This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Very nice Rain here today

Jump to new
farmerge said:
I seem to remember that when Ernie as talking piping the water from the North-West, it was on a downward slope with limited pumping stations involved.
Click to expand...
I've never had anything to do with these ideas specifically but the general principle applied to most water pumping schemes is to use gravity for as much of the horizontal distance as possible, containing the pumping to a smallish area near the source.

Plenty of examples of that eg the Shoalhaven scheme (part of Sydney's water supply) as per following diagram. Water is 130km from Sydney (measured in a straight line) where it enters the scheme (bottom left of the diagram) and it's still 100km from Sydney where it leaves the scheme at the top right. So the scheme only moves it 30km horizontally but it does raise its elevation by 621.2m vertically and that's the key to making it work. Gravity and natural river channels then takes it the rest of the way - and those cost absolutely nothing.

Same basic principle for most bulk water movement schemes.

 
Also would be good to settle the ash that we have here at the farm from the fire from last Monday. Nothing worse that stinking acrid ash smell.
 
IFocus said:
Haven't we debunked this before?

Isn't energy to pump water 1000's of Kms is way higher than decel?

As for irrigation surely there is still room in the Kimberly's for further expansion?
Click to expand...
As I said in the last post on this subject , times change, priorities change and technologies change.

If the pipeline had been built and the gas pumping had been used, now 20 years later we would probably be changing the gas pumping equipment for solar supplied electrical pumps and the cost would be minimised.

Times change and technology changes, but people's lack of vision doesn't and opportunity is lost.

Maybe the whole of the West coast would now be irrigated, with renewable energy and agriculture down the West coast would be flurishing, who knows.

Meanwhile we put in desal plants, the first one the smallest is 80MW, I think the second Binningup is double that and I have no idea as to the size of the Alkimos one, but you can bet it is bigger again.

That is a lot of pumping power, but our politics just thrive on destroying opposition ideas, even if it is to the detriment of the countries future.

A fly in fly out future isn't sustainable, we need to develop the North, despite Sydney/Melbourne focused politicians, who seem to be more concerned about their futures than those they are supposed to be representing and that isn't party specific.
 
Last edited:
sptrawler said:
...but our politics just thrive on destroying opposition ideas, even if it is to the detriment of the countries future.
Click to expand...
This is the most distressing thing. In this regard, Australia has lost a multitude of truly gargantuan opportunities, from finance, technology, manufacturing etc

It shows up in our world ranking in the complexity of economies (95 or 98 IIRC) which, all things considered is absolutely abysmal and unforgivable.
 
Tribal politics and pissing rights, overides Australia's future every time. Lol
 
wayneL said:
This is the most distressing thing. In this regard, Australia has lost a multitude of truly gargantuan opportunities, from finance, technology, manufacturing etc
Click to expand...
The Shoalhaven Scheme I posted the diagram for has never been finished by the way.

The original design was done in the 1960's and it was decided at the time to build it to a level adequate for the medium term needs of Sydney with completion in 1977.

The present scheme has a small dam on the river, and two sets of pumps for each of the three stages of pumping. This was the minimum to be reliable, so no single pump failure would take the whole thing out, but results in a mis-match of flow rates between the stages.

To be equal the second stage needs 4 pumps, installation of which was always planned as a second stage project along with building another dam upstream. So more water to pump, and more ability to pump it. It would approximately double Sydney's total water storage capacity.

In the year 2000 government permanently scrapped the second stage.....
 
Last edited:
As SA was mentioned, this may be relevant.

Without its desalination plant, SA would probably have water restrictions again

South Australia's reservoirs are back to the low levels of the Millennium Drought era. But most of us aren't facing water restrictions this time around, largely because the state has something it didn't have back then – a desalination plant.
www.abc.net.au

"It's better to have a desal plant and not use it, rather than to need it and not have it."

The same applies to a lot of things, like energy storage perhaps?
 
@Smurf1976 Don't you just love Governments that have little to no forward thinking.
Appears the planning is there but nothing after that of any consequence.
 
It seems to be settling. Flood warnings have moderated. I will venture out for a few appointments today none of which will be affected by road closures of which there are many.

You wait so long for the rain and then it all comes at once. Such is life.

gg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Real Life vs. Perception
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
notting
How to make money on the w/end
Replies
0
Views
3K
Glen48
Shortening the trading time frame
Replies
14
Views
7K
Gringotts Bank
Why "Technical Analysis"? A Cat's Eye View
Replies
14
Views
7K
pixel
G
Some scary stuff happened to me today
Replies
12
Views
4K
Glen48
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...