- Joined
- 22 May 2008
- Posts
- 758
- Reactions
- 0
NSX update. Offer to sell recorded: 100,000 at 13c. Ouch!!!!!!
434,822 units sold for 12c
Don't forget. On Monday if thou art a pensioner get thee down to Centrelink and get thy Wellington PIF holding value adjusted to gain a few more of Mr Swan's shekels.
I'd like to know who bought those shares
Lol Ian, but we will have to get back on topic or risk a drubbing. It is a major concern to me and others that the outstanding bank loan of $9.5 mill has only been reduced by $1.4mill in the past month and the loan has now been extended. This is a very real indication of how much income the PIF is not receiving and deserves a far more detailed update to unit holders from WC as to the current financial position of the fund and what we can expect in regard to future distributions and asset values in the interim. The majority of us recognise the fact that we are experiencing extreme financial conditions that were not factored into WC's predictions and forecasts in regard to anticipated future returns and expectations originally of the PIF. However, the reality is that we need answers and expect that WC has a plan in place to deal with this current crisis and as unit holders, we deserve to be fully informed of the intentions of the RE as to how it intends to deal with this situation. SeamistyI was at my bank today. There was a short line. Just one lady in front of me . An Asian lady who was trying to exchange yen for dollars. It was obvious she was a little irritated . . . She asked the teller, "Why it change? Yesterday, I get two hunat dolla fo yen. Today I only get hunat eighty? Why it change?" The teller shrugged his shoulders and said, "Fluctuations." The Asian lady says, "Fluc you white people, too!"
The last trades that totalled approx 494,00 were indicative to me Jadel of coming from one holder. I could be wrong but it looked to me that someone just wanted out, hence the last four being taken out in one hit of 12 cents. If this is the case, I don't think this can be interpreted as 'panic' selling on a large scale. The buyer is probablly an astute investor that can recognise the long term potential of buying into a fund that has potential upside long term, and no, it was not me. SeamistyLikewise Demodocus
I also feel truely sorry for the poor desperate souls that were forced to sell them
Wonder if JH has any problems sleeping at night ?
The last trades that totalled approx 494,00 were indicative to me Jadel of coming from one holder. I could be wrong but it looked to me that someone just wanted out, hence the last four being taken out in one hit of 12 cents. If this is the case, I don't think this can be interpreted as 'panic' selling on a large scale. The buyer is probablly an astute investor that can recognise the long term potential of buying into a fund that has potential upside long term, and no, it was not me. Seamisty
The last trades that totalled approx 494,00 were indicative to me Jadel of coming from one holder. I could be wrong but it looked to me that someone just wanted out, hence the last four being taken out in one hit of 12 cents. If this is the case, I don't think this can be interpreted as 'panic' selling on a large scale. The buyer is probablly an astute investor that can recognise the long term potential of buying into a fund that has potential upside long term, and no, it was not me. Seamisty
Jadel do you also tag family members and friends 'vultures' when they go bargain hunting during retail sales where items are discounted to generate cash flow or to divest themselves of stock they can't afford to keep in their stores when times are tough? No one is disputing the fact that it is heartbreaking for investors who are forced to quit their units because of personal circumstances at these prices. Should people be called 'vultures' or greedy when they invest in products that offer a higher rate of return and risk than more conservative secure products offered by banks? Should every person that buys shares in companies that are trading well below current market value attributed to the current global financial be called 'vultures', or will we just save that name for people investing in the PIF? SeamistyYes John,
The Vultures are hovering and have just had a tremendous feast . It is really irrelevant whether or not it is on one carcass or many.
What I, (and probably Demodocus are both wondering) is ,if these particular birds are related in any way shape or form to WC.
Jadel do you also tag family members and friends 'vultures' when they go bargain hunting during retail sales where items are discounted to generate cash flow or to divest themselves of stock they can't afford to keep in their stores when times are tough? No one is disputing the fact that it is heartbreaking for investors who are forced to quit their units because of personal circumstances at these prices. Should people be called 'vultures' or greedy when they invest in products that offer a higher rate of return and risk than more conservative secure products offered by banks? Should every person that buys shares in companies that are trading well below current market value attributed to the current global financial be called 'vultures', or will we just save that name for people investing in the PIF? Seamisty
JohnH, can I have a loan of that whip please? I hope the PIF will have the funds to go ahead with the buyback as was promised as I know many investors are sweating on that. Does anyone know which specific projects linked to Raptis owe money to the PIF. I think there are 5-6 companies involved in Raptis developments that are now in the hands of receivers. Not looking good. SeamistyWhoops - looks like I have had my wrist slapped! :whip I did put it in inverted commas - maybe "opportunists" would be more euphemistic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?