Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Uranium, a Raging Bull

A possible explanation for the U crazy runs of certain stocks like NTU UNX



Overheated uranium plays spark warnings
27th December 2006, 9:45 WST

Analysts have warned investors about the risks of getting caught up in the hype surrounding uranium amid expectations that the radioactive metal will continue a blistering market run next year.

Brokers and analysts fear that investors face big losses by blindly jumping on to junior uranium plays that are going to the market with untested uranium sampling results and enjoying over-inflated market valuations.

A steady diet of trace uranium discoveries, record yellowcake prices and anticipated supply constraints has bulked up the market valuations of most uranium juniors to a hefty premium to their underlying net assets, with many uranium juniors packing on an average of 143 per cent in the past 12 months.

Far East Capital analyst Warwick Grigor believes investors are overreacting to uranium sampling results that do not warrant the enthusiasm and in some cases are misleading.

In his December uranium sector analysis report, Mr Grigor warned: "In most cases it is the trace of uranium that is exciting punters, and companies are reporting these traces as if they amount to a discovery.

"This is very misleading. Most of these companies will find that uranium has simply passed on by and the excitement has been premature."

Mr Grigor said it was not good enough for companies to just have a radiometric anomaly covering a paleochannel, companies needed to find out where the transport had stopped and if a deposition has taken place.

Few grassroot explorers with tenements in WA managed to rate above average in Mr Grigor’s sector poll, with Aura Energy, Aurora Minerals, Encounter Resources, Korab Resources, Scimitar Resources and U3O8 just scraping in with a fair rating.

Northern Uranium and Thundelarra Exploration were among the handful of junior explorers described as possessing good quality assets.

Daiwa Securities analyst Mark Pervan said 95 per cent of listed uranium juniors would never see the light of day from a production point of view because they were too small, did not have mining permits and the regulatory environment was too restrictive.

Analysts have warned that many investors were overly excited about uranium and not recognising there were long lead times involved in getting uranium production up and running, resulting in the stocks being priced as if mining and production were already occurring.

Over the past six months the uranium price has climbed 64 per cent, driven primarily by the anticipated energy appetite from the proposed construction of 178 new nuclear reactors, which represents a 40 per cent increase on current global nuclear infrastructure.

Last week the spot uranium price soared $US6.50 a pound to a new high of $US72/lb, marking the single biggest increase since price publishing began in 1968.

Resource Capital Research analyst John Wilson said that companies with advanced projects, such as Uranex, PepinNini Minerals, Berkeley Resources, Wildhorse Energy and Energy Metals were most likely to make rapid gains next year.

Mr Wilson forecasts the uranium price to be $US90/lb by mid 2007 and $US115/lb by September 2008.

Hartleys resources analyst Andrew Muir said most uranium juniors were years away from gaining any upside from higher uranium prices.

TRACEY COOK
 
Looks like only a few of the junior explorers got a pass mark, if you read the above article. I am thinking of getting into Aura Energy (AEE) it seems to have a big uranium player in Mega Uranium from Canada in its corner with some very promising exploration ground.

Judging by the way some of the uranium stocks have been running on no news, it seems that it is only a matter of time before people jump on the AEE bandwagon who have just completed a 300+ hole exploration with results expected in early 2007

Could this be the next uranium stock to have a big run up?
What do you guys think?
Or is there any others you think might be better value at this stage?
 
YOUNG_TRADER said:
A possible explanation for the U crazy runs of certain stocks like NTU UNX

Overheated uranium plays spark warnings
27th December 2006, 9:45 WST

Analysts have warned investors about the risks of getting caught up in the hype surrounding uranium amid expectations that the radioactive metal will continue a blistering market run next year.

Brokers and analysts fear that investors face big losses by blindly jumping on to junior uranium plays that are going to the market with untested uranium sampling results and enjoying over-inflated market valuations.

A steady diet of trace uranium discoveries, record yellowcake prices and anticipated supply constraints has bulked up the market valuations of most uranium juniors to a hefty premium to their underlying net assets, with many uranium juniors packing on an average of 143 per cent in the past 12 months.

Far East Capital analyst Warwick Grigor believes investors are overreacting to uranium sampling results that do not warrant the enthusiasm and in some cases are misleading.

In his December uranium sector analysis report, Mr Grigor warned: "In most cases it is the trace of uranium that is exciting punters, and companies are reporting these traces as if they amount to a discovery.

"This is very misleading. Most of these companies will find that uranium has simply passed on by and the excitement has been premature."

Mr Grigor said it was not good enough for companies to just have a radiometric anomaly covering a paleochannel, companies needed to find out where the transport had stopped and if a deposition has taken place.

Few grassroot explorers with tenements in WA managed to rate above average in Mr Grigor’s sector poll, with Aura Energy, Aurora Minerals, Encounter Resources, Korab Resources, Scimitar Resources and U3O8 just scraping in with a fair rating.

Northern Uranium and Thundelarra Exploration were among the handful of junior explorers described as possessing good quality assets.

Daiwa Securities analyst Mark Pervan said 95 per cent of listed uranium juniors would never see the light of day from a production point of view because they were too small, did not have mining permits and the regulatory environment was too restrictive.

Analysts have warned that many investors were overly excited about uranium and not recognising there were long lead times involved in getting uranium production up and running, resulting in the stocks being priced as if mining and production were already occurring.

Over the past six months the uranium price has climbed 64 per cent, driven primarily by the anticipated energy appetite from the proposed construction of 178 new nuclear reactors, which represents a 40 per cent increase on current global nuclear infrastructure.

Last week the spot uranium price soared $US6.50 a pound to a new high of $US72/lb, marking the single biggest increase since price publishing began in 1968.

Resource Capital Research analyst John Wilson said that companies with advanced projects, such as Uranex, PepinNini Minerals, Berkeley Resources, Wildhorse Energy and Energy Metals were most likely to make rapid gains next year.

Mr Wilson forecasts the uranium price to be $US90/lb by mid 2007 and $US115/lb by September 2008.

Hartleys resources analyst Andrew Muir said most uranium juniors were years away from gaining any upside from higher uranium prices.

TRACEY COOK

Nice article, i wonder which year the forecast of uranium will fall? 2009? 2010?

thx

MS
 
Nuclear report due

The final report from the government's nuclear taskforce says Australia should move quickly to export more uranium.

The Prime Minister is expected to make the document public today.

The report is understood to estimate Australia could double its earnings from exporting uranium oxide by the end of the decade.

It also reportedly suggests a nuclear power industry could generate significant environmental benefits.

The Prime Minister is likely use the report in his attempts to persuade state Labor governments to remove restrictions on approving new uranium mines.






DYL, BMN, PDN, UXA - 2007
 
MalteseBull said:
DYL, BMN, PDN, UXA - 2007


One more SMM...The U stocks went crazy on the toronto stock exchange on thursday hopefully they will follow suit today on the asx. Thats great news!
 
Check this out, there is no owner yet for Angela deposit in NT. News said there are 40 applicants for it. Anyone knows who on the list? It looks like a lotto ticket, whoever get it will hit the jackpot. I wish one of the juniors will have it.

I quote from UIC:

Angela, NT

The Angela deposit, 25 km south of Alice Springs was discovered in 1973 and extensively drilled by Uranerz Australia in 1989, under a Uranerz-MIM joint venture. It has 11,500 tonnes of U3O8 at 0.13%, spread over several kilometres in sandstone.

After Uranerz departed from Australia in 1991, Angela was held under a retention licence, but this was relinquished due to prevailing Labor Government policy. Uranium Australia NL, renamed Black Range Minerals NL, applied for reinstatement of the licence, but it appears to have lapsed. Black Range has gone into administration.
 
uranium farms take forever to build - i agree with some of the other posts in this thread that it will take a bit of time before it explodes
 
If you find out , PLEASE let me know.....lol

mmmmining said:
Check this out, there is no owner yet for Angela deposit in NT. News said there are 40 applicants for it. Anyone knows who on the list? It looks like a lotto ticket, whoever get it will hit the jackpot. I wish one of the juniors will have it.

Nuclear conglomerate wants Aussie arm

Mandi Zonneveldt

December 30, 2006 12:00am

CHINA'S giant state-owned nuclear conglomerate appears to be planning an assault on Australia's growing uranium industry.

BusinessDaily has learned the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) has applied for registration as a foreign company in Australia -- possibly in preparation to explore and develop a deposit in the Northern Territory.
CNNC has inspected documents relating to the release of land in the NT which is known to house two potentially lucrative uranium deposits. The company is believed to have teamed up with Chinese investment giant CITIC in the bidding process.

The Angela and Pamela deposits were discovered in the 1970s and could contain more than 10,000 tonnes of uranium.

The NT government is believed to have received more than 30 applications to explore the area just outside Alice Springs. A decision on the leases will be made next year.

Xu Gang, chief representative for Australian consultants Sustainability Pty Ltd in China and consultant to CNNC, yesterday confirmed the company's interest in Australia.

Speaking from Beijing, he said a Chinese delegation had recently visited the Northern Territory.

He said the company would consider exploration opportunities as well as advanced development projects and had toured existing uranium operations in South Australia earlier in the year, including BHP Billiton's Olympic Dam and the Honeymoon uranium mine.

CNNC has responsibility for production, marketing, import and export of nuclear materials and uranium products in China. It controls assets worth more than $20 billion, including more than 100 nuclear reactors.

The company has also signed a letter of intent with Australian-listed Uranex to explore and develop uranium projects. Uranex has uranium prospects in Western Australia and the Northern Territory, but it is its exploration projects in Tanzania that are believed to have attracted the giant Chinese company.

China aims to quadruple its nuclear power capacity by 2020 and is looking for ways to secure its uranium supply. Existing mines supply about 55 per cent of current demand, with the shortfall made up by dwindling stockpiles of military uranium.

The gap between supply and demand has seen uranium prices skyrocket, from about $US35 a pound in January to more than $US70.

Chinese steelmaking giants have moved to shore up supplies of iron ore by taking stakes in junior companies with projects in Western Australia.

China appears to be jostling for position in the uranium industry ahead of a mooted change to Labor's policy on the development of new uranium mines next year.

The Chinese government-owned Sinosteel Corporation agreed in September to pay $40 million for a 60 per cent stake in two outback South Australian uranium projects, owned by PepinNini minerals.

CITIC has also built a position in uranium explorers Marathon Resources and Southern Gold.

The Federal Government signed an agreement with China in April which opened the door to uranium exports to the country.

Any Chinese investment in the Australian uranium industry will be subject to State and Territory legislation and foreign investment approval.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20987506-664,00.html
 
:eek:

Has any uranium player not gone up 50% + in the past 6 months. Could it be getting a bit frothy out there. Just how many of these explorers are going to eventually run a profitable mine. Concerning if you are a mid to long term investor IMO, but if you're trading and locking in profits, what an opportunity it has been. I'm starting to think that a good exit strategy/plan, and or willingness to take some profits off the table might be a good idea. This might go on for a bit longer, but just who knows. Good luck to all punters!
 
there is some explorers that are looking frothy. IMO however the uranium stocks that do already have deposits there are the ones who will continue to see gains. like SMM, MTN, AGS.

these stocks have significant sized resources and will clearly see benefit of policy change.

after reading that report shows australia is quite behind the 8 ball on the uranium issue. IMO we need to start developing nuclear power program now, we need to develop programs for education in universities nuclear scientists etc. we also need to start building the power plants. it will take a good 10 to 15 years to get a program up and going so changes need to happen today.

i agree with the fact that its pointless for us to continue investing in coal fired power when it will become expensive and obsolete anyway due to emission restrictions.

we have begun to see many larger institutions and energy providers investing in many australian uranium companies. is this due to change in the wind? could it be that the investors are sensing the coal industry will see a large shift??
 
its fair to say that if U sentiment turns sour, in the SHORT term, all U stocks will be hit, and hit hard... regardless of how 'good' they are.

when, and if at all this happens, is anyones guess...
i am loathe to have tight stops, cause of the volatility of the stocks i own, yet, having stops at 8-10% will end up costing me 10's of thousands of dollars!

Long term, you have to go with quality...
i.e. those with a significant proven resource, and shortest time to mine...

i am reasonbly happy that the 4 i own are high quality U stocks, BMN, PDN, MTN, and AGS... They all have significant resources, in mining friendly jurisdictions.
 
I wonder if this will cause a stir next week or if the blood bath in overall resources will drown out the Uphoria?


Mining industry welcomes China uranium deal
The mining industry has welcomed the ratification of the Australia-China Nuclear Transfer Agreement.

Australia and China have also ratified a Nuclear Cooperation Agreement, paving the way for Australia to export uranium to China.

Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer says the timing and amount of uranium to exported will be a matter for commercial negotiation.

Rob Rawson from the Minerals Council of Australia says he expects negotiations will begin quickly.

"We welcome the ratification, we think it's both timely and opportune," he said.

"It really paves the way for the export of Australian uranium and technology and services and so on without compromising Australia's strict uranium regulatory regime."
 
Rafa said:
its fair to say that if U sentiment turns sour, in the SHORT term, all U stocks will be hit, and hit hard... regardless of how 'good' they are.

when, and if at all this happens, is anyones guess...
i am loathe to have tight stops, cause of the volatility of the stocks i own, yet, having stops at 8-10% will end up costing me 10's of thousands of dollars!

Long term, you have to go with quality...
i.e. those with a significant proven resource, and shortest time to mine...

i am reasonbly happy that the 4 i own are high quality U stocks, BMN, PDN, MTN, and AGS... They all have significant resources, in mining friendly jurisdictions.

Quote me if i'm wrong but i don't think MTN is in a mining friendly jurisdiction at the moment until the 3 mine policy gets lifted.

Cheers!

Champ :)
 
YOUNG_TRADER said:
I wonder if this will cause a stir next week or if the blood bath in overall resources will drown out the Uphoria?


Mining industry welcomes China uranium deal
The mining industry has welcomed the ratification of the Australia-China Nuclear Transfer Agreement.

Australia and China have also ratified a Nuclear Cooperation Agreement, paving the way for Australia to export uranium to China.

Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer says the timing and amount of uranium to exported will be a matter for commercial negotiation.

Rob Rawson from the Minerals Council of Australia says he expects negotiations will begin quickly.

"We welcome the ratification, we think it's both timely and opportune," he said.

"It really paves the way for the export of Australian uranium and technology and services and so on without compromising Australia's strict uranium regulatory regime."

Nuclear deal opens $2bn door for BHP
Barry Fitzgerald, Resources Editor
January 6, 2007

Ratification of the nuclear safeguard agreements with China has cleared the way for BHP Billiton to begin pinning down contracts for the additional $2 billion a year in uranium it is planning to produce from its Olympic Dam mine in South Australia's outback.

Finding an approved home for the additional 10,500 tonnes a year of uranium is critical to the planned $10 billion expansion of Olympic Dam from 2013.

While the additional 300,000 tonnes of copper a year that would come with the expansion are easily sold into world markets, it is another matter with uranium.

But the task of finding a home for the radioactive material has been made easier by the emergence of China as a potential major customer, with first sales to the country now possible following the ratification of the Australia-China Nuclear Transfer Agreement and the Nuclear Co-operation Agreement.

The two treaties were signed in Canberra in April during a visit by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao. Canberra said yesterday that the timing and quantities of exports under the agreements remained a matter for commercial negotiation.

BHP has said previously that it is in negotiations with customers for uranium sales contracts to take effect after Olympic Dam is expanded. It is also playing hard ball, insisting in the negotiations that any contracts have a "floating price" as well as a "floor price".

That is an attempt to get away from the current situation where all Olympic Dam's uranium is contracted out to 2010 at prices that are a fraction of the current spot price of $US72 a pound. The contracts were written when uranium was in the dumps. Spot prices ”” as distinct from contract prices ”” doubled last year and are now 10 times the level of six years ago.

Australia's other big uranium producer, Energy Resources of Australia, has also been locked into low-priced long-term contracts. It received only $US15.57 a pound for its production in 2006. But a recent increase in the reserve base at its Ranger mine in the Northern Territory has it in the hunt for new contracts covering 11,100 tonnes of uranium for sale between 2014 and 2020.
 
champ2003 said:
Quote me if i'm wrong but i don't think MTN is in a mining friendly jurisdiction at the moment until the 3 mine policy gets lifted.

Cheers!

Champ :)

Sure, the 3 mine policy needs to be lifted first.... that is a national Labor party issue, issue effecting all states except NT.

After that however, i understand its still up to the individual state gov's to give the go ahead... and Queensland and WA have stated that they will be responding in the negative, regardless of the 3 mine policy being lifted or not.

SA Govt's position is... mine mine mine.... :D
 
Analysts remain bullish on outlook for uranium after nearly doubling in 2006

By CRAIG WONG

2007-01-07 12:58:00



VANCOUVER (CP) - After nearly doubling last year, the price of uranium appears poised to continue its bull run in 2007 as demand for the radioactive fuel continues to outstrip supply, analysts say.

"It is a commodity that has for years been under a lot of pressure from excess supply and now the seeds have been sown and we're beginning to see the flip side of that," said RBC Capital Markets analyst Adam Schatzker, who has forecast the price will average US$100 per pound in 2007.

"There is not a lot of mine production. The inventories that were being sold into the market are disappearing and we're actually in a supply-demand deficit."

Though hedge funds and other speculators are beginning to move into the uranium market, he said the biggest driver to the recent increase in price is a shortfall in supply and growing demand.

New nuclear power plants are being built in China and other parts of the world, while few new major deposits have been developed, leading to demand that is 40 per cent ahead of current supply.

For years the price of uranium removed the incentive to spend the money building any new production or searching for new deposits. With governments selling their inventories the markets were flooded with cheap uranium and there was no need to dig up new deposits.

But those inventories are depleting and uranium users still need the fuel for their reactors.

The price of uranium averaged US$28.15 per pound in 2005 and jumped to and average of $48.10 per pound in 2006. However the spot price for the radioactive metal was a whopping US$72 per pound at the end of the year.

Scotiabank commodity specialist Patricia Mohr has suggested that the current upswing in uranium prices is a "secular" change in global energy markets, due to the price of oil and that nuclear power generation emits virtually no greenhouse gases.

"While exploration activity has surged for uranium - across Canada, Australia, Africa and in Kazakhstan - there has been little improvement in mine production," Mohr wrote in a recent report forecasting an average price of US$80 in 2007, ending the year close to $90.

She suggested mine production gains this year will be limited as Cameco (TSX:CCO) and Areva will likely boost output in Kazakhstan, the Dominion project will start up in South Africa and Smith Ranch may be expanded in the United States.

The shortfall in supply was made worse when Saskatoon-based Cameco, the world's biggest uranium producer, reported flooding at its Cigar Lake mine in northern Saskatchewan, a project it had hoped to bring into production in 2008.

Construction at the deposit, which has proven and probable reserves of more than 232 million pounds of uranium at an average grade of 19 per cent, began in January 2005, but came to a halt last year after a flood that pushed back completion by at least a year.

Though the company has started round-the-clock work drilling holes to the source of the water inflow so it can pump in concrete, it is not known when the mine will actually be able to come into production.

Some market watchers have speculated that the Cigar Lake mine may never begin commercial production.

Schatzker said the flood at the mine that is expected to produce 18 million pounds a year when it comes does come into production, had a "fundamental impact on the market."

"The range of expectations of where that might go is all over the place because really a lack of information and a lack of clarity," he said.

But even with the trouble, Salman Partners analyst Raymond Goldie still rated Cameco a top pick for the year.

"We believe that investors have been overly concerned about the link between oil prices and uranium prices and about the flood at Cameco's Cigar Lake uranium project," said Goldie, who has a C$55.95 12-month price target on the stock.

"However, as investors realize that what Cameco loses at Cigar Lake on volume, it more than makes up on price, Cameco's share price continues to recover."

Investors have been flocking to uranium stocks, particularly those of junior companies with a lower stock price.

For example, Paladin Resources Ltd. (TSX:pDN), a small Australian miner that trades on the TSX and has uranium properties in South Africa, has been a top trading stock for several weeks on the Canadian markets.

SxR Uranium One Inc. (TSX:SXR), a Toronto-based resources company, has also been a popular investment as has been Denison Mines Corp. (TSX:DML), an intermediate uranium producer, with mining assets in the Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan, and the southwestern U.S. as well as exploration properties in the U.S., Canada and Mongolia.

Investors have been drawn to Denison because the company owns parts of two of the four uranium mills operating in North America today, giving the company a diversified mining asset base as well as milling infrastructure.

The Toronto company recently got C$100 million in financing to back its bid to acquire OmegaCorp Ltd., an Australian-traded miner with uranium projects in southern Africa, including the advanced stage Kariba Project in Zambia.
 
WA govt stands by uranium mining ban
Monday Jan 8 12:06 AEDT
The West Australia government has rejected a federal call to end its ban on uranium mining.

Federal Environment Minister Ian Campbell said WA should reassess its ban because nuclear power could be used in the fight against climate change.

Senator Campbell also said there were huge benefits to be made by the WA and Australian economies from mining uranium as the world was hungry for it.

But Acting Premier Eric Ripper rejected the call to dump the ban, one of Labor's central policies in the 2005 state election.




Mr Ripper dubbed Senator Campbell "a nuclear fanatic".

"I mean, the answer to greenhouse gas emissions is to look at clean coal technology, to promote renewables, solar, wind, wave, biomass, to invest in energy efficiency," Mr Ripper told ABC Radio.

"And, of course, Western Australia is contributing substantially to one of the other answers, which is to export LNG so that it replaces coal, for example, in Chinese power stations."

Mr Ripper said if WA lifted the ban it would come under intense pressure to accept an international waste dump.

"And that's something I know our electorate would be strongly opposed to," he said.

"We went to the people at the last election saying we're opposed to nuclear power, we're opposed to uranium mining and we're opposed to a waste dump in Western Australia, that's the contract we have with the people and we intend to honour that commitment."
 
yes, this is exactly what i was talking about champ2003.
3 mines policy has nothing to do with anything whatsoever, besides being an in-pricipal ability to mine if the state govt allow it.

As far as U mining goes, SA the one, other that NT which is federal territory.
 
Rafa said:
Sure, the 3 mine policy needs to be lifted first.... that is a national Labor party issue, issue effecting all states except NT.

After that however, i understand its still up to the individual state gov's to give the go ahead... and Queensland and WA have stated that they will be responding in the negative, regardless of the 3 mine policy being lifted or not.

SA Govt's position is... mine mine mine.... :D

This sounds most likely what will occur :)

So the next question is, which companies will benefit most from this?
Most likely the more advanced mines in SA?

Cheers :)
 
jet328 said:
This sounds most likely what will occur :)

So the next question is, which companies will benefit most from this?
Most likely the more advanced mines in SA?

Cheers :)
I'd really like to get a statement from the National Labor leadership on what will actually occur. There seems to be quite a bit of conjecture and misunderstanding. For example, many people are calling it a Three Mine Policy, whereas in fact, it was a No New Mines policy. Thus, the Honeymoon mine was approved last year because it had an application in or something prior to Labor instigating their 'No New Mines Policy yonks ago and we will therefore have 4 mines shortly.

My understanding is that the No New Mines policy is a core national labor policy and therefore, the States must abide by it, or they get their ar!ses kicked. Like kicked out!

Anyone have any quotes or better on what's going to happen?

Perhaps an email to Peter G on what will happen?
 
Top