- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 13,405
- Reactions
- 19,834
Yes funny how the corrupt current Ukrainian government are turned angels?How about the Crimean oil reserves and their water supply that Ukraine cut.
Russians have already taken control of the canal.
I'm no war expert, I'd have to Google it if someone asked me the exact details of any conflict really, but I've long thought the same about natural resources.Not to target anyone, but i was always wondering: what the heck looking at US foreign policies and how dumb they were ,with no knowledge of actual history or people feelings, Kosovo, Iran, Irak, Afghanistan, Syria..and then the Russian border states..
How could they do so ...
no . no that changed a while back to politicians helping themselves first ,highlighted by that little adventure where super-fund managers ( including 'industry super-funds ' ) went overseas to find all the good places to invest Australian workers manyI'm no war expert, I'd have to Google it if someone asked me the exact details of any conflict really, but I've long thought the same about natural resources.
I mean I do "get it" that there are legitimate concerns about the natural environment and so on and for the record I do agree with a lot of that in principle, I can see the point people who oppose mines or dams or whatever are making and it's not without basis. But how on earth does anyone not see Western reliance on oil and gas as the single greatest problem far above and beyond all the others about which so much fuss is made?
Sending literally $ billions every single day, 365 days a year, to obtain a fairly limited resource from countries that are unstable, run by dictators or otherwise unfriendly to the West is just asking for trouble. Surely anyone can see that as being a massive problem which goes far beyond any problems caused by someone drilling a well in Australia?
One's something that we can regulate, that employs locals and which has a not zero but unlikely chance of going badly wrong and making a mess that's difficult to clean up. The other option funds war and destruction, potentially our own. Neither is good but the latter's far worse surely.
It used to bother me but these days I just see it as one of those things. Humans are highly intelligent individually but as a species we have some very major blind spots and do some really silly things.
I see that in the nearest supermarket I can buy chocolate made in Victoria, Tasmania or an unspecified somewhere in Australia. Or I could instead buy a well known product made in Russia. Why the hell is the latter for sale in the first place with or without a war? What happened to helping ourselves first? Better to keep someone employed in Melbourne or Hobart surely than to send money to the other side of the world to a country that we've never had great relations with.
Plenty more like that where the West seems to be doing really silly things that end up facilitating trouble.
Just a random observation. It might seem off that the world's largest nation by landmass, almost double that of the second, needs more land. There's likely an implicit understanding that without ongoing expansion Russia will always be under pressure to contract due to the myriad separatist movements.
Putin thought the West perceives Ukraine as acceptably part of his Frankenstein mess of states that don't really fit together. (He also thought the Ukrainians would be more accepting of that.) But the West's consensus seems to be that it's peripheral Europe. But periphery is NOT core, hence the headaches. Their steadfast resistance certainly makes the West want to help them. It was good to see the usually neutral Switzerland join in the sanctions against the dictator's regime.
Interesting stats on how much damage has been done to Russian forces, if you believe them. It looks like they might be in trouble. I initially thought their numbers for the invasion force were a bit light on. In general Army defence theory, you need 3:1 to mount an effective attack against a defending force, so the 120K or so Russians sounded a little light on.
I still don't understand why that huge column of Russian vehicles (assume it's the logistic tail) backed up NW of Kiev hasn't been taken out by Ukraine missiles or their airforce. A single run of a few jets could have decimated them. Three attack helicopters could have done it. Perhaps air defences around those trucks is pretty solid.
Article in the Oz:
Russia's forces decimated, defence chief says
Russia’s lead forces have been “decimated” and it is not inevitable that it will succeed in taking over Ukraine, The Times reports the head of Britain’s armed forces saying.
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, said Moscow had “got itself into a mess” and that its invasion was “not going well”.
He also warned that Russia might “turn up the violence” with “more indiscriminate killing” in response to the highly effective Ukrainian resistance.
As many as 11,000 Russian soldiers have been killed in the fierce fighting, according to the latest approximate figures published by the Ukrainian armed forces on Sunday.
An estimated 44 aircraft, 285 tanks, 985 armoured vehicles, 109 artillery systems and 60 fuel tanks have also been destroyed. Admiral Radakin said the Kremlin had lost more troops in a week than the UK did in 20 years in Afghanistan.
He also said that the morale of the invading soldiers had been knocked so badly that some had abandoned the convoy destined for Kyiv to camp in the forest.
– The Times
To be honest, this is propaganda going on both way.you never know the truth until much later.Interesting stats on how much damage has been done to Russian forces, if you believe them. It looks like they might be in trouble. I initially thought their numbers for the invasion force were a bit light on. In general Army defence theory, you need 3:1 to mount an effective attack against a defending force, so the 120K or so Russians sounded a little light on.
I still don't understand why that huge column of Russian vehicles (assume it's the logistic tail) backed up NW of Kiev hasn't been taken out by Ukraine missiles or their airforce. A single run of a few jets could have decimated them. Three attack helicopters could have done it. Perhaps air defences around those trucks is pretty solid.
Article in the Oz:
Russia's forces decimated, defence chief says
Russia’s lead forces have been “decimated” and it is not inevitable that it will succeed in taking over Ukraine, The Times reports the head of Britain’s armed forces saying.
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, said Moscow had “got itself into a mess” and that its invasion was “not going well”.
He also warned that Russia might “turn up the violence” with “more indiscriminate killing” in response to the highly effective Ukrainian resistance.
As many as 11,000 Russian soldiers have been killed in the fierce fighting, according to the latest approximate figures published by the Ukrainian armed forces on Sunday.
An estimated 44 aircraft, 285 tanks, 985 armoured vehicles, 109 artillery systems and 60 fuel tanks have also been destroyed. Admiral Radakin said the Kremlin had lost more troops in a week than the UK did in 20 years in Afghanistan.
He also said that the morale of the invading soldiers had been knocked so badly that some had abandoned the convoy destined for Kyiv to camp in the forest.
– The Times
Had thought there were reports the convoy were partly out of fuel and rations.With the long convoys
and soon they won't even be able to use the local drive-through for provisionsHad thought there were reports the convoy were partly out of fuel and rations.
Sidenote, those US dirtbags...(not the only ones doing it either)
A US pension fund was urging them to review their businesses in Russia because they face "significant and growing legal, compliance, operational, human rights and personnel, and reputational risks".McDonald's and Coca-Cola have been criticised on social media for failing to speak out about the attacks and continuing to operate in the country...
Not sure there will be a choice anymore...(chose from the above, 1 or 2, folks)
This particular part of the world, Ukraine, Russia with Istanbul has been in foment for 1500 years and it all goes back to the Fall of Rome and the movement East of the Christian Church.and soon they won't even be able to use the local drive-through for provisions
Pressure is growing on Western food and drink giants to pull out of Russia due to the invasion of Ukraine.
A US pension fund was urging them to review their businesses in Russia because they face "significant and growing legal, compliance, operational, human rights and personnel, and reputational risks".
McDonald's and Coca-Cola boycott calls grow over Russia
Food and drink giants have been criticised on social media for failing to speak out on Ukraine's invasion.www.bbc.com
If this keeps up, we'll have a bifurcated world.
- Liberal democracies on one side, desperately trying to reconfigure supply lines and adjust to the inflation/ stagflation (and not commit our young to senseless slaughter)
- the neo-USSR and China on the other; one supplying raw materials and food , with the other providing manufactured goods
- and then there'll be the teeming masses, food deficit and dollar a day places, that will hemorrhage their educated ones who will flee to somewhere that offers opportunity (chose from the above, 1 or 2, folks)
I agree, there’s mis and dis-information going on and always would be from all sides. But the article I pasted up was quoting the UK Chief of Defence Staff. I suppose Tony Blair said there were WMD in Iraq too…To be honest, this is propaganda going on both way.you never know the truth until much later.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?