so very quiet
flying under the radar
one announcement due soon will change all that
for those that follow and invest in Uranium well worth a look as this will be the next ASX listed Uranium producer
Good company, enigmatic;Still no real interest in this New Uranium producer. has climbed to 20cents now and with Uranium exploding up to $US73/lb now no wonder its growing in price.
I have a feeling this one will only really start to shine once Profit figures come in and everyone realizes how low there P/E is.
Anyway keen watcher of this Uranium producer.
DYOR
I follow, yes I'd say denison will be getting a good deal. Its bid is 4c higher than the price when the corresponding trading halt occurred, so I'm guessing the move up to 23c after the announcement is simply the market matching the anticipated future buy price.Not sure if anyone else follows this but looks like dension has made a cash bid at 24cents
which is 1cent higher then its current value.
I tend to think WCU is value is far greater then this due to there land holding in Utah and the simple fact they are the only company that has been given mining rights in this region for 30years.
Doesn't seem fair value so i can only assume the board is getting something from the deal
Is it possible that the bidder fails to secure enough acceptances? Seeing that Denison keep mailing letters and extending the deadline, that seems increasingly possible.Interesting, to say the least, is the sweetener that was given to Ms Lulu Yu.
For her $2.5M "Convertible Note" she now received 23M new shares before the deal.
You do the maths. I reckon the entire deal stinks and ought to be rejected.
Is it possible that the bidder fails to secure enough acceptances? Seeing that Denison keep mailing letters and extending the deadline, that seems increasingly possible.
Does anybody know where the threshold to compulsory acquisition lies? I understand that, once 90% of votes have agreed to sell, the last tenth will still receive the same consideration as everybody that accepted within the time period, except that they're forced to sell, whether they want to or not. That would mean, NOT accepting the offer won't disadvantage a holder.
And what would happen if they did NOT receive the required 90%? Will all acceptances be wound back? Or does the bidder simply end up with 70 or 80% of the stock without achieving full control?
I've googled "how does a takeover bid failing affect acceptances?", but couldn't get a helpful answer.
Thanks for that;If 90% acceptance was the condition I believe the bidder can walk away, as one of the conditions is defeated. So all the acceptances are "wound back" as you put it.
Other scenarios include the bidder lowers the threshold to say 75%, and they hold what they have and may be come back with a mop up bid down the track. Or they can throw in a sweetener in hope of getting that final 15%...
In the uranium space it wouldn't surprise me if the bidder's gone cold feet. But I haven't followed WCU in detail so pure random speculation only.
Thanks for that;
I did buy some at the recent dip, feeling I'm practically guaranteed 24c. But hoping for more - who wouldn't
WHat about the Japan quake? WCU is on the other side of the Earth. Sure, there was a knee-jerk reaction, but those are an opportunity more often than a risk.Recent dip? If you bought some during the Japan earthquake then you are a brave man...:cowboy:
WHat about the Japan quake? WCU is on the other side of the Earth. Sure, there was a knee-jerk reaction, but those are an opportunity more often than a risk.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.