- Joined
- 20 October 2006
- Posts
- 704
- Reactions
- 0
Or take out the cream and leave the initial investment, YUM and transfer to my account 1800 NEED CASH
I'm not a trader... I'm an investor who watches the market very closely and If I have to I will push the eject button... there hasn't been any reason to yet...
I'm fortunate to have invested in MTN because when I did I only knew a fraction of what I know of them... I had plans to knock them off after $3.00 but It's because of my research IMO it'd be better to hold... It's works and gives strong results... When the market changes then so will my strategy...
Insider - Temjin has just summarised just about all the requirements needed to trade successfully.
You would be wise to take note of these.
That's EXACTLY why you need a trading plan for your "strategy".
Hell, if you like, you can call it an "investing" plan, works both way to me.
You invested in MTN, but surely you have some sort of "criterias" for investing in such company. This is when to buy plan.
Now how long were you planning to hold, and what are your exit criterias? You planned to exit at $3.00 but it hasn't reached that point yet. What happens if it doesn't reach it? What happens if it dropped back below your original purchase value? You need to have a plan to prepare for all this and you just cannot ASSUME anything wouldn't happen just because your research skills into the fundamentals of the company tell you so. Anything could happen and there is NO EXCUSES not to plan ahead.
From what you have written so far, you only barely covered both concepts above and almost did it subconciously. (i.e. I will buy this share, hold it until $3.00 and get out if something happens.)
You completely ignored your position sizing, that is, how much of your capital are you willing to risk to get that $3.00 price share profit. Are you willing to risk 50% of your $5000? 20%? 10%?
What about the next "investment" you are going to make? Are you going to use the same strategy or going to change it? Are you sure the same strategy will work in the next 20 investments? Have you tested such strategies on paper before you commit your real money into it?
Do you think you can assume that your next 20 investments will be ALL profitable, that is, you exit at a profit? Are you prepared to accept a losing investment if your research fails? And if so, how much lost per investment? How many lost in a row can you accept before you lose your entire investment capital? Yes, you can change your strategy if a particular strategy does not work, but are you sure your next strategy is going to work, and wouldn't produce a lost too?
In my opinion, all investors should learn all the basic concept of successful trading, even if they admit they are just "long term investors". That's why I said there is no such thing as long term investor, unless you plan to invest like Warren Buffet where he almost never sell anything he brought.
Like I said, sell your holdings now and be very very happy with the profit you've just made. At least like A/tech said, you did a great job at letting profit run. Most "investors/traders" would have been satisfied and exit with a 100% profit on their holdings.
He's not a trader, Nizar. He's an investor , but i agree he should protect his investment with a stop at least....at the breakeven point as a minimum. I'd probably sell and get th 5k back. Anyway good on ya Insider.
Just curious, CGT is paid at marginal rate, Insider wouldn't have much CGT to pay would he?
Cheers,
Can,
Investor/trader it doesnt matter.
Its fine if you pick your entries from fundamental analysis, but that doesnt mean you should completely ignore position sizing and exits.
Those that look at fundamentals for entries but have stringent risk/money management and have exits PROVEN to have worked over time, do very well in the markets, actually not much better than random entry, but still, because of their money management and exits, they outperform big time.
Those that look at fundamentals for entries but have stringent risk/money management and have exits PROVEN to have worked over time, do very well in the markets, actually not much better than random entry, but still, because of their money management and exits, they outperform big time.
What's the evidence? Most studies I've seen suggest active management, ceteris paribus, decreases returns.
Maybe I should ask myself why I am bothering posting all these stuff anyway? It's not my money. heh Good luck anyway.
This has been a greatly entertaining and revealing thread. Don't buy a motorbike and move out of home - start a new thread titled "turning 50,000 dollars into 500,000 dollars"...
Temjin
Don't have reservations about trying to help someone else. That should be part of what a forum is about. You've offered Insider really good advice which hopefully he will consider.
Julia
You are mistakening "active management" from traditional managed funds verse money management theories in system trading.
Temjin
Don't have reservations about trying to help someone else. That should be part of what a forum is about. You've offered Insider really good advice which hopefully he will consider.
Insider
Remember how your spirits sank when MTN dropped significantly with many others amongst the recent correction. Perhaps it might be good to think about how you'd be feeling now if it had not recovered?
Sometimes we "fall in love" with stocks to the extent that we simply can't imagine them letting us down.
Good luck and good management
Julia
I agree with you Julia. I've also got a lot from your posts Temjin.
Thanks
Is he a system trader? I rest my case.
:bananasmi :bananasmi :bananasmi :bananasmi :bananasmi
Job done insider
Best of luck holding for CGT relief in Nov.
Congrats
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.