This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Ukraine War

To bypass sanctions, Russia has passed a law that legalizes the Grey Market allowing Parallel Imports,
 
another site ... https://militaryland.net/ ... good maps

Pressure relieved on Kharkiv, Donetsk looking tough, as RU forces being redeployed from Mariupol, And the Kherson / Mykolaiv axis crucial
 
Last edited:
And the best commentator

Yes he is pretty good. Interesting but not surprising a gamer can use those talents honed in that sphere in other ways.

Following one of his vids "The Chieftain" presented an alternative view referencing one of Perun's vids and comments. All done without denigrating any particular view.
 
And the best commentator on the war, as a WAR, is Perun.
However, don't expect mere minutes, as Perun is an analyst with few peers, eg.

Glad you've both posted about this Aussie. His vids are very insightful and well presented.
 
Of course the real cost can't be tallied until it's over but the approx. cost of this little escapade so far:

Up to 2nd May 2022 - Ukraine: Infrastructure damage approx. $92 billion with approx total: $560~$600 billion

Up to 12 May 2022 - Russia: Hard to estimate but ranges anywhere from $1 billion to $20 billion per day!

Add other countries contributions.
Add the inflationary costs of commodities e.g. an extra $350 million added to the cost of buying oil since the start to the conflict.
Add lost GDP of those KIA.

Just a basic overview and doesn't account for the human suffering not only in Ukraine but other regions relying on vital commodities.

Data as per Joe Blogs.

 
I cannot located but there is a post here somewhere showing the costs to some companies which have withdrawn from Russia. Add Siemens (turbines, trains, medical technology) to the list.

 
from ISW. 13 May .. https://www.understandingwar.org/

Russian President Vladimir Putin likely intends to annex occupied southern and eastern Ukraine directly into the Russian Federation in the coming months. He will likely then state, directly or obliquely, that Russian doctrine permitting the use of nuclear weapons to defend Russian territory applies to those newly annexed territories. Such actions would threaten Ukraine and its partners with nuclear attack if Ukrainian counteroffensives to liberate Russian-occupied territory continue. Putin may believe that the threat or use of nuclear weapons would restore Russian deterrence after his disastrous invasion shattered Russia's conventional deterrent capabilities.
 
$40 billion passed by US Congress on top of the previous billions passed for the Ukraine war effort while US farmers are struggling to buy diesel or afford fertiliser (that couldn't end badly for anyone now could it). Baby formula at risk of being rationed in US (let that sink in). Whitehouse blames US citizens for hoarding.

Hmmmm, who could be benefitting from keeping the war going as long and bloody as possible???
 
and I found this interview with Henry K to articulate the realpolitik quite well

10 May, 2022

This is an edited transcript of a discussion between former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger and Financial Times US national editor Edward Luce on May 7 in Washington.

Financial Times: Earlier this year, we commemorated the 50th anniversary of the Nixon visit to China, the Shanghai communique. You, of course, were the organiser, the orchestrator of this Sino-US agreement. And it was a major shift in the Cold War: you split China from Russia. It feels like we’ve gone 180 degrees. And now Russia and China are back in a very tight relationship. My opening question to you is: are we in a new cold war with China?
Henry Kissinger: At the time we opened to China, Russia was the principal enemy, but our relations with China were about as bad as they could be. Our view in opening to China was that it was unwise, when you have two enemies, to treat them exactly alike.
What produced the opening were tensions that developed autonomously between Russia and China. [Former Soviet Union head of state Leonid] Brezhnev could not conceive that China and the United States could get together. But Mao, despite all his ideological hostility, was ready to begin conversations.
In principle, the [Sino-Russian] alliance is against vested interests, it’s now established. But it does not look to me as if it is an intrinsically permanent relationship

FT: The Biden administration is framing its grand geopolitical challenge as being democracy versus autocracy. I’m picking up an implicit hint that it’s the wrong framing?
HK: We have to be conscious of the differences of ideology and of interpretation that exists. We should use this consciousness to apply it in our own analysis of the importance of issues as they arise, rather than make it the principal issue of confrontation, unless we are prepared to make regime change the principal goal of our policy. I think, given the evolution of technology, and the enormous destructiveness of weapons that now exist, [seeking regime change] may be imposed on us by the hostility of others, but we should avoid generating it with our own attitudes.

FT: You have probably more experience than any person alive of how to manage a stand-off between two nuclear-armed superpowers. But today’s nuclear language, which is coming thick and fast from [Russian President Vladimir] Putin, from people around him, where do you put that in terms of the threat we are facing today?
HK: We are now [faced with] with technologies where the rapidity of exchange, the subtlety of the inventions, can produce levels of catastrophe that were not even imaginable. And the strange aspect of the present situation is that the weapons are multiplying on both sides and their sophistication is increasing every year.
But there’s almost no discussion internationally about what would happen if the weapons actually became used. My appeal in general, on whatever side you are, is to understand that we are now living in a totally new era, and we have gotten away with neglecting that aspect. But as technology spreads around the world, as it does inherently, diplomacy and war will need a different content, and that will be a challenge.

FT: You’ve met Putin 20 to 25 times. The Russian military nuclear doctrine is they will respond with nuclear weapons if they feel that the regime is under existential threat. Where do you think Putin’s red line is in this situation?
HK: I have met Putin as a student of international affairs about once a year for a period of maybe 15 years for purely academic strategic discussions. I thought his basic convictions were a kind of mystic faith in Russian history ...  and that he felt offended, in that sense, not by anything we did particularly at first, but by this huge gap that opened up with Europe and the East. He was offended and threatened because Russia was threatened by the absorption of this whole area into NATO. This does not excuse, and I would not have predicted, an attack of the magnitude of taking over a recognised country.
I think he miscalculated the situation he faced internationally and he obviously miscalculated Russia’s capabilities to sustain such a major enterprise – and when the time for settlement comes, all need to take that into consideration, that we are not going back to the previous relationship but to a position for Russia that will be different because of this – and not because we demand it, but because they produced it.

FT: Do you think Putin’s getting good information, and if he isn’t, what further miscalculations should we be preparing for?
HK: In all these crises, one has to try to understand what the inner red line is for the opposite number  ... The obvious question is how long will this escalation continue and how much scope is there for further escalation? Or has he reached the limit of his capability, and he has to decide at what point escalating the war will strain his society to a point that will limit its fitness to conduct international policy as a great power in the future.
I have no judgment when he comes to that point. When that point is reached will he escalate by moving into a category of weapons that in 70 years of their existence have never been used? If that line is crossed, that will be an extraordinarily significant event. Because we have not gone through globally what the next dividing lines would be. One thing we could not do in my opinion is just accept it.

FT: You’ve met [Chinese President] Xi Jinping many times and his predecessors – you know China well. What lessons is China drawing from this?
HK: I would suspect that any Chinese leader now would be reflecting on how to avoid getting into the situation in which Putin got himself into, and how to be in a position where in any crisis that might arise, they would not have a major part of the world turned against them.

— Financial Times

 
Latest from Kherson, Ukraine.


gg
 
This link was sent to me. My mind boggles. Some grim humour in the comments too such as "I give this turret toss an 8.2. Clean dismount, good rotation, 3 1/2 pike twist, and it really stuck the landing. You just have to admire that form, the rotation control, the perfect landing! Wow, just Wow."

 
Mariupol - still holding out


White phosphorus or thermite? (on an already burned and devastated environment)
 
am not sure you can blame Sri Lanka on the Russia-Ukraine thing

HOWEVER i am surprised neither India nor China stepped in to build stronger relations with Sri Lanka

India with the idea of forming it's own trading bloc ( as a sub-set of BRICs ) and China looking for a friendly port bordering on the middle-east region

but the economic contagion from the conflict are liable to be far-reaching
 
To bypass sanctions, Russia has passed a law that legalizes the Grey Market allowing Parallel Imports,

more importantly it would probably allow a flood of counterfeits , which i doubt the Russians would mind as long as they were paying 'cheap, knock-off' prices

i remember an associate who traveled to China when the first iPads were released , so being a computer professional bought a selection ( a REAL iPad , some close copies , and a clone .. externally different but internally superior to the genuine article .. all the optional upgrades included at less than half the real iPad's cost )

i am sure Apple would be delighted to lose the market share to Foxconn back-door escapees
 
From the ABC: Maca's to cease ops in Russia.

McDonald's has started the process of selling its Russian business, which includes 850 restaurants that employ 62,000 people, making it the latest major Western corporation to exit Russia since it invaded Ukraine in February.

From The Economic Times India: Companies sell their businesses in Russia and/or assets seized by the Russia.

Some Western companies have agreed to sell their Russian assets or hand them over to local managers as they scramble to comply with sanctions over the Ukraine conflict and deal with threats from the Kremlin that foreign-owned assets may be seized.
Also, don't forget the threats to the companies and the employees and their families if companies didn't comply with Moscow's directives!

From Forbes:
How will this impact?
A week or so behind but here's Deloitte's Weekly global economic update for the week of 9th May 2022, includes PMI.

 
As per the ABC, a defeat... of sorts.
 
As per the ABC, a defeat... of sorts.
I regard Mariupol as a defining moment in the impotence of the west.
Since WWII America has been involved in many skirmishes and wars, with occasional Australian support. But once we see a true ally in real trouble, and tens of thousands of civilians killed, we declare Ukraine a no-go zone because of Russian aggression.

If the day ever comes that China seeks to integrate Taiwan we will no doubt be as bold as we have been with Ukraine.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...