORATE REGULATION IN AUSTRALIA!
elizaman I believe CasCaP (CastlereaghCapital) intend to hold 4 information sessions prior to the EGM. Locations Melb, Syd, Pt Maquarie and Brisbane, dates and venues to be confirmed on the CasCap website soon. http://www.cascap.com.au./Thanks. And a great job at that for those of us that have not been able to keep up to date or even know where to look for that matter. Wiser is great also. Comes with making mistakes half the time and learning from them. Castlereagh needs to ouline their plan just a little more in detail though so we can all decide on either the devil we know or the devil we don't know. Based on the recent post from seamistry the change can't come fast enough , but also what would prevent Castlereagh from doing the same thing??. Would there be a new constitution written to avoid this blantant abuse of power with the share issue's and it's subsequent diltuion of our own units??
"Yesterday the Australian Securities and Investments Commission informed the PIF Action Group that it would not take any action."
This proves THERE IS NO CORPORATE REGULATION IN AUSTRALIA!
Marcom -"For one I think the main priority is to get rid if JH even if it costs $5m (maybe this could be negotiated down - after all JH's so-called reputation would be irreparably damaged after being thrown out as RE) it is a small amount compared to what JH has already lost us." reasonable
"People we got it wrong installing Wellington let get it right this time WE CAN NOT BE ANY WORSE OF THAN WE ARE LETS GET RID OF WELLINGTON NOW IF WE HAVE TO PAY A PENALTY PAY BUT GET RID OF THEM" Waterloo
IF we have to pay to get rid of WC, we can later sue them for damages for incompetence, fraud, misappropriation or what ever a forensic accounting examination of fund accounts may reveal. We stand to get a lot more than $5m back I bet!
Marcom -
Your expressed feelings are spot on. A few million to get rid of WC would be worth it. Frankly, I can't imagine suffering another year of this charade.
I sent an angry letter to our "guardians" at ASIC this afternoon. What a pathetic organisation.
JohnH, I am sure that is on record somewhere, Wellington Capital will not only be fighting for control of the PIF, but their reputation as a 'boutique merchant bank and fund manager experienced in providing dynamic advice and services' is also in tatters!! Jenny Hutson as CEO of G8 Education is fighting for their reputation re Cherie Hearts aquisition which is also in question and involved in a complex legal investigation!! The ****e has hit:fan. Let the games begin, an average unprivelledged person versus the the uni student who 'spent far too much time testing the boundaries of excess to excell academically, but did well enough to be offered a job at McCullough Robertsons'. HA HA, I excelled academically and left school at 14, not 22, tested the boundaries and retired at 38 on my own merit. MFS/OCV and Wellington Capital have a lot to answer for, don't even begin to think you can intimmidate me, you have much more important issues to deal with. Seamisty........... I've raised this before, but nobody seemed to pick it up. The best part of a thousand of us on the Gold Coast heard JH state that if she had not performed, then she would not draw the 2%. Has anybody got a recording/video of that statement??
Has it occured that this may be a plan to increase voting rights by someone else close to WC's mandate?? It says there is no minimum price required, based on the recent issue at 10cents 7.5 mil still sold. Now there at 09 cents this so called "sophisticated investor" could be looking to align there units with someone else. PIF AG says it has control of 27 % I think I read somewhere.??? That still leaves 73% out there somewhere and with dilution at this rate it doesn't take long to swallow up a majority of units for voting purposes possibly. It's also happening very quickly and so soon after the 10 cent issue. seems odd.
I have read your posts with interest, there are no guarantees in life as you are well aware. The PIFAG have worked very hard to reach the stage that we are now at and it is up to those who support the change to help in anyway they can. All constructive comments are welcome. You have mentioned the figure 27% of votes. That is not correct. The PIFAG membership represents approximately 27% of all unit holders and is rising every day. The PIFAG is self funded and does not seek contributions. It has been all voluntary. The 27% of unit holders have control of at least 37% of units on issue. It is also of interest Elizaman to note that a huge proportion of unit holders have joined the class action and as such they control an equally huge amount of units on issue. I am sure each and every unit holder is aware that the PIFAG were instrumnental in the formation of the class action and all the necessary work required to get lawyers, litigation funding etc together. It cannot be said that the PIFAG have not been patient with the present RE and the sudden spurt of inspiration by the management of the fund is not fooling anyone. From the information I have received from countless unit holders are that they are waiting at the their post boxes with their pens poised to write. WC can try all their tricks and dilute the fund but I can assure WC that unit holders have had enough and will be glad to see change.
Let me say this, it has been said that we are all wiser since we attended the pantomime shows in 2008. Castlereagh Capital's performance will be closely monitored, this I believe. There is one thing we can be sure, WC will try every known and unknown way to survive. If unit holders think she should they will vote according to their wishes, on the other hand if they don't they will vote for change. One thing for sure is every unit holder should vote.
elizaman I believe CasCaP (CastlereaghCapital) intend to hold 4 information sessions prior to the EGM. Locations Melb, Syd, Pt Maquarie and Brisbane, dates and venues to be confirmed on the CasCap website soon. http://www.cascap.com.au./
I strongly suspect the reason why WC did the capital raising exercise was to shore up some voting support for themselves, hence the 'fresh blood' from outside of the Fund from investors whose identity still remains a mystery. Also WC has some fiercely expensive operating costs which the PIF contributes heavily towards and there has been slim pickings of late. The whole sordid exercise has backfired on Wellington Capital. Seamisty
JohnH I was waiting for the froth that came with the announcement to dry before I posted it!! We expected WC to come out swinging (a handbag?) I guess they have nothing left but to scaremonger, obviously their tactics to try and align the PIFAG with ALFPIF failed, yes thats right, Jenny Hutson was quoted as saying "I have had investors speak to me today indicating that they've been contacted by ALF PIF recently and have been told that ALF PIF has arranged for Bri Ferrier to be licensed and that they're working together to take over the fund."http://www.nsxa.com.au/ftp/news/021724031.PDF
trading ban now lifted and part of WC's statement
Jenny Hutson Managing Director said:
‘The meeting material received does not in the opinion of our lawyers, satisfy the requirements of the
Corporations Act and the constitution of the Fund.
Separately, the resolutions proposing to appoint a replacement responsible entity that does not currently
hold an Australian Financial Services Licence, of a kind, that would enable it to be the responsible entity,
raises serious legal issues as to the validity of that proposed resolution.
It also raises practical issues in that the resolution as proposed could result in the Premium Income Fund
being wound up.
In addition, the proposal consequently puts at risk the $31.25 million in contracts signed but not yet settled.’
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?