professor_frink
Moderator
- Joined
- 16 February 2006
- Posts
- 3,252
- Reactions
- 5
professor_frink said:The SPI(Share Price Index) is the futures contract over the XJO, which is the S&P ASX 200 index. The XJO is slightly different to the XAO(the all ordinaries), the exact details of the differences-I'm not 100% sure of. There are more companies included in the XAO compared with the XJO, but dunno the exact differences.
At 2:55pm, the spi was at 5445.
You can get a delayed chart from futuresource if you want
The charts are normally very similar intraday, although I've found that when you look back at the charts of the 2 and look at the turning points in hindsight, the spi seems to be leading...just.Euler said:Can anyone comment on how closely the XJO and the SPI follow each other intraday? So far have been focused on the SPI, and haven't done a comparison. This may be a weekend project, but am interested in others' views. For example do you find the XJO leads the SPI or vice versa; does one try and come to meet the other; if so, when does it do this; if you have a system that trades the XJO can you use it {"blindly"} to trade the SPI {... that's not saying you take your eyes off the SPI action and not manage a position}.
STW is the ticker code for the exchange traded fund that follows the ASX 200(XJO). I think there is some element of speculation to it from what I've read-I think they will do some hedging with options and futures to try and improve the returns slightly, so it's probably not a true index tracking fund. You would be able to find info on it pretty easily from most online brokers.Thanks Prof,
Might need to check again but freddo didn't seem to use average yield in his calculations?????
Prof what is STW(asx200etf)?
The formula I quoted above for fair value was obtained from the ASX website....but that average yield thing has got me stumped!!!!
By the way did anyone get todays move?
I'm bummed out..... short trailing stop hit at 5465 ( market traded there for about 10 seconds) at about 1:15 then market falls another 40 odd points..gotta hate that!!!
Prof thanks for your feedback. It's something that I've wondered about without getting to involved in the analysis. But started looking at it this w/e and doing a prelim comparison. As I get my head around it I'll throw a question or three!!professor_frink said:The charts are normally very similar intraday, although I've found that when you look back at the charts of the 2 and look at the turning points in hindsight, the spi seems to be leading...just.
It's something I'm working on presently, so I don't have too much info on it at the moment.
Euler said:An observation on market depth just now .... 252 contracts ask @ 5461 ... have not seen that many at one level before ... ever! I had gone short @ 65 before i noticed that.
professor_frink said:That's an awful lot for this market!
I generally try to ignore what the depth is doing- so many orders get pulled before they get hit that it just distracts me from what could be going on.
Getting a lot of action around 52 the last 2 days- you still short Euler?
These MP levels seem to line up with pivots an awful lot of the time. Today's pivot was at 53. R1 at 71 today, so that one didn't quite line up.Euler said:I was watching it and it didn't get pulled as they approached it, and a few taken out. When SPI fell below 58 I couldn't see it or anything above it in the queue.
52 was my POC for today with a very tight bracket 45-61.
Covered short @ 56 ... am in very short term trading/scalping mode .... 2 trades today so far ... will check again after lunch break.
Don't have enough knowledge to help much but a thought to consider. Rather than doing an average mean of the sector yields should you not do a weighted average, which will take into account the weighting of each sector in the asx200? I may be wrong ... so discount it if you have considered it.neo said:The average yield of the above is 3.55%.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?