Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,965
- Reactions
- 7,071
Not amusing for holders. The article was about big investor comments.Possibly a cheap entry, or a huge dent to the brand. Amusing that it's got this far.
I remember one time when I had only owned the ev for a month or two, I had left the house at about 7am to drive around running some errands. I was heading home at about 10am and because I knew it was a sunny day I knew the car was going to recover all those kms I drove from my solar that day.This E.V driving certainly is cheap @JohnDe , I've done 2,300km I charge at home and align charging current with solar P.V generation so theoretically it isn't costing.
I have put in 1 paid for charge to make sure the chargefox app is working and that was $2.28 on the 7th Oct, so that is my running cost up until today. $2.28 I can't complain.
Not amusing for holders. The article was about big investor comments.
Summarising:
1. Telsa at the moment has no CEO as Elon isn't there. Investors want a CEO.
2. (Quote above re branding damage).
3. Opposition car companies getting their sht together.
Competition hotting up.
Not only traditional companies but also BV from China.
4. China story worrisome, spy acusations, actually making trade restrictions limiting sales etc. These guys can't be trusted. Link to this in article.
Still a sell to me.
What’s your estimated value of TSLA?It's a giant bubble deflating, plenty of people are going to be left holding bags, interesting to witness one of the great stock manias and the effect social media has on it all.
It's the AI potential..
Still a sell to me.
I don’t think revenue is a good way to value a company, profit is the more important indicator, but with a company growing as fast as Tesla is, it’s value is going to based on its future profit.At best it is the average of what other car companies are valued at over a cycle, which from memory is ~ 1x revenue, maybe a bit of a premium for old times sake.
However, reflexivity works in both directions, so I think the downside might get uglier than that.
Even though it took a few days for the update to arrive to our car, the timing worked well as we were just about to hit the road for a 4 hour journey in the Model Y—it was the perfect opportunity to put all the new features to the test!
Let me take a moment to explain why I think this guy is wrong, and why Tesla is definitely notInteresting analysis of Tesla's 70% share price collapse and review of FSD (misnomer and sacred cow). Is Tesla a car company or technology company? When "Tesla's auto segment accounted for 85% of its total revenue and an outsized 96% of its total gross profit in its most recently reported quarter" the conclusion must be it's a car company and car companies are generally not good businesses to invest in. Tesla shorts are cashing in on the high conviction that Tesla was in fact a tech company instead of a grossly overpriced EV car company.
Somebody much wiser than me once said "never fall in Love with a Stock".Let me take a moment to explain why I think this guy is wrong, and why Tesla is definitely not
Just a “car company”.
Firstly, what is a “Car Company”, I think a car company is a company like Ford who is primarily involved in the mass production of vehicles which it offloads at wholesale rates to third party dealers who earn a retail margin.
This selling cars at wholesale prices, in a super competitive market is what caused the “car companies” to earn low margins and hence have a low return on capital.
BUT,
This is not all Tesla do,
Yes Tesla makes cars just like Ford, But unlike Ford Tesla runs all the dealerships itself, so it also earns the retail margin on its products which Ford leaves for its third party dealers, so it’s a car dealership owner as well as a car company.
Tesla also earns money servicing and repairing its cars, which is a high profit margin business which again Ford leaves to its third party dealers.
Tesla runs a global network of charging stations which generate profits, where as Ford leaves this business to third party petrol station owners.
Tesla is building an insurance company to provide insurance to Tesla owners, Ford leaves this to third party insurance companies.
Tesla sells a monthly internet subscription service to its cars, I don’t think Ford is involved in the communications business.
Tesla sells the self driving software, which could end up being a huge business, Ford if it ever does this will definitely outsource it to third parties.
There is a pathway for Tesla to eventually have a robo taxi network, which would compete with the likes of Uber.
Then there is the no vehicle businesses.
Stationary storage eg home, industrial and grid size batteries.
Solar panels and virtual grid / energy trading.
And they have mentioned they will eventually get into other businesses such as HVAC, which is a huge market.
They are also starting to dabble in other consumer products such as their charging platform they just released, not to mention their exisiting business of producing home car chargers and branded merchandise.
Not at all, (I am in love with the products, but not my investment)Somebody much wiser than me once said "never fall in Love with a Stock".
I am afraid you are head over heels VC.
Mick
In addition to my other response to this statement I made above, I also wanted to point out that although “Never fall in love with a stock” is something that many traders repeat, none of these traders have an investment record as brilliant as Warren Buffet.Somebody much wiser than me once said "never fall in Love with a Stock".
I am afraid you are head over heels VC.
Mick
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?