- Joined
- 6 December 2009
- Posts
- 64
- Reactions
- 0
Fortunately we have, Bentleys, IMF and Carney lawyers on the case as well, between them all ( and I do not include our illustrious leader and her token gestures costing PIF investors millions in fees to the likes of McCoughupRobertsons for legal representation!!) we should at least have access to all the facts pertinent to the case. At least ASIC has revealed the extent of the alledged fraud surrounding falsified documents etc relating to the missappropriation of PIF money. Two last quotes from Teddy for the year!!!Merry Xmas and happy new year to all...
I guess you'll all be disappointed with ASIC's latest blunder:-
"... BRENDAN TREMBATH: But first, the corporate watchdog has suffered yet another humiliating legal defeat. The Federal Court today dismissed legal action by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission against the mining magnate Andrew Forrest and his company, Fortescue Metals.
Justice John Gilmour was highly critical of ASIC's conduct. He found there was no basis for its claim Andrew Forrest and Fortescue knowingly issued misleading statements to the Stock Exchange. And he attacked ASIC for making public allegations of deliberate dishonesty against Mr Forrest and his fellow board members without foundation. ..."
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2009/s2779648.htm
If ASIC has so much trouble getting the facts right - what chances have we got in our respective funds?
I'd guess they wouldn't have much time to bother about our funds with all the mess they seem to be making in the courts.
Reputations are worth nothing if you do not live up to them, whether they are earnt or self professed in my opinion. What matters are results based on promises and projections from supposedly qualified experts and if they are not forthcoming then reputations can be reassessed and judged accordingly to performance. From a PIF investors point of view WC has delivered nothing but empty promises and to add insult to injury it appears investors are being punished by Wellington Capital by way of lack of communication!! It is not our fault you did not live up to investor expectations and you failed to deliver. Obviously it is even too much to expect a four monthly update on time ( rather than the original three monthly one promised.) When does the IAG meet and report back to investors? What a joke!!! Yep, sure I am cynical, but just expressing my opinion as I see it, Seamisty://www.wellcap.com.au/articles/About%20Wellington.pdfWellington Capital has a reputation for high standards of client service, innovation and devising successful“In the end, you make your reputation and you have your success based upon credibility and being able to provide people who are really hungry for information what they want.” (Britt Hulme, US journalist.)
Is anybody listening in a certain boardoom?
Reputations are worth nothing if you do not live up to them, whether they are earnt or self professed in my opinion. What matters are results based on promises and projections from supposedly qualified experts and if they are not forthcoming then reputations can be reassessed and judged accordingly to performance. From a PIF investors point of view WC has delivered nothing but empty promises and to add insult to injury it appears investors are being punished by Wellington Capital by way of lack of communication!! It is not our fault you did not live up to investor expectations and you failed to deliver. Obviously it is even too much to expect a four monthly update on time ( rather than the original three monthly one promised.) When does the IAG meet and report back to investors? What a joke!!! Yep, sure I am cynical, but just expressing my opinion as I see it, Seamisty://www.wellcap.com.au/articles/About%20Wellington.pdfWellington Capital has a reputation for high standards of client service, innovation and devising successful
commercial solutions to complex issues.
Our growth has been fuelled by strong, long standing relationships which have been built on trust, a commitment
to delivering commercial advice and focusing on helping clients and investors achieve their long term corporate
and growth aspirations.
Anyone have a copy of the PIF PDS dated 13 December 2006? Can you scan and post the section on Fees and Costs.
May be able to help there duped.
Have 3 PDS, last one sent to me by Mr. Zielinsky in 2008.
It is NOT identified as 13 Dec 06, but page 2 has:
"The size of the Fund at 31 October 2006 was $755,870,765."
so it may be assumed as PDS for the date you require. It has 5 pages on Fees & Costs.
I am unable to scan (HELP utility did not help), but will make copies and mail them out to you.
Let me know.
Regards, simgrund
I spoke with Breaker last night Owls regarding the email from Carneys. PIF AG will try and get some clarifications/interpretations today from Carneys and IMF which hopefully will be easier to understand. Alternatively investors could contact the Investor Advisory Committee members to discuss this current issue, Mr Mangan, Ms Woodford or Ms Andrejic at iac@newpif.com.au The answers could be included in the overdue Dec 2009 PIF Investor update or.........maybe not!!! Cheers, SeamistyGood morning. I have just received and read the email from Carneys re the class action being organised by IMF. I would appreciate it if someone more informed in these matters could please explain in simple language what it means to the class action.. Is it to our advantage what happened with Multiplex or not. Is it still full steam ahead on the class action with IMF still funding the whole thing. I apprecaite any advice. Enjoy the day ahead.
I found the Carneys email quite complex to interpret. However, the link they give to ASIC is useful as ASIC explain the situation in simpler terms.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?