- Joined
- 10 October 2008
- Posts
- 63
- Reactions
- 0
This is a long process, it has just started. What are you monitoring? Too early to guage performance. JH has stated one couple have taken up 70 hours of WC time. Sound familiar Cable Guy? That at this stage is pestering rather than 'monitoring'? Some groups have been a costly hinderance rather than a beneficial action group to the fund, and these individuals would not really be treated seriously or respected and definitely should not tout themselves as an action group representing the views and interests of the majority of the unitholders.
SNIP...If WC did everything the way you wanted it done, you would not have a problem with the RE. Unfortunately things don't work that way...SNIP
Simgrund
The PIFI have been spending many hours of dedicated research and effort into this matter
We are fortunate to have some very talented people who have been prepared to make this effort entirely at their own cost and time .
All PIFI members and supporters well be receiving details shortly
I think the best approach with ASIC is for every investor to take on the responsibility of keeping the pressure on ASIC.
If you have a compliant you can continue to add more information via email as it becomes available.
Just some straight talk and honest answers is all I am looking for.
Are you a unit holder Burnt and can you verify that Phillip Higson is NOT a unit holder? Seamisty
Even if Philip Higson is not a unit holder and was representing others who were, paid for his effort or otherwise, I personally don't see much difference than if some investors choose to pay lawyers for example, or call on ASIC to intervene to represent them, or see fit to do mailouts lobbying for support. So what? It is all past history now, what is relevent is what is ahead of unitholders and the ability of WC to stabilise our Fund. Seamisty:Interesting job ad placed by Philip Higson on 15th Sept :-
http://www.ployme.com.au/SearchEmployers.aspx?ind=40&dis=50&nod=1&pg=3
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/g-KMP58?OpenDocument
More mortgage funds freeze redemptions
Published 5:17 AM, 22 Oct 2008
Investment and Financial Association chief executive Richard Gilbert told the paper that the group is going to meet with treasury officials in Canberra to lobby for the government to provide support to "reassure investors."
Here's an interview with Richard Gilbert on the ABC yesterday.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/2008/10/21/2397038.htm
Even if Philip Higson is not a unit holder and was representing others who were, paid for his effort or otherwise, I personally don't see much difference than if some investors choose to pay lawyers for example, or call on ASIC to intervene to represent them, or see fit to do mailouts lobbying for support. So what? It is all past history now, what is relevent is what is ahead of unitholders and the ability of WC to stabilise our Fund. Seamisty:
Interesting job ad placed by Philip Higson on 15th Sept :-
http://www.ployme.com.au/SearchEmployers.aspx?ind=40&dis=50&nod=1&pg=3
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?